1 / 82

Macronutrients in Pregnancy 2011

Macronutrients in Pregnancy 2011. Carbohydrate Protein Lipids. 2002 DRI for Carbohydrate. DRIs for carbohydrate based on brain glucose utilization RDA for adults and children = 130 g/day Median intake ~: Men: 200-330 g/day Women: 180-230 g/day. 2002 DRI for Carbohydrate in Pregnancy.

shana
Download Presentation

Macronutrients in Pregnancy 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Macronutrients in Pregnancy2011

  2. Carbohydrate • Protein • Lipids

  3. 2002 DRI for Carbohydrate • DRIs for carbohydrate based on brain glucose utilization • RDA for adults and children = 130 g/day • Median intake ~: • Men: 200-330 g/day • Women: 180-230 g/day

  4. 2002 DRI for Carbohydrate in Pregnancy • Fetal brain needs a minimum of 33 g/day • EAR for pregnancy (all ages) = 135 g/day • RDA for pregnancy (all ages) = 175 g/day • CV is 15% based on variations in brain glucose utilization • RDA = EAR plus twice CV CV: coefficient of variation (used when insufficient data to determine standard deviation) EAR: Estimated Average Requirement

  5. 2002 DRI for Fiber in Pregnancy • “There is no evidence to suggest the beneficial effects of fiber in reducing risk of CHD is different from non-pregnant adolescent girls and women.” • AI = 28 g/day (14 g/1,000 kcal x median kcal intake for group) • AI for non-pregnant women is 25 g/day

  6. Emerging Issue: Glycemic Index & Pregnancy

  7. Effect of a low-glycemic-index diet during pregnancy on obstetric outcomes(Moses et al. AJCN 2006) • 62 women randomized to counseling to promote low GI (LGI) or moderate/high GI (HGI) • Outcomes for HGI diet: • Higher birthweight (3408 vs 3644) • Higher prevalence LGA (3% vs 33%) • Conclusion: “Because birth weight and ponderal index may predict chronic disease in later life, a low-GI diet may favorably influence long-term outcomes.”

  8. Dietary fiber intake, dietary glycemic load, and the risk for gestational diabetes mellitusZhange et al. Diabetes Care, 2006 • Examined prepregnancy diet in the Nurses Health study (758 pregnancies in 13,110 women over 8 years), adjusted for age, parity, prepregnancy BMI, and other covariates • Results • Each 10-g/day increment in total fiber intake was associated with 26% (95% CI 9-49) reduction in risk of GDM • Each 5-g/day increment in cereal or fruit fiber was associated with a 23% (9-36) or 26% (5-42) reduction, respectively. • Dietary glycemic load was positively related to GDM risk. Multivariate relative risk for highest versus lowest quintiles was 1.61 (1.02-2.53) (P for trend 0.03).

  9. The dietary glycemic index during pregnancy: influence on infant birth weight, fetal growth, and biomarkers of carbohydrate metabolismScholl et al, Am J Epi, 2004) • n=1082, very low income, mostly young, ethnic minorities in Camden NJ • women with a dietary glycemic index in the lowest quintile had approximately a twofold increased risk of bearing a growth-restricted infant compared to middle quintile: AOR = 1.75 (1.10, 2.77)

  10. Dietary advice in pregnancy for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus (Cochrane, 2008) • Three trials, 107 women. • “While a low glycaemic index diet was seen to be beneficial for some outcomes for both mother and child, results from the review were inconclusive” • “No conclusions could be drawn from the high-fibre versus control-diet comparison since the trial involved did not report on many of the outcomes we prespecified”

  11. 2002 RDA

  12. EAR for Protein in Pregnancy • EAR = 21 g/day above protein needs at prepregnancy weight • EAR Per kg • Increased amount on a per kg basis is 0.22 g/protein/kg/day • EAR for non-pregnant = 0.66 g protein/kg per day • EAR for pregnancy = 0.88 g/kg/day

  13. RDA for Protein for Pregnancy • 1.1 g/kg/day or 25 g/day additional protein (EAR plus allowance for individual variation) • RDA for women aged 19-50 is 46 g/day • RDA is 71g protein per day Reference woman is 57 kg

  14. RDA to Diet • RDAs calculated using high quality reference proteins like egg, meat, milk or fish • However, even with adjustments for lower quality proteins most women in the US who are meeting energy needs with reasonable food choices, will meet protein needs. • Range in US is 75 to 110 g per day for women.

  15. Vegan Diet & Protein Intake

  16. Energy and Protein • If energy needs are not met by diet then protein will be used for energy • RDA calculations assume adequate energy intake

  17. Protein Supplementation • In developing countries protein and energy supplements may improve pregnancy outcomes when women are undernourished • There is little evidence that protein supplementation affects outcome in developed countries

  18. Adverse Effects of Protein Supplementation • Several human and animal studies of protein supplementation have found adverse effects including retarded fetal growth, increase in prematurity, and increased neonatal deaths.

  19. Energy and protein intake in pregnancy – Cochrane, 2010 • To assess the effects of advice to increase or reduce energy or protein intake, or of actual energy or protein supplementation or restriction, during pregnancy on energy and protein intakes, gestational weight gain, and the outcome of pregnancy.

  20. Dietary Advice: • 5 trials (1135 women) • Nutritional advice to increase energy and protein intake was successful in achieving those goals • No consistent benefit was observed on pregnancy outcomes.

