E N D
1. INPO CM Evaluation Criteria Presented By:
Dave Farr
2. 2 Session Content Review “enablers”related to CM and evaluation approach
Discussed issues associated with design margins
Discussed aspects missing in INPO’s evaluation approach (by enabler)
Discussed session “Take-aways”
3. 3 How are Margins Evaluated Now? Evaluation of margin is situational
Margin is criteria based
Make change, then evaluate remaining margin
Structure of design change process
Formal review of calcs
Some don’t know the margins that exist
4. 4 CM 1 - Performance Consistent with Design Requirements Look at Operations/Maintenance procedures to identify the design requirements
For example, Alarm Setpoints
Equivalency Evaluations (safety vs. reliability)
Evaluate the bases for Op Evals. Were margins considered?
Older plants - How are requirements captured?
Look at how calcs are linked
Backlog of calcs awaiting update
5. 5 CM 2Roles and Responsibilities How is testing used to demostrate functionality after maintenance?
Target questionnaire to specific roles
Is CM training included in GET?
6. 6 CM 3Day-to-Day Activities Follow System Engineering on walkdowns
Look at blocking of under-voltage devices
Operator workarounds
Controls for equipment operated by vendors
7. 7 CM 4Design Change Process How does the vendor follow station programs?
Method/basis for accepting Field Changes Notices (FCN)
Temp to Permanent
Old design changes (excluding RIE)
8. 8 Take Aways Good to understand how the INPO questionnaire will be used.
Focus on CM needs to be communicated to plant management.
Need to establish the triggers for design margin reviews?
Scope of alignment checklists(Root Valves)
INPO wants to learn with us.