1 / 22

IR hall deflection study

IR hall deflection study. October 31, 2006 John Amann, Andrei Seryi. Motivation and content. To understand deformation of the floor in case of push-pull operation of detector

rollo
Download Presentation

IR hall deflection study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IR hall deflection study October 31, 2006 John Amann, Andrei Seryi Global Design Effort

  2. Motivation and content • To understand deformation of the floor in case of push-pull operation of detector • Displacement of the floor during push-pull operation is an important consideration that may affect design of the detector support and alignment system • A simplified estimation is discussed below • Thank Gordon Bowden for a lot of help and comments • Thanks to all colleagues who were involved in discussion

  3. Air-pads at CMS Single air-pad capacity ~385tons (for the first end-cap disk which weighs 1400 tons). Each of air-pads equipped with hydraulic jack for fine adjustment in height, also allowing exchange of air pad if needed. Lift is ~8mm for 385t units. Cracks in the floor should be avoided, to prevent damage of the floor by compressed air (up to 50bars) – use steel plates (4cm thick). Inclination of ~1% of LHC hall floor is not a problem. Last 10cm of motion in CMS is performed on grease pads to avoid any vertical movements. [Alain Herve, et al.] Photo from the talk by Y.Sugimoto, http://ilcphys.kek.jp/meeting/lcdds/archives/2006-10-03/

  4. Displacement of collider hall • Disclaimer • The estimations shown below are intended for very rough estimation of the variation of deformation under the detector, which affects design of its support and alignment system • Simplified elastic model is assumed, and essential effects such as long term settlement, inelastic motion, non-homogeneity of rock, IR hall shape, etc, were not taken into account • Early investigations (drilling, etc) of the site in the location of IR hall and careful engineering are crucial, independent of push-pull scheme

  5. Displacements of collider hall • Modeling it now with ANSYS, first results below • Also use approximate analytical model • displacement of elastic half-space under load of circular load** or radius R and mass M: • where E-Young’s modulus, n-Poisson ratio • and displacement outside falls as 1/r • express via Elliptical integrals • approximate analytically as show on next page *) 1) Gordon Bowden, private communication 2) [FORMULAS FOR STRESS AND STRAIN, 5th EDITION, Roark & Young, Table 33, p.519.]

  6. Deformation & its approximation Example of theoretical deformation for infinite half space under circular load and approximation used in the Matlab model Theory [1]: Theor_coeff=4*M/(pi^2*r0*E)*(1-nu^2) * 1000; % mm if x(i) <= r0 em=(x(i)/r0)^2; [Kell,Eell]=ellipke(em); Ztheory(i)= Theor_coeff* Eell; else em=(r0/x(i))^2; [Kell,Eell]=ellipke(em); Ztheory(i)= Theor_coeff* x(i)/r0*(Eell-(1-em)*Kell); end [1] Theory of elasticity, Timoshenko & Goodier, 1951 Approximation: Z0= (2*M/(pi * E * r0))*(1-nu^2) * 1000; % in mm ee=2; aa=ee*0.25; cc=ee*1; bb=(1+aa)*(pi/2)^2-1-cc; Zapprox= Z0 * (( 1+aa*(x/r0).^2 )./ (1 + bb*(x/r0).^2 + cc*(x/r0).^4)).^0.5;

  7. Assumptions for strength • Typical values of Young’s modulus • Granite, Dolomite: 50-70 GPa (Japan & FNAL ILC sites) • Sandstone: 20 GPa (CERN ILC site) • Concrete: 30 GPa • Soil (varies a lot): 0.1 GPa • Will assume 30GPa (3e9 kg/m2) which is conservative for deep site, and assume that sufficient amount of concrete is used for shallow sites to make its strength close to this value

  8. Note the comparison • IR hall 110*25*35m • volume ~100 000 m3 • amount of removed rock: 250 kton • two detectors: ~30 kton • the structural stability of the hall that need to be provided by careful design, does not depend much on the need to move the detector • If the IR hall built in water table, will have to solve engineering issues of buoyancy anyway. Detector moving along the longer dimension of the hall (and not along shorter dimension), which helps.

  9. Displacement, Matlab model Parameters: M=14000 ton R=0.75m (radius of air-pad) E=3e9 kg/m^2, n=0.15 (as for concrete) Number of air-pads=36

  10. Displacement, Matlab model Parameters: M=14000 ton R=0.375m (radius of air-pad) E=3e9 kg/m^2, n=0.15 (as for concrete) Number of air-pads=36

  11. Displacement . . ANSYS Results • Same Young’s Modulus and Poisson’s Ratio as MATLAB Model • Finite Slab - 25m x 25m x 3m • Air Caster Modeled as Circular Indentation • Slab Restrained in all DOF at Side and Bottom Areas • Material Model - Linear Elastic Isotropic • Mesh Element Type - SOLID92, 10 Node Tetrahedral • Plotted Nodal Solution for Y Displacement

  12. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results 25m x 25m x3m Slab .75m Air Casters x36, 14000 ton Load Evenly Distributed Y Max. Displacement = .003391” or .086131mm

  13. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results 25m x 25m x3m Slab .375m Air Casters x36, 14000 ton Load Evenly Distributed Y Max. Displacement = .006956” or .176682mm

  14. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results Analytical Model Predicts (Formulas for Stress and Strain, Roark, 4th Ed. p.323 eq.13) Y max = .007646” Y edge = .004868” Y max = .003823” Y edge = .002438” 5m x 5m x 1m Slab .75m R Air Caster 5m x 5m x 1m Slab .375m R Air Caster ANSYS Predicts Y max = .002789” Y edge = ~.00092” Y max = .005825” Y edge = ~.003233”

  15. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results Displacement vs. Slab Thickness 5m x 5m 1m Thick Slab .1m Thick Slab Y max displacement = .002879” Y max displacement = .249e-3”

  16. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results • Want to Investigate Y Displacement 1/r Decay • Model Changes to Cylinder on Block • Eliminates Indentation • Coarse Mesh – Fast, Now Can Model Contact • Cylinder/Slab Surface/Volume Interaction • No Friction • Vary Slab Thickness 1m, 5m, 10m

  17. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results 5m x 5m x 1m 5m x 5m x 5m A36 Steel Cylinder .75m R x .75m H

  18. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results Radial Growth of Y Displacement with Increasing Slab Thickness 5m x 5m x 1m Slab 5m x 5m x 5m Slab

  19. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results 5m x 5m x 10m Slab Y max displacement = .002737” ???

  20. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results 5m x 5m x 10m Slab Restrained Sides and Bottom All DOF Restrained Bottom Only All DOF Difference in Y Max = .001373”

  21. Displacement . . . ANSYS Results 25m x 25m x 3m Slab Restrained Sides and Bottom All DOF Restrained Bottom Only All DOF Difference in Y max = .0001”

  22. Summary • For typical ILC sites, expected detector displacements are about 0.5mm and local variation under supports around 0.1-0.2mm • Displacement estimated for elastic half-space may not be a good model for collider hall, so accuracy of estimations may be not more than a factor of two • Uniform distribution of support point is desirable (need to study its feasibility, assuming the need for maintenance of air-pads). More local distribution of air-pads closer to perimeter would increase variation of local deformations • Steel plates on the floor may help. They were not yet included in the estimations

More Related