1 / 11

Thermal performance of high voltage power cables

Thermal performance of high voltage power cables. James Pilgrim 19 January 2011. HV Transmission Cable. Vast majority of transmission grid route length uses OHL National Grid has ~335 km of cable In some instances cable is the only option Urban areas Wide river crossings

samuelmaldonado
Download Presentation

Thermal performance of high voltage power cables

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Thermal performance of high voltage power cables James Pilgrim 19 January 2011

  2. HV Transmission Cable • Vast majority of transmission grid route length uses OHL • National Grid has ~335 km of cable • In some instances cable is the only option • Urban areas • Wide river crossings • Areas of natural beauty Buried HV Cables HV Cables in a Tunnel

  3. Importance of Ratings • Rating defines maximum allowable power transfer and is limited by dielectric maximum temperature (XLPE 90 °C) • Rating needs to be accurate • Pessimistic? Poor asset utilisation, higher costs • Optimistic? Risk of premature asset ageing/failure

  4. Buried Cables • Normally rated using analytical calculation of IEC 60287 • A reliable “pen and paper” method, but not hugely flexible • Proven to give optimistic ratings in some cases – for instance shallow buried cables which suffer from moisture migration in the soil • Solution? Use FEA to model coupled heat/moisture

  5. Buried Cables • Using dynamic backfill model implemented in FEA it is possible to explicitly model moisture migration • Requires characterisation of soil properties and thorough benchmarking in the lab • Can’t easily be modelled by pen and paper methods

  6. Buried Cable Results • Possible to model cable ratings under different soil/environmental conditions • Dry zone can be clearly seen forming around cable group • IEC 60287 uses somewhat arbitrary technique to identify this can give incorrect results

  7. Tunnel Ratings • Rated using numerical Electra 143 method which forces some assumptions • Constant tunnel cross section • Cables considered to be of the same construction, operating voltage and load • No consideration of cables in riser shafts • No consideration of cable joints/accessories • New, more complex tunnels often require these restrictions to be removed – hence use of FEA/CFD techniques

  8. Tunnel Rating Improvements • Better modelling of convective heat transfer through use of CFD • Verification with experimental data • Redesigning thermal networks on which models are based • Incorporating FEA analysis of cable joint temperatures • Provides a better end to end rating Tunnel Air Velocity Contours 400kV Joint in Tunnel

  9. Tunnel Example Results • Example tunnel with multiple independent cable circuits installed • Possible to trade-off load ratings between cables • Maximise utilisation of cable assets without risking excessive temperatures

  10. Conclusions • Using modern numerical analysis techniques cable ratings can be calculated much more accurately • This maximises asset utilisation while minimising risk of premature failure and loss of supply • An important component of the smart grid concept – provide better operational flexibility from our existing power infrastructure

More Related