1 / 35

13 th NOVEMBER 2013 ANKARA

13 th NOVEMBER 2013 ANKARA. (13 th NOVEMBER 2013). 10:30 OPENING Why we meet ? Who are the attendees ? Method 10:40 INFORMATION ABOUT EMERGENCY SITUATION 10:45 TANAP PROJECT STRATEGIC APPROACH 11:00 PRESENTATION 11:50 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 12:30 FINALIZATION AND COCTAIL.

ronald
Download Presentation

13 th NOVEMBER 2013 ANKARA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 13th NOVEMBER 2013 ANKARA

  2. (13th NOVEMBER 2013) 10:30 OPENING • Whywemeet? • Whoaretheattendees? • Method 10:40 INFORMATION ABOUT EMERGENCY SITUATION 10:45 TANAP PROJECT STRATEGIC APPROACH 11:00 PRESENTATION 11:50 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 12:30 FINALIZATION AND COCTAIL

  3. (13th NOVEMBER 2013) PROJECT TEAM

  4. 13th NOVEMBER 2013 ANKARA

  5. Agenda • Introduction • Purpose of the meeting • Presentation of theProject • Basic & Technical Information • Time Schedule • Location & Route Selection • Approachtothe E&S Assessment • ESIA Development • StakeholderEngagement • StakeholderEngagement • GrievanceMechanism • FutureStudies

  6. 1. Introduction PURPOSE OF THE MEETING • InformyouabouttheProject • Provideyouwithoverview ofthe Project status • Provide route selectionmethodology • Provideinformationaboutcurrrentstatus of National EIA andInternational ESIA processes • General informationaboutStakeholderEngagement Plan • Obtainyourcomments, questions and recommendations • Explain the next steps to come

  7. 2. Presentationofthe Project Basic Information * TANAP DoğalGazİletim A.Ş. is an establishment of SOCAR (80%) and BOTAŞ (20%).

  8. 2. Presentationofthe Project Framework Agreements • Inter-governmental Agreement (IGA) between Azerbaijan Republic and Republic of Turkey (signed on 26.06.2012) • Host Government Agreement (HGA),as an annex of IGA, between Republic of Turkey and Project Entity (signed on 26.06.2012) • Shareholders Agreement signed (SOCAR-BOTAS) • Gas Transportation Agreement with shippers (ongoing)

  9. 2. Presentationofthe Project Pipeline crosses over 20 provinces which are: Ardahan, Kars, Erzurum, Erzincan, Bayburt, Gümüşhane, Giresun, Sivas, Yozgat, Kırşehir, Kırıkkale, Ankara, Eskişehir, Bilecik, Kütahya, Bursa, Balıkesir, Çanakkale, Tekirdağ and Edirne

  10. 2. Presentationofthe Project Technical Information

  11. Robust Route Selection – Main Route Selection Principles Applied The process is constraint driven to “identify a technically feasible, safe and secure pipeline centerline and respective AGI sites with minimum impact on environment and land use”. Constraint based Principles: • Constructibility (topography, geomorphology) • Structural Integrity (geohazards – considered as key issue in TANAProute) • Public Safety and Security (distance to settlements) • Authority Provisions • Environment (avoid no-go areas, minimize crossing of protected areas) • CulturalHeritage (IntangibleCulturalHeritageAreas, ArchaeologicalSites) • Land Use (avoid areas of distinct utilization) • Infrastructure (minimize crossings of major infrastructure) • Relation with other existing and planned pipelines • Pipeline Security • Construction Cost (pipeline length) 2. Presentationofthe Project

  12. Robust Route Selection – Corridor Refinement Methodology 2. Presentationofthe Project Assessment of Project Area Mapping of MajorConstraints Data Processingby GIS Definition of Project Corridor Desktop WorksPubliclyAvailable Data CorridorSelection Assesment of Project Corridor Mapping of MajorConstraints Data ProcessingbyGIS Definition of 2-5 km CorridorAlternatives Desktop WorksPubliclyAvailable Data Assessment of CorridorAlternatives EvaluateCharacteristics of CorridorAlternativesby GIS Definition of 2 km PreferredRouteCorridor (PRC) Desktop WorksPubliclyAvailable Data

  13. 2. Presentation of the Project Robust Route Selection – Corridor Refinement Methodology Assessment of 2 km PreferredRouteCorridor Mapping of Constraints Data Processingby GIS Narowto 500 m SpecifiedRouteCorridor (SRC) Desktop andField WorksAuthorityLiaison Data CenterlineSelection Assessment of 500 m SpecifiedRouteCorridor (SRC) ConstraintsMapping Evaluation byGIS Definition of Centerlineand Construction Corridor Desktop andField WorksAuthorityLiaison Data

  14. Robust Route Selection – Selection of the Project Corridor 2. Presentationofthe Project Visualization of the overall constraint map developed in the GIS model green = low constraintred = high constraint

  15. Robust Route Selection – Selection of the Route Alternatives 2. Presentationofthe Project Visualization of the refined constraints developed in the GIS model to define route alternatives and indication of the major 3 alternatives investigated

  16. Robust Route Selection – Selection of the Route Alternatives Details of Constraints 2. Presentationofthe Project Area around Erzincan combines challenging geohazards (North Anatolian Fault & landslide) and areas with corridors occupied by existing pipelines.

