310 likes | 429 Views
Leadership Academy. May 30 / 31. Today’s Objective. The instructional leaders of SUSD will review, observe, and identify components of a standard SUSD model of the implementation of DII based on the Blueprint for Student Achievement. Agenda. Review the Blueprint for Student Achievement
E N D
Leadership Academy May 30 / 31
Today’s Objective • The instructional leaders of SUSD will review, observe, and identify components of a standard SUSD model of the implementation of DII based on the Blueprint for Student Achievement.
Agenda • Review the Blueprint for Student Achievement • Review the components of DII • “Game Film” Analysis • Practice application of Implementation Form and Rubric
High Performing Districts Believe… • All students can learn • Reversing the paradigm • Success breeds success • Successful students are rewarded through successful instruction • Student Achievement Data as a result of DII • We control the conditions of success • Redefining the District instructional standard
An SUSD teacher 2 0 17 11 1
Norms • Reward the “Risk-Takers” • Actively Participate – be open-minded, engage within group discussions (silently or verbally) • Practice Collegial Respect – different opinions from today are heard and respected • Demonstrate Professionalism – limited/no side conversations, actively listening, phones silent/off (no texting) • Assume positive intent by avoiding the deficit model • Parking Lot
Components of DII • As a table group, complete the handout • List the 4 components of DII. • Explain each component. • Identify what the 4 circles in the middle represent. • Discuss as a table group, how the circles and the components impact the Success Rate. • 5 minute activity
Standards & Measurable Objectives • 3 C’s – content, context, competence • Posted and referenced throughout the lesson • Students can restate and explain how they will demonstrate their learning • Student work is posted and reflects standards, difficulty, and complexity • Core curriculum is used appropriately
Lesson Structure and Sequence • Lesson is “chunked” • Lesson proceeds sequentially • Activate prior knowledge • Input/Model – I do • Structured Practice – We do • Guided Practice – You do with support • Independent Practice – You do • Closure • Students demonstrate their learning at the end of the lesson
Proactive Classroom Management • Minimal “stop-start”, smooth transitions • Frequent lesson orientation and alerts to next steps • Low profile controls • Praise-prompt-leave • Frequent physical proximity and eye contact maintained with all students.
Student Engagement, Correctives, and Feedback • Continuous multi-level feedback • Pre-correctives are utilized • A variety of interaction strategies are used • Leveled questions are employed • All students are continuously and intentially engaged
Direct Interactive Instruction Standards and Measurable Objectives Lesson Structure and Sequence AvailableTime Allocated Time Engagement Rate Success Rate Student Engagement, Correctives, and Feedback Proactive Classroom Management Adapted from ALS – DII Day 1 2011
Standards & Measurable Objectives • Review the rubric for Standards & Measurable Objectives • Use the DII Implementation Tool • Record evidence that shows what the teacher and students are doing.
Standards & Measurable Objectives • Gordon
Standards & Measurable Objectives • Discussion • Is this piece of the lesson considered a 3 or 4 on the rubric scale? • What evidence supports the score?
Lesson Structure & Sequence • Review the rubric for Lesson Structure and Sequence • Use the DII Implementation Tool • Record evidence that shows what the teacher and students are doing
Lesson Structure & Sequence • Discussion • Is this piece of the lesson considered a 3 or 4 on the rubric scale? • What evidence supports the score?
Student Engagement, Feedback, and Correctives • Review the rubric for Student Engagement, Feedback, and Correctives. • Use the DII Implementation Tool • Record evidence that shows what the teacher and students are doing
Student Engagement, Feedback, and Correctives • Discussion • Is this piece of the lesson considered a 3 or 4 on the rubric scale? • What evidence supports the score?
Proactive Classroom Management • Review the rubric for Proactive Classroom Management. • Use the DII Implementation Tool • Record evidence that shows what the teacher and students are doing
Proactive Classroom Management • Discussion • Is this piece of the lesson considered a 3 or 4 on the rubric scale? • What evidence supports the score?
Your Turn • Video of DII • Implementation tool to observe lesson through the lens of DII • One component for each table • Record evidence that supports why this lesson receives a rubric score of 3 or 4.
Reflect/Discuss • 5 minutes to discuss evidence with your table • Share out 1 or 2 pieces of evidence that represents a rubric score of 3 or 4 • Standards & Measureable Objectives • Lesson Structure & Sequence • Student Engagement, Correctives, and Feedback • Proactive Classroom Management
Today’s Objective Revisited • The instructional leaders of SUSD will review, observe,andidentifycomponents of a standard SUSD model of the implementation of DII based on the Blueprint for Student Achievement.
High Performing Districts Believe… • All students can learn • Success breeds success • We control the conditions of success
Closure & Next Steps.. • A year in review • August 1 & 2 - Principal & AP Advance • Topics: • Blueprint 2012-13 • DII & Implementation • Systematic Monitoring • Observation and Evaluation Motivational Video