1 / 17

Reflections

Reflections. Implementing e-Portfolios in a KPC Cross-disciplinary Preparatory Cohort Program. KPC Pilot Project: Evaluating the Impact of E-Portfolios For a semester-long Student Success Cohort. ePortfolio Pilot Project Objectives

rendor
Download Presentation

Reflections

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reflections Implementing e-Portfolios in a KPC Cross-disciplinary Preparatory Cohort Program

  2. KPC Pilot Project:Evaluating the Impact of E-Portfolios For a semester-long Student Success Cohort • ePortfolio Pilot Project Objectives • To examine effectiveness of the ePortfolioas an assessment tool for a cross-curricular preparatory (student success-Smart Start) community • To assess potential links between the cross-curricular approach in the Smart Start Cohort ePortfolioto a possible AA degree e-portfolio

  3. KPC Pilot Project: Student Outcomes • Intended Smart Start Program Outcomes • Articulate educational and career goals • Take responsibility for their own learning • Apply effective reading and writing strategies for success in college • Modeled after Kodiak College Preparatory Studies • Assessment Measures • Indirect Methods--Measures of satisfaction and continuing interest (MAPWorks, Assessment Surveys) • Direct Methods--Quality of examples of assignments created, reflection

  4. E-Portfolio Development: Aspirational Goals • Hypotheses: • The ePortfoliowill allow students to integrate preparatory studies across courses and into the broader curriculum of the AA degree. (student outcome) • ePortfoliowill build confidence in the AA degree and in the students’ career choices and sense of empowerment in the educational process. (student outcome) • Reflecting on the ePortfolioand making connections between courses will promote student engagement, critical thinking, self assessment, and student retention. (student outcome) • The ePortfoliocan be used to assess student development from the beginning of coursework until AA Completion. (institutional outcome)

  5. Implementation • Four courses were involved in the pilot: • GUID A150 • PRPE A107 • PRPE A086/PRPE A108 • MATH A054/A055 • The ePortfolio effort was coordinated through regular meetings and ePortfolio scaffolding discussions • Created a shared ePortfolio structure, similar to institutions using degree ePortfolios (IUPUI, LaGuardia, SUNY) • Focused on life-wide, life-long learning with key areas in mind: About me, Life Goals, Service-learning, Academic Showcase, Portfolio Learning/Final Reflections • Focused on reflection as a tool for both formative and summative assessment

  6. Findings: The Importance of reflection • Grounded in theory (Cambridge, Cambridge, & Yancey, 2009; Chen & Light, 2010) • Coordinated reflection activities • Short time frame (15 weeks) • Categorizing Reflection/Rubrics • Engagement (results that go beyond what you are asking/creativity) • Connections (reflecting across disciplines creates a broad-view and could contribute to overall program retention) • Need for DEAL (Describe, Explain, Articulate Learning)

  7. Findings: Considering Faculty Involvement and Modeling • Faculty understanding of ePortfolios • Three faculty in specific disciplines; Math not involved • Some disciplines work naturally with ePortfolios • Integration or extra-curricular • Student-directed learning practices • Faculty practice with ePortfolios • Demonstrating personal ePortfolios to/with students • Shared understanding of platform • Technology problems • Access • Enhancing professional teaching and learning/best practices

  8. Findings: Usability of Digication • Ease of use • Multimedia, tab arrangement, lots of drop and drag, point and click, copy functions • Control of information • Student control and institutional control: not intuitive like other social media; gaining access for assessment; limited student collaboration capacities • Showcase abilities • Strength of this program; coherent, clear formatting • Cost • Relatively low; provides support from Digication; can be transferred to student • Longevity • Can be downloaded and saved if not purchased

  9. Snapshots

  10. About Me page in Digication

  11. Student Observations • Storage • “The cool thing is that it’s all organized in one spot.” • “It helps you put all your ideas together in a very convenient way.” • “It’s always going to be there.” • Showcase • “Creating a portfolio will allow me to be able to see my accomplishments.” • “You can really express who you are.” • “These things are very good for job interviews.” • Learning • It gives you the opportunity to assess your work.” • It is also a great way to keep track and show your academic progression.” • Portfolios allow us to expand our ideas and meet our goals .” • “As years pass by, you can also reflect on areas you have improved.”

  12. Findings: Clear benefits • Works well in a 15-week, coordinated Smart Start cohort • We have opted to keep e-portfolios as part of this program • Benefits for GUID A150 • Benefits for PRPE A107 • Changed textbook to fit with life-long learning model • Coordinated effort that fits into an e-portfolio framework • E-portfolios help shape the learning process for new students • E-portfolios shape the teaching process

  13. The Benefits • Alternate forms of expression, not simply text-based • Place to reflect on learning outside the class (discussed in literature, demonstrated in our pilot project) • Interdisciplinary approach in both teaching and learning

  14. Findings: The Challenges • Challenges for preparatory students • Class load • Technology for e-portfolios • Service-learning • Challenges in assessing preparatory students • Would need to teach more than text-based assessment • Who “teaches” e-portfolios? Works fairly well for Smart Start, but what about the AA?

  15. The challenges • Our original goal was to look at the possibility of e-portfolios for the AA degree at KPC • Needs institutional-wide buy-in • Culture of e-portfolio assessment • The broader it gets, the less specific perceived advantage from a student perspective • Needs to be a combination of top-down, bottom-up efforts • Well understood “purpose” • Complications of distance offerings from various campuses constituting a large portion of the AA • Learning curve for faculty, both full-time and adjuncts • Adjuncts teaching GERs, transitory nature of adjunct teaching and training

  16. The Challenges • Difficult to change mindset of faculty from an individual class setting and e-portfolio assignment to consider program-wide system that requires scaffolding • Especially for faculty already using portfolios in class-based contexts • Yet necessary components for each class that need to “fit” together • Individuals in disciplines mold and shape certain perspectives • In an AA degree you’d need an entity that helps shape learning in various areas • IUPUI—Student Services help orchestrate e-portfolio efforts • Institutional E-portfolios: How are they organized

  17. Recommendations • Institutionalization • Portfolio class in year 1 (first semester) and 2 (final semester), with trainings, optional seminar in between—then not all classes need to be teaching to the e-portfolio • Start with multimedia emphasis/training in mind • Connect with student experiences • Identify the audiences for both showcasing and evaluating ePortfolios • The more diverse the ePortfolio, the more learning may take place, but the less effective this may be for narrow assessment purposes

More Related