140 likes | 294 Views
ADF&G’s Program for Marine Protected Areas in Alaska. Doug Woodby, MPA Task Force chair Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau, Alaska. MPA Task Force. Purpose: Make recommendations to the Board of Fisheries Approach: Science-based Focus on Reserves in relation to fisheries.
E N D
ADF&G’s Program for Marine Protected Areas in Alaska Doug Woodby, MPA Task Force chair Alaska Department of Fish and Game Juneau, Alaska
MPA Task Force Purpose: • Make recommendations to the Board of Fisheries Approach: • Science-based • Focus on Reserves in relation to fisheries
Task Force Composition • Commercial Fisheries Division • Earl Krygier, Denby Lloyd, Kristin Mabry, Tory O’Connell, Charlie Trowbridge, Doug Woodby (chair) • Habitat Division • Janet Hall-Schempf • Sport Fish Division • Scott Meyer • Wildlife Conservation • Bob Small • Commissioner’s Office • Rob Bosworth
Definitions • Marine Protected AreaAreas designated for special protection to enhance the management of marine resources (NRC 2001)with “year-round protection” (NOAA 2001) • Marine Reservezones within an MPA where removal or disturbance of resources is prohibited” = “no-take” areas (NRC 2001)
Impetus for MPA Public Process • Executive Order 13158 (2000) • Directive to develop national system of MPAs • Public proposals to Board of Fisheries • Proposals 42, 402, 424 for Marine Reserves • ADF&G staff interest in MPAs as management tools • Provisions of Magnuson-Stevens Act (1996) • Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) • Habitat Areas of Particular Concern (HAPC) • Industry concern for further loss of fishing areas
MPA Task Force Report • Recommendation for process • Literature review of the scientific basis • Catalogue and GIS maps of areas • Legal process for designating MPAs • Review of programs in other jurisdictions: Federal U.S., CA, OR, WA, BC
MPA Task Force Report • Recommendation for process • Goals and uses of MPAs in Alaska • Enhanced public participation (by March 2002 for April proposal deadline) • Site selection, size, and other design criteria • Monitoring and evaluation of effectiveness
MPA Task Force Report • Literature review of the scientific basis • Conserving biodiversity (inside reserves) • Improving fishery yields outside of reserves • Design criteria: size and location
MPA Task Force Report • Catalogue and GIS maps of Existing MPAs • Type of protections • History • Jurisdiction and legal basis • Boundaries
MPA Task Force Report • Legal process for designating MPAs • Board process • Council process • Joint Board and Council, IPHC • Legislative
Cape Edgecumbe (Sitka) Pinnacles • Closed to taking of all groundfish • Protects significant concentrations of lingcod 7.7 km2
MPA Task Force Report • Review of other programs: Federal U.S., CA, OR, WA, BC • Public and legal processes • Learn from mistakes and successes
Summary • Recommending a process to the Board • Science-based, focused on reserves • Significant public (stakeholder) process • Notrecommending specific closed areas • Opportunity to learn from mistakes and successes elsewhere