1 / 17

PBO GPS Network

Learn about the importance of real-time geodetic data products for hazard monitoring and scientific research. Explore the availability, constraints, and future plans for real-time GPS data from PBO. Discover the definitions and quality assessment of real-time geodetic data, including latency and completeness metrics. Get insights into the NSF-funded real-time upgrade of 232 stations in the Cascadia region, with project milestones and budget details.

rickp
Download Presentation

PBO GPS Network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PBO GPS Network

  2. PBO GPS Network

  3. GPS Station Layout MET Station

  4. Cascadia Real Time • Why are real-time geodetic data products important? • For science-based hazard monitoring, real-time geodetic data are critical for determining static and dynamic displacements, slow slip and early post-seismic transients, and critical measurements between the seismic frequency band and static displacements. • Decisions and response can only be made as fast as the data are provide. • UNAVCO will provide realtime data delivery • Essential data products such as position estimates, tropospheric water content, ionospheric electron column density are not included in this proposal.

  5. UNAVCO Real-time Geodetic data • What real-time GPS data are available from PBO? • What are the critical constraints on delivering real-time GPS data? • Who are the primary customers of these data sets? • What are the future plans with respect to real-time data for the PBO?

  6. UNAVCO PBO RT Data • What are the availability of real-time geodetic products? • Currently UNAVCO in a beta-test phase streaming GPS data from ~84 PBO stations with an average receiver to PBO server latency of 1.11 s and an average of 93.2% data completeness. Data completeness is low because we are testing the “good, the bad, and the ugly” data communications scenarios. • For UNAVCO RT beta-test we are using a broad range data communications types including direct internet, VSAT, CDMA modem, and IP radio. • Note these are raw data only. Providing epoch-epoch solutions is a critical component of a science and hazards system.

  7. Real-time Geodetic Data Definitions • What are real-time geodetic data and how do you assess the quality? • The definition of real-time data depends on the on the science target, sampling, rate, and latency of data from instrument to user. • For earthquake and volcano science and hazards applications we use a a 1 Hz sampling interval and latency requirement of < 5 seconds for data between station to processing center. • Also need to define a “completeness” metric. For earthquake and volcano hazards applications we use a 95% data completeness requirement. • Other considerations include station up-time and the ability to respond to maintenance issues.

  8. Latency and Completeness Average latency 1.11 s Average completeness 93.2%

  9. Cascadia Real-time • NSF proposed real-time upgrade of 232 stations in Cascadia. • Funded as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act(ARRA) • Three year implementation plan • Initial upgrades focused on ETS critical stations • Priority based on science target, time line, location of personnel Before

  10. Cascadia Real-time • Station upgrades include power augmentation and upgraded data communications • 3-G CDMA modems • removing VSATS • high speed radio networks • Purchase data distribution and QC software including latency, completeness, position estimation After

  11. Year 1 Year 1 • Start work Fall 2009 • Upgrade Mount St. Helens stations • Upgrade 86 stations in fore-arc • Work driven by science targets and location of personnel

  12. Year 1 Year 2 Year 2 • Upgrade 37 fore-arc stations in Oregon • Upgrade high altitude sites including Mt. Shasta/Lassen

  13. Year 1 Year 3 Year 2 Year 3 • Upgrade remainder of back-arc stations

  14. Project Milestones

  15. Budget

  16. Personnel

  17. Data Distribution

More Related