1 / 21

Driving Under the Influence in the City County of Honolulu A Profile of Arrestees, Case Outcomes, Collisions, Injuries,

Acknowledgments. The City

salena
Download Presentation

Driving Under the Influence in the City County of Honolulu A Profile of Arrestees, Case Outcomes, Collisions, Injuries,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Driving Under the Influence in the City & County of Honolulu A Profile of Arrestees, Case Outcomes, Collisions, Injuries, and Stakeholder Recommendations Michael Hallstone, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Department of Justice Administration University of Hawaii–West Oahu and Paul Perrone, Chief of Research and Statistics Crime Prevention & Justice Assistance Division Department of the Attorney General

    3. Study Goals To provide a more comprehensive statistical description of DUI in C&C Honolulu To document the concerns and policy recommendations of stakeholders associated with DUI issues in Hawaii Did not want to be the “know it all” researcher but rather present the data to more knowledgeable folks and ask them what they think it means and what policy recommendations or concerns they may haveDid not want to be the “know it all” researcher but rather present the data to more knowledgeable folks and ask them what they think it means and what policy recommendations or concerns they may have

    4. Data Sources 503 DUI arrest reports randomly selected from calendar year 2001 (approx. ¼ of all arrests) Used 2001 as wanted a majority of cases to go through courts Criminal history data for each DUI arrestee from Criminal Justice Information System (CJIS) Stakeholder meeting, comments, and recommendations No crime data are perfect but these are unique to Hawaii and are “case-level” and rare for DUI

    5. “Typical DUI Arrestee” Please see report for complete demographics A male in his twenties to early thirties A county resident Only somewhat more likely to have a lower or middle income-level occupation than a higher paid profession A Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) in the .129 to .141 range at the time of his arrest (the legal limit in Hawaii is .08) And is a first-time DUI arrestee without an extensive criminal history.

    6. Average BAC Average BAC= .135 Varies tremendously from .000 to .323 Especially top 25% - ranges from .174 to .323 BAC is affected by complexities of “real world” policing Must transport to a station with “legally admissible” testing device Making “PAS” device legally admissible evidence could possibly increase number of DUI convictions (see recommendations)

    7. Criminal Histories As a group DUI arrestees do not have extensive DUI or overall criminal histories Future research should compare DUI arrestees to both the general population and criminal subpopulation “Are DUI arrestees more criminally involved than the general population or criminals in general?”

    8. DUI Criminal History DUI History Over three-quarters of the sample had no prior DUI convictions Almost 90 percent had no more than one. Only 5 percent of the sample had three or more prior DUI convictions at the time of their arrest. Three prior convictions mark the threshold for being charged under Hawaii’s 2001“habitual drunk driver” law (HRS §291-4.4) as well as the current statute (HRS § 291E-61.5). Thus, small group of “persistent offenders”– (see recommendations) Most likely for most of this group their DUI offenses are a part of general criminal involvement and social disorganization --very highly correlated (.697, p<.001) NOT IN REPORT. Plain English: people who have many DUI convictions also have many other types of criminal convictions Errata sheet “DUI misdemeanors”

    9. General Criminal History Approximately two-thirds of the sample had no arrests or convictions of any type at the time of their arrest and, of those who did, three-quarters of the offenses fell in the misdemeanor and petty misdemeanor/violation categories. Small group with extensive criminal histories Again, future research should compare the criminal histories of DUI arrestees to those of both the general population and the criminal subpopulation.

    10. Relating Criminal History and BAC DUI arrestees with prior DUI arrests and/or convictions, and/or prior criminal convictions of any type (but not prior arrests) have significantly higher average BACs than do DUI arrestees without such priors Plain English: DUI arrestees with “priors” have more alcohol in their system However, the average difference is in the range of .02 BAC. As explained in the report, these results should be interpreted with caution.

    11. Case Outcomes High Conviction Rates ~83% of all arrestees ~90% of arrestees with BACs above legal limit of .08 Perhaps gives support to the idea going through the trouble of making the “PAS” device “legally admissible evidence” “public/private partnership” – would advocacy groups would be willing to help fund this? alcohol industry could be asked to contribute

    12. DUI-Related Motor Vehicle Collisions (“MVCs”) DUI-related fatalities not included (or known), but topic for further research About 30% of DUI arrests involved MVC Half single and multiple MVCs Slightly less than one-third of the people who were involved in DUI-related MVCs were injured. Of those who were injured, just over two-thirds sustained injuries that required emergency transportation to a hospital. Additional research should be conducted to determine if DUI-related MVCs are more dangerous than non-DUI-related collisions in terms of the likelihood and/or severity of injuries.

    13. Average BAC and MVCs Surprising result: Average BAC actually lower in MVCs which result in an injury than in accidents that did not result in an injury Small difference of about .01 to .02 BAC – about one drink?

    14. BAC Test “Refusers” and “Consenters” Criminal Histories 28 (5.6%) arrestees refused to take BAC test On average, BAC test “refusers” have greater number of prior DUI arrests (1.25 vs. 0.59) than “consenters” Also more misdemeanor, petty misdemeanor, and violation convictions of any type Plain English: BAC test refusers have had more DUI arrests and overall contact with the criminal justice system than do BAC test consenters This makes sense: more “savvy” defendant

    15. Conviction Rates of “Refusers” and “Consenters” Although not statistically significant: Conviction Rate for Refusers = 69% Conviction Rate for Consenters = 83% MEDIA PLEASE DO NOT REPORT!! Too few “refusers” in sample for statistical tests -- additional research need to determine whether difference is “real”

    16. Recommendations Overview Simplify BAC test consent form Approve PAS device BAC as admissible evidence Focus on deterring “average citizen” Conduct additional research

    17. Simplify BAC Test Consent Form Strong consensus amongst stakeholders that current form is too long and can be dramatically shortened Arrestees are intoxicated while a long form is being read to them Neighbor islands use much shorter forms successfully Proposed revision in Appendix

    18. Make PAS BAC Legally Admissible PAS results likely higher than “station” BAC To make PAS legally admissible Urge the State Department of Health to approve the PAS as a blood testing device in Hawaii. Set up a program to field test individual PAS devices on a monthly basis in order to assess and ensure accuracy. Opportunity for “public/private” partnership? Set up a training program to ensure that police officers use the PAS properly in the field. Opportunity for “public/private” partnership?

    19. Focus on Deterring “Average Citizen” Huge reductions in DUI over past 25 years probably due to deterring average citizen rather than hardcore alcohol/drug addict Average citizen is largest pool of potential DUI offenders Threat of punishment (deterrence) most effective for people with “a stake in conventional life” Government agencies and advocacy groups should work cooperatively to obtain both public and private funding, as appropriate, for these efforts.

    20. What Works According to Research DUI deterrence results from combined effects of a number of variables that result in: more DUI enforcement and news coverage These result in a greater perceived risk of arrest and thus a reduction in DUI Government and advocacy groups should work cooperatively to find “private/public partnerships” create funding to create more DUI enforcement and news coverage Taxpayers unlikely to support “government doing it all.”

    21. Download a Copy of the Report cpja.ag.state.hi.us Mahalo!

More Related