1 / 15

Obstacles to Wind Generation Siting

This article discusses the obstacles associated with siting wind generation projects, including unreliable generation, noise and health effects, property value concerns, wildlife and habitat impacts, and aesthetics. It also provides information on grid interconnection requests by region.

russellkirk
Download Presentation

Obstacles to Wind Generation Siting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What obstacles exist to the siting of wind generation? Lisa Linowes, Industrial Wind Action GroupNARUC Wind Siting SessionNovember 14, 2007Anaheim, California

  2. Benefit – Cost Trade-off THE OBSTACLES • Unreliable generation • Noise and health effects • Property value questions • Wildlife and habitat impacts • Aesthetics www.windaction.org

  3. Grid interconnection requests by region (as of 10/07): • New England (NE ISO): 2,100 MW • New York (NY ISO): 6,800 MW • Mid-Atlantic region (PJM): 24,500 MW (northern IN and IL) • Mid-West region (MISO): 65,500 MW • Texas (ERCOT): 35,500 MW (most of TX) • South-central region (SPP): 19,300 MW (KS, OK, TX panhandle) • Western region (WECC): 11,200 MW (entire western US) • TOTAL: 164,900 MW • Notes: • a) rounded to nearest 100 MW; • some numbers may be inflated due to occasional multiple interconnection study applications; • entry in the queue does not guarantee a project will be built; however, it is an indicator of activity. www.windaction.org

  4. FROM WEST COAST: Intermittent resource. Can’t be counted on to meet peak load. Typically doesn’t blow on hottest days of the year. Less than 10% of nameplate at summer peak. Source: California ISO integration of renewable resources report (Draft) 9/07 www.windaction.org

  5. TO EAST COAST: Highly VariableWind speeds are highly variable hour to hour (see graph). Pay real-time RatesDeviation from day-ahead schedule; pay real-time rate for energy imbalance. Reserve ChargesAll energy produced above/ below day-ahead tolerance band assessed operating reserve charges. Source: Independent Economic Assessment of the Proposed Bluewater Offshore Wind Farm 11/07 www.windaction.org

  6. TO EUROPE: Two major studies, identical conclusions: wind energy provides 8% effective capacity. The relative contribution of wind power to Germany’s guaranteed capacity will fall continuously to 4% by 2020. Given forecast wind capacity of over 48,000MW , only 2,000MW of traditional power production replaced by wind . Source: E.ON Netz GmbH Wind Report 2005 www.windaction.org

  7. “The noise …is at times unbearable. At best we get a constant pulsating thump from the blades …During summer months it sometimes becomes impossible for us to sit out in our garden. When we go inside … the pulsating noise is so invasive.” Letter in the Carmarthen Journal May 2005 Noise? – Yes, unbearable and there’s no escape. “Noise and vibrations from the turbines penetrate our homes. At times there is no escape from it. It doesn’t matter which room you go to, there is no escape. [It] ranges from the sound of a high range jet to a fleet of planes …approaching but never arrive. When it’s really bad it takes on a repetitive, pulsating, thumping noise that can go on for hours or even days. “ W. Todd Testimony to ME Wind Power Task Force Sep 2007 Other issues: shadow strobe, flicker … www.windaction.org

  8. Noise: Lots of research; limited understanding www.windaction.org

  9. Property devaluation? Studies not conclusive; methodologies questioned. Somerset PA (above): “disturbed” Lempster NH (left) : “pristine” www.windaction.org

  10. Annual kill of bats by wind turbines in only the Mid-Atlantic Highlands region is projected to be 111,000 by 2020. (Kunz et.al) • Thousands of birds/bats killed yearly at individual wind sites in WV, TN, PA, NY and Alberta. Altamont is not an anomaly! (post-construction surveys) • Only modest investments in monitoring and data collection. In some cases, researchers locked out (NAS report, 5/07) Wildlife and habitat? Precautionary principle should prevail. www.windaction.org

  11. Economic opportunity? Costs of industrializing rural America Inflated economic gain, jobs Costs for backup power and transmission Active lobbying for reduced tax burden myth www.windaction.org

  12. Canadian project (left) Spearville KS (below) reality www.windaction.org

  13. Elk River KS – the flint hills 100 – 1.5 MW turbines Images courtesy Kevin Sink www.windaction.org

  14. What can you do? Recognize wind ‘farms’ and wind ‘parks’ for what they are – Electric generating facilities. Look before you embrace – Contradicting research should raise a red flag. Enable “public-friendly” proceedings – Participation should not be exempted – as recently happened in MD. Instigate state and local guidelines – Protect the public and the environment from negative impacts. www.windaction.org

  15. Thank You Lisa Linowes www.windaction.org 603-838-6588

More Related