Table 10.1 Levels of analysis in the study of animal behavior

1. Chapter 10 Opener There are both immediate physiological and long-term evolutionary causes for why this male blue-cheeked bee-eater produces vocalizations when communicating with other bee-eaters

2. Figure 10.1 Evolution by natural selection shapes the mechanisms of behavior, as illustrated by the prairie vole’s mating behavior

3. Table 10.1 Levels of analysis in the study of animal behavior

4. Figure 10.2 Recruitment patterns in the honey bee

5. Figure 10.2 Recruitment patterns in the honey bee (Part 1)

6. Figure 10.2 Recruitment patterns in the honey bee (Part 2)

7. Figure 10.2 Recruitment patterns in the honey bee (Part 3)

8. Figure 10.3 Prairie voles are monogamous

9. Figure 10.4 The evolutionary relationships of the prairie vole and six of its relatives

10. Figure 10.5 The brain of the prairie vole, like that of all mammals, is a complex, evolved mechanism with special features whose operation helps explain vole behavior

11. Figure 10.5 The brain of the prairie vole, like that of all mammals, is a complex, evolved mechanism with special features whose operation helps explain vole behavior (Part 1)

12. Figure 10.5 The brain of the prairie vole, like that of all mammals, is a complex, evolved mechanism with special features whose operation helps explain vole behavior (Part 2)

13. Figure 10.6 A gene that affects male pairing behavior in the prairie vole

14. Figure 10.7 Song dialects in whitecrowned sparrows

15. Figure 10.8 Hearing and song learning

16. Figure 10.8 Hearing and song learning (Part 1)

17. Figure 10.8 Hearing and song learning (Part 2)

18. Figure 10.9 Song learning hypothesis based on laboratory experiments with white-crowned sparrows

19. Figure 10.10 Social experience influences song development

20. Figure 10.11 Social effects on song learning

21. Figure 10.12 Sonograms of contact calls of two parrots

22. Figure 10.12 Sonograms of contact calls of two parrots (Part 1)

23. Figure 10.12 Sonograms of contact calls of two parrots (Part 2)

24. Figure 10.12 Sonograms of contact calls of two parrots (Part 3)

25. Figure 10.13 The song preferences of female starlings

26. Figure 10.13 The song preferences of female starlings (Part 1)

27. Figure 10.13 The song preferences of female starlings (Part 2)

28. Figure 10.14 The song system of a typical songbird

29. Figure 10.15 Difference in the size of one nucleus of the song system

30. Figure 10.16 Song competition in the starling

31. Figure 10.16 Song competition in the starling (Part 1)

32. Figure 10.16 Song competition in the starling (Part 2)

33. Figure 10.17 Single cells and song learning in the swamp sparrow

34. Figure 10.17 Single cells and song learning in the swamp sparrow (Part 1)

35. Figure 10.17 Single cells and song learning in the swamp sparrow (Part 2)

36. Figure 10.18 Two phylogenies of song learning in birds

37. Figure 10.18 Two phylogenies of song learning in birds (Part 1)

38. Figure 10.18 Two phylogenies of song learning in birds (Part 2)

39. Figure 10.19 The song control systems of parrots, hummingbirds, and oscine songbirds

40. Figure 10.20 Songs match habitats

41. Figure 10.20 Songs match habitats (Part 1)

42. Figure 10.20 Songs match habitats (Part 2)

43. Figure 10.21 The dialects of whitecrowned sparrows in three parts of San Francisco

44. Figure 10.21 The dialects of whitecrowned sparrows in three parts of San Francisco (Part 1)

45. Figure 10.21 The dialects of whitecrowned sparrows in three parts of San Francisco (Part 2)

46. Figure 10.21 The dialects of whitecrowned sparrows in three parts of San Francisco (Part 3)

47. Figure 10.22 Two white-crowned sparrow songs from different dialect populations

48. Figure 10.23 Dialect selection by male white-crowned sparrows

49. Figure 10.24 Song type matching in the song sparrow

50. Figure 10.24 Song type matching in the song sparrow (Part 1)