1 / 9

UK research data registry and discovery service: pilot phase 1 HEI liaison

UK research data registry and discovery service: pilot phase 1 HEI liaison. Laura Molloy HATII, University of Glasgow Digital Curation Centre. Work package 5: HEI liaison. Objective:

rpfeffer
Download Presentation

UK research data registry and discovery service: pilot phase 1 HEI liaison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UK research data registry and discovery service: pilot phase 1HEI liaison Laura Molloy HATII, University of Glasgow Digital Curation Centre

  2. Work package 5: HEI liaison Objective: liaise with participating UK HEIs to support the work of determining and testing how existing metadata records for data collections held at HEI-hosted data repositories can be harvested from their existing metadata catalogues - with the minimum of adjustment – into a central registry, to enhance findability and inter-repository searching.

  3. Work package 5: HEI liaison Recruitment • Recruitment of HEI participants: 9 active, several more ‘in the loop’ / potentially active • Requirements for active participation: • you need to have some research data, • to be able to expose metadata about it, and • to have that metadata provide a route to the data itself

  4. Work package 5: HEI liaison

  5. Work package 5: key facts surveys Aims • To understand HEI data repository landscape • To provide pre-intervention measures Findings • Datacentres: longer history; easier access to stats; higher FTEs than HEI repositories • Full findings: registry webpage

  6. Work package 5: gathering HEI responses and requirements Strategy • Project should incorporate representation of researchers’ needs • Service should look into what will encourage and increase reuse of datasets Technical • Software should be easier for users to understand • Software should be able to respond appropriately to deletions. • Desirable for software to be able to merge records (as opposed to new record replacing any older record with same identifier) • Service should promote visibility of research datasets to generic search engines

  7. Work package 5: gathering HEI responses and requirements Metadata • Desirable for the service to be able to harvest CERIF records from CRIS systems • Confirmation required re. whether metadata mappings will have version-specific convertors • Clarity required re. how many metadata standards the project can / should realistically support • Desirable to develop indicators of mandatory and optional metadata fields and their effect on discovery (e.g. as per LinkedIn) Workflow • Desirable for institutions to have opportunity to check quality of harvested output

  8. Work package 5: next steps • Continue to support and expand HEI participation for future activity • Evaluate a further technical solution; gather community feedback for preferred solution • Widen stakeholder group – variety of types of stakeholder

  9. More information at : http://www.dcc.ac.uk/projects/research-data-registry-pilot E: laura.molloy@glasgow.ac.uk

More Related