100 likes | 335 Views
Objective. State the implications of presidential and parliamentary systems on democracy and the policy-making process. Prime Minister Gordon Brown. President Barack Obama. Presidential vs. Parliamentary Systems of Government. Presidential President elected by the citizens Parliamentary
E N D
Objective State the implications of presidential and parliamentary systems on democracy and the policy-making process. Prime Minister Gordon Brown President Barack Obama
Presidential vs. Parliamentary Systems of Government • Presidential • President elected by the citizens • Parliamentary • Prime Minister (PM) selected by the majority party in Parliament
Presidential vs. Parliamentary • Presidential: • Separation of Powers: Executive & Legislative • President and Cabinet are not members of the legislature. • Parliamentary: • No separation between legislative and executive branches • PM & Cabinet are MPs (members of Parliament) • PM + Cabinet members + other senior MPs in the party = the “Government”
Presidential vs. Parliamentary • Presidential: • Pres. & Cabinet can’t be removed due to losing a majority in Congress. (only by impeachment) • Nominees selected by primaries/caucuses • Elections regularly scheduled • Parliamentary: • Govt. remains in office only if it retains support of majority in Parliament. • Nominees selected by heads of party • PM may call new Parliament elections at any time up to 5 years.
Presidential vs. Parliamentary • Presidential: • President has only bargaining leverage over Congressional votes. • Members of Congress introduce bills. • Bills change significantly in Congress. • Both houses of Congress have significant power • Parliamentary: • PM has much leverage over MPs votes. • PM/Cabinet introduce most bills. • Bills are passed with few changes. • 2nd house of Parliament may have little power.
Presidential: Intricate system of Checks & Balances Judicial Review Presidential veto Congressional override of veto Impeachment Senate confirmation of treaties and Presidential appointees Etc….. Parliamentary System: Fewer Checks & Balances No Confidence vote House of Lords may delay legislation for 1 year Cabinet pressure on PM Question Hour Tradition & Reasonableness Checks & Balances http://www.c-span.org/Series/Prime-Minister-Questions.aspx
PAIR-SHARE DISCUSSION • Try to Predict Political Outcomes: • Brainstorm on how the two systems might impact the policy-making process: • E.g. efficiency, coherence of legislation, effectiveness of the policy-making process, stability, decision-making in times of crisis, ability to make broad changes in policy, democratic representation of a country’s citizens, etc. • Any other factors you can think of….? • Explain TWO Advantages and Disadvantages of each system.
Presidential System • Advantages: • Separation of Powers? • No branch or individual too powerful • More democratic? more interests represented; more compromise • Disadvantages: • Slow process • Piecemeal Legislation • Hard to create change / fulfill campaign promises
Parliamentary System • Advantages: • Efficient / Quick process • Easy to create change / fulfill campaign promises • More accountability to public? • Coherent laws and policy • Disadvantages: • too much Concentration of power? • Fewer interests represented • Change too drastic when parties switch? • Legislative process more symbolic
Brainstorm a Perfect System • How would you design your ultimate system? • Which aspects would you take from eiher system to create your ideal system? • Or do you prefer a strict parliamentary or straight presidential system?