300 likes | 425 Views
WORKING FOR FAMILIES. Kelvin Gallery University of Glasgow Wednesday, 11 th February 2004. Helen Chambers Head of Child Poverty Branch. Margaret Curran, MSP, Minister for Communities Guidance overview Sub-session 1 Coffee Sub-session 2 Lunch Clients perspective Getting Going Coffee
E N D
WORKING FOR FAMILIES Kelvin GalleryUniversity of Glasgow Wednesday, 11th February 2004
Helen ChambersHead of Child Poverty Branch • Margaret Curran, MSP, Minister for Communities • Guidance overview • Sub-session 1 • Coffee • Sub-session 2 • Lunch • Clients perspective • Getting Going • Coffee • Monitoring and evaluation, Keith Hayton, GEN • Enterprise and Sustainability, Vivian Balmain, Community Enterprise in Strathclyde
Margaret Curran MSP, Minister for Communities
Working for Families FundWhy • 320,000 children in households in poverty • 14% children in workless households • 187,000 children <16 of claimants of key benefits (20% of all children <16) But • Unemployment at 5.8%
Barriers • Flexible, affordable, appropriate childcare • Personal circumstances –skills, qualifications, confidence, mental health, culture, debt • Benefit/tax credit complexities • Failure at transition points
Sustainable Employment HE Full-time work FE Skills Training Volunteering Part-time work Worklessness
Activity Training Benefits Job Benefits Study Childcare
Activity Benefits Training Volunteering Study Job Support Childcare
Target groups • Lone parents • pre-New Deal, entering employment, sustaining employment, entering FE/HE • Parents on low income • Other stress in household • disability, mental health, dugs/alcohol problems
Service delivery • Parent Support • Service referral/brokering • Childcare – services/subsidy
Outcomes • Employability focused Not • Childcare outputs
Outcomes • Hard • employment/education/training/new deal • Soft • distance travelled
Core themes • conjunction, alliance, affiliation, connection, combination, tie-up, togetherness a.k.a • Partnership • Sustainability • Flexible, parent-focused services
Sub-session Choices • Urban issues to be overcome Gallery Restaurant (A) 2 minutes from Kelvin Gallery • Rural problems to be overcome Robing Room • Adult support to be delivered Gallery Restaurant (B) 2 minutes from Kelvin Gallery • Childcare challenges Carnegie Room • Client recruitment and referral Kelvin Gallery
Clients Perspective I didn’t think I was worthy of it at all It’s been really confidence building for me I could just put the wean in one room and go up the stair to my class I wish you could do the HNC at Rosemount! The future for me is looking a lot brighter than it did a couple of years ago I was actually quite a bad heroin addict and in a bad way... now I am waiting to go to teacher training college Because I am going out and getting an education it shows my son that’s the way to go …with a bit of encouragement I was told I had the ability to go on and do a HNC
Getting Going • Barriers • Solutions • The Way Forward
Monitoring and Evaluation Guidance Keith Hayton Associate Director GEN Consulting Claremont House 20 North Claremont Street Glasgow G3 7LE Tel: 0845-120-6244 Email: keith.hayton@genconsulting.co.uk
Objectives • Why? • How? • What? • When?
Why? • Demonstrate that the target group is being reached; and • Show that this group is moving closer to employability.
How(1)? • Have a project that will meet the Executive’s objectives; • Quantitative targets; • Have clear project outcomes:- • Numbers moving into/towards work or other positive outcomes; and • NOT the number of childcare places = output – a means to an end NOT the end.
How (2)? • Honesty about what can be achieved with the client group in a relatively short time:- • “Hard” outcomes may be limited; • Need to measure “soft” outcomes
What? • Implement a monitoring and evaluation framework:- • Profile information – show that the client group is being reached; • “Hard” outcomes – meet the Executive’s objectives; • “Soft” outcomes – distance travelled – e.g. changes in motivation and attitudes – need a baseline.
When? • Various times:- • Profile and “soft” baseline at/near the start of the project; • On completion of the intervention – “hard” outcomes plus “distance travelled”; and • At various stages after the completion of the intervention (3, 6 or 12 months?):- • Sustainability of intervention; • “Hard” outcomes; and • “Distance travelled”.
Conclusion • Monitoring and evaluation are not add ons; • Need to incorporated into project design; • If not:- • May not meet Executive’s objectives; • May not be able to show what has been achieved; and • Have to develop systems after the project has started.
Vivian Balmain Development OfficerCommunity Enterprise in StrathclydeEnterprise & Sustainability
The Ideal World • Places for All • Realistic Fees • CTC / WTC • Job Security
The Real World • Lack of Places • Fees • CTC /WTC • Contracts of Employment
Sustainability • Self Sustaining v Subsidised • Sustainability Audits • Sound Business Practice • Investment Readiness Tool • Loan Finance
What Works in Getting People Back to Work • Childcare Works • Full Employment Areas Initiative
Summary of the day All the documents (guidance, outline proforma etc) and press releases issued by The Scottish Executive can be found on: www.scotland.gov.uk/workingforfamilies