1 / 17

Artemis project proposal round 2013

Artemis project proposal round 2013. Johan Lukkien, Peter van Otterloo Monday, January 21, 2013. Agenda. Brief introduction into Artemis JU Procedure Results of Match Making event Questions – continuously. Public-Private Partnership: Joint Undertaking Artemis. General goal

ronna
Download Presentation

Artemis project proposal round 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Artemis project proposal round 2013 Johan Lukkien, Peter van Otterloo Monday, January 21, 2013

  2. Agenda Brief introduction into Artemis JU Procedure Results of Match Making event Questions – continuously

  3. Public-Private Partnership: Joint Undertaking Artemis • General goal • support R & D Activities … to attract the best European research ideas and capacities in the field of Embedded Computing systems. • Trends • increasingly large projects: >100py • implementation pilots (AIPP) + ASP • exploitation focus • Consortium • Industry dominant, Industry lead • per country: KI at most 50% • ‘Tree-based’ consortia • Proposal • Brokerage/matchmaking event • One phase: Full Project Proposal • business oriented, KI mainly for knowledge • Timeline • 3 years duration • Matchmaking: T0 • FPP: T0+8 • Start: T0+11 earliest • Funding scheme • 50% of integral cost, including travel and equipment • 66% national, 33% EU • not enough to pay new AIOs! • national funding is limited • Strategy • include staff in the budget to cover for holes in the funding

  4. 2012 Call 24 eligible proposals submitted 11 below threshold (= 40 / 60) 7M available in NL (+ 3.5 in EU) funding per country distributed over projects in which that country is partaking until money runs out NL in: CRYSTAL (4.3M), HoliDes (1.3M), ARROWHEAD (0.3M), ACCUS (1.07M instead of 1.9M) TU/e in: CRYSTAL, ACCUS, COPCAMS, ??? Negotiations ongoing, start April 1

  5. Example funding scheme • 3y postdoc: 380K @ 50% = 190K (ok) • 3y AIO: 336K @ 50% = 168K (not ok) • 0.7y staff (UD): 110K @ 50% = 55K (fills the gap) • total funding: 413K, 275K from AgentschapNL, 138K from EU • Note: • Effort, hence # TU/e partners / Artemis proposal is limited • Artemis is an industry motivated program

  6. Project types • Artemis Sub-Programmes: • ASP1: Methods and processes for safety-relevant embedded systems • ASP2: Embedded Systems for Healthcare and Wellbeing • ASP3: Embedded Systems in Smart environments • ASP4: Embedded Systems for manufacturing and process automation • ASP5: Computing platforms for embedded systems • ASP6: Embedded Systems for Security and Critical Infrastructures Protection • ASP8: Human-centred design of embedded systems • Artemis Innovative Pilot Projects, open in 2013 call • AIPP2: Innovative Integrated Care Cycles • AIPP3: Seamless communication and interoperability - Smart environments: the Neural System for society • AIPP5: Computing platforms for embedded systems

  7. Selection criteria • ASP: excellence of proposal • AIPP: efficiency in execution • less research, more development, large budget, high impact • success rate until now: 100% • Make a difference • ‘Think big’ (100’s of my) • eHealth and Cyber Security relatively low in the current clusters • hence, favoured (?)

  8. Brokerage Events • JU ENIAC and Catrene (EUREKA) • brokerage event Aeneas (Aeneas (the Association of R&D actors, i.e. the private part in the PPD ENIAC) Jan 23/24 • fully booked • Still to come: • ITEA brokerage event on March 19/20

  9. Public-Private Partnership: Joint Undertaking ENIAC • General goal • enhance the further integration and miniaturization of devices, and increase their functionalities while delivering new materials, equipment and processes, new architectures, innovative manufacturing processes, disruptive design methodologies, new packaging and ‘systemising’ methods. • Trends • exploitation focus • Consortium • Industry dominant, Industry lead • per country: KI at most 50% • Tree-based • Proposal • Brokerage/matchmaking event • Two phases: Project Outline, Full Project Proposal • Timeline • 3 years duration • Matchmaking: T0 • PO: FPP+4 • FPP: T0+8 • Start: T0+11 earliest • Funding scheme • 50% of integral cost, including travel and equipment • 66% national, 33% EU • not enough to pay new AIOs! • national funding is limited • Strategy • include staff in the budget to cover for holes in the funding

  10. EUREKA – ‘doing business through technology’ • EUREKA – from the site: • Raising the productivity and competitiveness of European business through technology. • Boosting national economies on the international market • and strengthening the basis for sustainable prosperity an employment. • EUREKA ‘Clusters’ – from the site: • long-term, strategically significant industrial initiatives. • usually have a large number of participants, • aim to develop generic technologies of key importance for European competitiveness • mainly in ICT, energy and more recently in the biotechnology sector. • Since 1985

  11. EUREKA Clusters • International consortium (at least 2 countries) • Rules, per country: • SME, IND, KI • certain division • IND/SME lead • International cluster label required for national funding

  12. EUREKA ITEA2 • General goal • advanced pre-competitive R&D in Software-intensive Systems and Services (SiSS) • Trends • relatively large projects: 40-300py • Consortium • Industry driven, Industry lead • per country: IND, SME, KI • Best: tree-mode construction, Core-team writing • Proposal • Brokerage/Matchmaking event • Three phases: Project Outline, Full Project Proposal, National proposal • Technically innovative • business oriented • Timeline • 3 years duration • Matchmaking: T0 • PO: T0+4 • FPP: T0+8 • NF: T0+12 – T0+16 • Start: T0+15 earliest • Funding scheme • 50% of integral cost, including travel and equipment • not enough to pay new AIOs! • national funding is limited • Strategy • include staff in the budget to cover for holes in the funding

  13. EUREKA CATRENE • General goal • Technological Leadership for a competitive European ICT industry • …nano-/microelectronics solutions that respond to the needs of society at large • Trends • relatively large projects: 40-300py • Consortium • Industry driven, Industry lead • per country: IND, SME, KI • Core-team for writing • Proposal • Brokerage/matchmaking event • Three phases: Project Outline, Full Project Proposal, National proposal • Technically innovative • business oriented • Timeline • 3 years duration • Matchmaking: T0 • PO: T0+3 • FPP: T0+8 • NF: T0+12 – T0+16 • Start: T0+15 earliest • Funding scheme • 50% of integral cost, including travel and equipment • not enough to pay new AIOs! • national funding is limited • Strategy • include staff in the budget to cover for holes in the funding

More Related