170 likes | 2.26k Views
Direct and Indirect Experience. Effects on affective and cognitive responses in the attitude-behavior relation Millar & Millar. Attitudes. Tool Research Influences. Experience and Attitude-Behavior Relationship. Attitude influence is complex Personality Situation Direct experience
E N D
Direct and Indirect Experience Effects on affective and cognitive responses in the attitude-behavior relation Millar & Millar
Attitudes • Tool • Research • Influences
Experience and Attitude-Behavior Relationship • Attitude influence is complex • Personality • Situation • Direct experience • Indirect experience
Example: A new food • Reading about it • Attitude formed based on attributes or cognitions • COGNITIVE • Tasting it - the 2nd Street Bakery Bread • Attitude formed based on gut or emotional reaction • AFFECTIVE
Major question • If direct and indirect experience changes the degree that an attitude is affectively or cognitively based, then how does this change the attitude’s ability to predict behavior? • Many researchers have proposed that some behavior is more cognitively driven and others more affectively driven.
Terms to know • Instrumental behavior • preformed to accomplish a goal beyond the activity involved in performing it – more cognitively driven • Consummatory behavior • preformed only for the activity involved in performing it – more affectively driven (emotionally)
Millar & Millar - hypothesis • Attitudes formed through direct experience produce more affective reactions and are better predictors of consummatory behavior. • Alternatively, attitude formed through indirect experience produce more cognitive reaction and are better predictors of instrumental behavior.
Students + Puzzles – 3 studies • Study 1
Students + Puzzles – 3 studies • Study 2
Students + Puzzles – 3 studies • Study 3
Overall results • Results are part of a body of evidence related to the usefulness of the distinction between affective and cognitive based attitudes. • Application to Environmentally Responsible Behavior? • Advantages? Disadvantages?
Related article • Title: Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity • Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2008 • Test: research that shows greater experience with the natural environment leads to more pro-environmental attitudes. Affect can be both an important predictor of environmental attitudes and rate as more important by participants than cognitions. Greater experiences = greater affective connections.
Method and Results • Survey • Rural vs. urban childhoods • Richard Louv – Last Child in the Woods • What will be the ramifications if direct experience in nature is lost? Will it effect ERB?