1 / 18

FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION. Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence and Aeronautical Systems Center. PURPOSE FOR MIP AND PDB TECHNOLOGY. Characterize lateral/vertical extent of cl-VOCs in soil and ground water

rtracie
Download Presentation

FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence and Aeronautical Systems Center

  2. PURPOSE FOR MIP AND PDB TECHNOLOGY • Characterize lateral/vertical extent of cl-VOCs in soil and ground water • Evaluate vertical distribution of cl-VOCs in ground water • Provide real-time data on lithology and contaminant distribution

  3. HISTORY AND STATUS OFCORRECTIVE ACTION AT GEAE • GEAE buys AFP 36 in 1989 • Corrective action begins in 1990 • Numerous investigations/interim measures performed • Approximately 150 monitoring wells on/off site • TCE and TCA in ground water remaining corrective measure • Investigate source of TCE/TCA at AF Plant 36

  4. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION • Determine Source of TCE/TCA in groundwater • 1. Sampling Design • 2. Sampling Locations • 3. Methodology • MIP Survey • 1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig. 2.2-3) • 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2) • 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3) • Direct Push Results • 1. Soil (Fig. 3.1-7) • 2. Groundwater (Fig. 3.1-9) • 3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig. 3.1-11) • Groundwater Monitoring Results • Passive Diffusion Bag Results (Fig. 3.1-13)

  5. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION • MIP Survey 1. Sampling Design • 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2) • 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

  6. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION • MIP Survey • 1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig. 2.2-3) • 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2) • 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

  7. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION • MIP Survey • 1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig. 2.2-3) • 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2) • 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

  8. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION • Direct Push Results • 1. Soil (Fig. 3.1-7) • 2. Groundwater (Fig. 3.1-9) • 3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig. 3.1-11)

  9. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION • Direct Push Results • 1. Soil (Fig. 3.1-7) • 2. Groundwater (Fig. 3.1-9) • 3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig. 3.1-11)

  10. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION • Groundwater Monitoring Results • Passive Diffusion Bag Results (Fig. 3.1-13)

More Related