  17. Robust Route Selection – Selection of the Project Corridor 2. Presentationofthe Project

  18. 2. Presentationofthe Project Robust Route Selection – Selection of the Project Corridor

  19. 2. Presentationofthe Project Baseline Studies – Objectives of Baseline Studies • Physical Component • TerrestrialandMarine Physical Studies • EcologicalComponent • TerrestrialandMarine EcologyStudies • SocialComponent • Socio-economicStudies • Terrestrialand Marine Archaeological/CulturalHeritageStudies

  20. Herpetofauna Ophisopselegans Testudohermanni Rana dalmatina Lacertamedia Dolichophisschmidti

  21. 2. Presentationofthe Project Baseline Studies – Objectives of Baseline Studies • To identify environmentally sensitive and no-go areas. • To identify environmental, social and physical constraints that have direct influence on route selection,design processes, ESIA process and constructionmethodology as well as ESIA process. • To gather baseline information required for National EIA process as well as Lender standards. Approaches; • Detailed literature studies • Intensive ecological and archaeological walk over surveys • Use of advanced technologies like photo traps, aerial photography and GIS • Habitat based ecological studies (in linewith Habitat Directives and EUNIS)

  22. 3. Approach to the E&S Assessment EIA (Local) and ESIA (Lenders) Process Targetis to prepare one single EIA/ESIA report for both Turkish Competent Authority (Ministry of Environment and Urbanization - MoEU) and IFIs(including IFC), as well as other potentiallenders. To achieve this goal, the following sections willbe included in Local EIA report in addition to local requirements: • Social Impact Assessment (SIA), • Livelihood Restoration and Resettlement Action Plan(LRRAP), • Stakeholder Engagement Plan (SEP), and disclosure • Non-Technical Summary (NTS).

  23. 3. Approach to the E&S Assessment EIA (Local) and ESIA (Lenders) Process ESIA Report to identify and assess the potential environmental and social impacts of the project as stipulated by the following requirements: • Corporate Policies of TANAP • Host Government Agreement (HGA) • Statutory and Regulatory Requirements of Turkey • Requirementsof International Finance Institution (IFI) “theLenders” (mainly based on IFC, EBRD and EIB requirements) • Equator Principles

  24. 3. Approach to the E&S Assessment Submission of ESIA Application File totheMinistry of Environment andUrbanization10 January 2013 Environmental Site SurveyStudy 42 PublicParticipationMeetings25 February-29 March2013 Submission of Final Local ESIA totheMinistry of Environment andUrbanizationand Lenders Scope Determination Meeting and Special Format forESIA14-29March 2013 On-going ESIA ESIA Decision of theMinistry of Environment andUrbanization

  25. 4. Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholder Engagement TANAP Stakeholder Engagement Plan aimsto: • Identify key stakeholders including vulnerablegroups; • Ensurethere are adequate mechanisms forreceiving theirfeedbacks and for sharing information; • Ensure issues raised by stakeholders are addressed in the ESIA as well as in project decision-making and design phase; and • Implement a grievance mechanism (forcomments, recommendationsandgrievance)for all stakeholders.

  26. 4. Stakeholder Engagement Grievance Mechanism • Atransparent and comprehensivegrievance mechanism has been establishedto supportan effective stakeholderengagement. • The Grievance Management Procedure has been prepared in accordance with the existing national and international policies, procedures, laws and legislations. • All complaints will be responded within a reasonable timeframe (10 workdays) . • Proposedresolution schedule will be 30 work days.

  27. 4. Stakeholder Engagement Grievance MechanismThe Forms

  28. 4. Stakeholder Engagement Grievance Mechanism – The Database A grievance management procedure is already in place; and a web-based «Consultation and Grievance Database» has been established for internal data management.

  29. Postal Adress : TANAP DOĞALGAZ İLETİM A.Ş. PK 106040 ULUS/ANKARA E-mail : info@tanap.com Web page : www.tanap.com Free Phone : 0 800 314 11 22 TANAP swichboard: 0 312 999 11 11 *Comments and feedback from national, local and village level communities will also be collected throughout the project by means of consultation meetings. 4. Stakeholder Engagement Contact Information is as follows*:

  30. 5. FutureStudies • Completion of ESIA Studies • Preparation of ESIA Report • Disclosure of the ESIA Report withthestakeholders • Preparation of Final ESIA Report • Completion of RAP andexecution of landacquisition • Preparation of EnvironmentalandCommunityInvestment Program • Avoid • Minimize • Mitigate • Compensate • Execution of constructionworks

  31. Thank You For Your Attention…

  32. (13th NOVEMBER 2013) QUESTION - ANSWERS

More Related