90 likes | 172 Views
WG4: LCY-039. Items for Discussion for Joint Meeting between WG4 and WG2. 16/Nov/2009. Items for Discussion. Project Title of SQL/MM Part 8 Metadata Registry (MDR) Recognized conflict between WG 2 and WG 4 Metadata Query Language (MQL ) Rejected in the Jeju Plenary, June 2009
E N D
WG4: LCY-039 Items for Discussion for Joint Meeting between WG4 and WG2 16/Nov/2009
Items for Discussion • Project Title of SQL/MM Part 8 • Metadata Registry (MDR) • Recognized conflict between WG 2 and WG 4 • Metadata Query Language (MQL) • Rejected in the Jeju Plenary, June 2009 • Registry Query Component (RQC) • Registry Access Component(RAC) • MDR Access • Metadata Registry Access (MRA) • Reg. Access
Items for Discussion (cont.) 2. What should be the target registry (11179-3 Ed.2 and Ed.3)
Items for Discussion (cont.) 2. Target Registry (11179 Ed.2 and Ed.3) • Korea Suggestion : We need to maintain the current scope of SQL/MM-8 and keep developing its 1st edition. Then, after ISO/IEC 11179-3 3rd edition is standardized, we’d better revise the 1st edition of SQL/MM-8. The reasons we made such decision are follows: • ISO/IEC 11179-3 3rd edition is under development • SQL/MM-8 can be easily revised to cover the 3rd edition of ISO/IEC 11179-3 • The others such as the parts of ISO/IEC 20944 are based on ISO/IEC 11179-3 (ed. 2)
Items for Discussion (cont.) 3. Does WG2 have a list of incompatibilities between 11179-3 Ed.2 and Ed.3?
Items for Discussion (cont.) 4. Scope of SQL/MM Part 8 (Common part + Specialization?) • e.g., 11179-3(MDR), 19763 all Parts(MFI), 19773(MDR modules)
Items for Discussion (cont.) 5. Business Scenarios for Querying of Registries • WG 2 progress report? • Standardized data requirement for business scenarios?
Items for Discussion (cont.) 6. To what extent should Part 8 recognize the conformance levels defined by 11179-3?
Items for Discussion (cont.) 7. Should the Part 8 project be progressed by regular WG4/2 joint meeting or formation of collaborative group?