1 / 18

Meeting with Software Vendors 9 th August 2012

Meeting with Software Vendors 9 th August 2012. Presentation structure. Introduction Lessons learned Main goals of this coming registration What type of registration? List of Criteria Changes between the last registration and the coming one Provisional planning

renee
Download Presentation

Meeting with Software Vendors 9 th August 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Meeting with Software Vendors 9th August 2012

  2. Presentation structure • Introduction • Lessons learned • Main goals of this coming registration • What type of registration? • List of Criteria • Changes between the last registration and the coming one • Provisional planning • Mini Lab (Isabelle Pollet) • Answering specific questions • Documentation to be provided • AOB

  3. 1. Lessons learned • Overall the proposed methodology was well accepted • “Working Group Criteria” defines a draft list of criteria • Consultation of software providers + clarification on criteria • Final decision from the Working Group/MedicoMut on the list of criteria to be tested and the ones which will be “Auto-evaluated” + later • Invitation to Tender for definition of documentation (test scenario + tests)

  4. 1. Lessons learned • But .... : • Heavy and long (due mainly to the extra test for GPSMF) • Documentation (e.g. GPSMF) should have been ideally distributed earlier • Although criteria were successfully passed … does not mean they are “usable” for the users

  5. 2. Main goals of this coming registration • Entering the “eHealth World” (Communication with colleagues and other HCP) • User-friendliness • Meaningful usage

  6. 3. What type of registration? • As for 2010-2011, eHealth will launch an Invitation to tender to select a company who will have to provide the documentation for the testing and carry out the tests. • This time, it will concern three HCP: GPs, Nurses & Physiotherapists • 3 phases: • Phase 1 : A detailed documentation on the interpretation of the new criteria

  7. 3. What type of registration? • Phase 2: • documentation defining the population to be added in the soft for the tests • documentation defining the virtual patients to be added in the soft for the tests • Documentation defining the tests files (for instance: definition of the physiotherapist prescription to be uploaded); • definition of tests scenarios • Phase 3: testing

  8. 4. List of criteria • There are 3 types of criteria: • P= Previous ones • N= new ones • L= Later  they will be part of the next registration • From the new ones: • 17 are AE (Auto-evaluation) • 33 are C (Control) • 60 are Later • Numbering has changed to match with nurse and physiotherapist criteria

  9. 5. Main change between the last registration and the current one • There will be only one second round • No extra test (such as GPSMF) • Mini lab will be organised prior to tests: if the soft successfully pass the mini lab tests, the soft is exempt from testing during the tests

  10. 6. Provisional planning • End September 2012: Invitation to tender is launched • 1st January 2013: Selection of best bid • 1st February 2013: Documentation Phase 1 is provided • 1st March 2013: Documentation Phase 2 is provided • 1st May 2013: First Round tests • 1st July 2013: Evaluation & Results provided • 1st September 2013: Second Round tests (only one this time!)

  11. 7. Mini-Lab • Presentation: Isabelle Pollet

  12. 8. Answers to general questions • Question # 1: Le critère 122 de la précédente labellisation signalait que les dmi devaient implémenter les services d’ehealth : 1 an à partir de la mise à disposition : Quand peut-on considérer que les plugins (recipe, chap IV, hubs, ehealthbox, accès oa) ont été mis à disposition ? • Answering # 1: most of the web services are todayavailable. For the oneswhich are not yetavailable, software will have minimum 6 months to implementthem: • Recipe: cookbooks are available • Chapter IV: cookbooks are available • Hubs: cookbookswillbeavailable end of August 2012 • eHealthBox: cookbooks are available • Insurances (MyCarenet): cookbookswillbeavailable end of August 2012

  13. 8. Answers to general questions • Question # 2: Il nous paraitrait important vu le peu de documentation fournie pour les plugins de réaliser d’autres mini labs pour les services autres que les hubs. • Answer # 2 : We are studying the possiblity to organise mini lab for MyCarenet, Recipe and Chapter IV • Question # 3: Il est particulièrement important et nécessaire de garder une plage de questions/réponses sans discontinuité pendant toute la période de prélabellisation. • Answer # 3: A detailed documentation on the interpretation of the new criteriawillbeprovided (phase 1) at least 3 monthsbefore the tests. Questions willbeaccepted till 6 weeksbefore the tests.

  14. 8. Answers to general questions • Question # 4: Quel est le délai des tests : • délai minimal entre moment de finalisation des critères et début des tests, Answer : 9 months • Délai minimal entre disponibilité de l'infrastructure et début des tests: Answer : 6 months • Délai minimal entre disponibilité l’interprétation des critèreset début des tests: Answer : 3 months • Délai minimal entre disponibilité des scénarii de test et début des tests. Answer : 2 months

  15. 9. Documentation to providebeforetesting • Letter of intention to participate in the tests in 2013: due date September 2012 • Formulaire d’Inscription/ Inschrijvingsformulier (in February 2013) • Documentation contractuelle: contrat type gérant les droits d’utilisation du logiciel + maintenance + updates/ Contractuele documentatie:een exemplaar van het (de) typecontract(en) waarin de gebruiksrechten van het softwarepakket worden beheerd + onderhoud + updates (in February 2013)

  16. Ce formulaire doit être dûment complété, daté et signé par la personne compétente pour engager l’entreprise Unformulaire d’inscription par logiciel qui sera testé Joindre au formulaire la liste des critères « AE » avec la mention « OK » ou « NOK » datée et signée De persoon die bevoegd is om de firma te verbinden, dient dit formulier ingevuld, gedagtekend en ondertekend te bezorgen één inschrijvingsformulier invullen per softwarepakket Aanduiden vóór elk « AE »-criterium met de vermelding « OK » of « NOK » of uw softwarepakket al dan niet compatibel is met het criterium Formulaire d’Inscription/ Inschrijvingsformulier

  17. Coûts 3.000 € HTVA Décision motivée de réussite ou d’échec: la décision motivée de réussite ou d’échec aux tests sera communiquée aux candidats au plus tard 5 semaines après les tests. Échec aux tests: en cas d’échec aux tests, le candidat pourra participer à une seule séance de rattrapage. Kosten: € 3000 excl. Btw Gemotiveerde beslissing van slaging of mislukking: de gemotiveerde beslissing van slaging of mislukking voor de testen zal ten laatste 5 weken na de testen aan de kandidaten worden meegedeeld Mislukking voor de testen: indien de kandidaat niet slaagt voor de testen, heeft hij de mogelijkheid aan één “inhaalsessie” deel te nemen Déroulement des tests/Verloop van de testen

  18. Thank you for your @ttention!Questions?

More Related