  21. Balanced Energy/Protein Supplementation • 13 trials (4665 women) • Modest increases in maternal weight gain & mean birthweight • Substantial reduction in SGA • No effect on preterm birth • Reduced risk of stillbirth and neonatal death

  22. High-protein Supplementation • 2 trials (529 women) • Small, non-significant increase in maternal weight gain • Non-significant reduction in mean birthweight • Significantly increased risk of SGA birth • Non-significantly increased risk of neonatal death.

  23. Isocaloric Protein Supplementation • 3 trials, 966 women • Increased risk of SGA

  24. Energy/protein Restriction with Overweight or High Weight Gain • Significantly reduced weekly maternal weight gain & mean birthweight • No effect on pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia.

  25. Author’s Conclusions • High-protein/balanced-protein supplementation alone is not beneficial and may be harmful to the fetus. • Protein/energy restriction of pregnant women who are overweight, or exhibit high weight gain, is unlikely to be beneficial and may be harmful to the fetus.

  26. Lipids • General lipid recommendations for pregnancy • Essential fatty acids & LCPUFA • Trans FA

  27. Lipids: Maternal • Metabolism changes to: • meet increased maternal needs for energy and hormone precursors • to insure adequate fetal accretion • Serum cholesterol rises 25-40% • Triglycerides rise 200-400%

  28. Lipids: Maternal Recommendations, 2002 DRI • 30% of kcals from fat is a reasonable goal in pregnancy. • There is no need to try to affect the physiological rise in blood lipids

  29. Essential and LCPUFA

  30. Important Fatty Acids

  31. Background: LCPUFA • Dietary sources of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids are essential. • Fetal ability to elongate and desaturate fatty acids is limited. • Conversion of LNA to DHA is highly variable among individual infants.

  32. Innis. J Peds. 2003

  33. Fetal Implications • Human brain is lipid based; ~ 60% of dry weight • 30% of fetal CNS tissue is LCPUFA with n-3 to n-6 ratio of 2:1 • Fetal brain development starts early & experiences “growth spurt” during last trimester and 1st 6 months of life • In 3rd trimester, storage of LCPUFA in fetal adipose tissue if adequate maternal sources • Adequacy of LCPUFA associated with CNS and retinal function.

  34. Arterburn et al, Am J Clin Nutr, 2006

  35. Background: Placental Transfer • The fetus is totally dependent on maternal intake and placental transfer. • The placenta selectively transports LCPUFA • Concentrations of DHA and ARA are 300 to 400 fold higher in fetal vs maternal plasma phospholipids

  36. Innis. J Peds. 2003

  37. Maternal LCPUFA status maters to the Infant • Women with higher plasma ARA and DHA during pregnancy have infants with higher ARA and DHA • Higher n-6 and n-3 status at birth results in higher ARA and DHA for several weeks.

  38. Dunstan et al. Pediatr Res, 2007. Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy on breastmilk FA composition over the course of lactation • RCT, n=98, Fish oil (2.2.g DHA, 1.1 g EPA) vs olive oil from 20 wk to term • Breastmilk had higher DHA & EPA at 3 d and 6 weeks • Infants had higher DHA/EPA at 1 yr • Positive correlations between breastmilk DHA/EPA and infant developmental scores

  39. Maternal LCPUFA Status matters to the Pregnancy • Eicosanoids derived from LCPUFA (prostaglandins, thromboxanes, prostacylcins, leukotrienes) play vital roles in pregnancy • The ideal ratio of n-3 to n-6 remains unknown • Dietary sources of EFA - both n-3 and n-6 are important

  40. Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and n-3 Fatty Acids • Possible biological pathway: • Vasoconstriction and epithelial damage of HDP is associated with imbalance of TXA2 (vasoconstrictor) and PGI2 (vasodilator) • If increased dietary intake of n-3: • EPA competes with Arachadonic Acid for enzymes so may have lower production of TXA2 and higher production of PGI3 (vasodilator)

  41. HDP and n-3 Fatty Acids • Epidemiological Studies: • several studies have found that women with HDP have lower levels of n-3 • lower incidence of HDP in fish eating populations • RCT • “Compelling evidence for a beneficial effect of n-3 fatty acids on preeclampsia from recent prospective, double-blind studies is lacking (Jensen, Am J Clin Nutr, 2006)

  42. Marine oil, and other prostaglandin precursor, supplementation for pregnancy uncomplicated by pre-eclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction,(Cochran Collaboration, 2006) • Six trials, involving 2783 women • Results for pregnancies randomized to supplements: • Mean gestation 2.6 days longer • Lower risk of birth <34 weeks (RR=0.69, 0.49-0.99) • Birthweight slightly greater (47 g) • no overall differences between the groups in the proportion of LBW or SGA babies • No clear difference RR of pre-eclampsia between the two groups • Conclusion: “There is not enough evidence to support the routine use of marine oil, or other prostaglandin precursor, supplements during pregnancy to reduce the risk of pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, low birthweight or small-for-gestational age.”

  43. N-3 and Prolonged Gestation • Faroe Islands: • high birthweights • longer gestations • diet high in marine oils • Theory: n-3 interference with uterine prostaglandin production

  44. N-3 and Prolonged Gestation • Supplementation study: • increased gestational length by 4 days • prolonged bleeding times & increased blood loss at delivery

  45. N-3 intake and Depression by Country (Hibbeln, AJCN, 2006) • In model with 20 countries, correlation between postpartum depression rates and energy from n-3 FA was r=-0.78, p<0.001)

  46. N-3 intake and Depression by Country (Hibbeln, AJCN, 2006)

  47. N-3 and Maternal Depression (Jensen, AJCN, 2006) • “Recent observational trials and open-label trials of n-3 FA supplementation appears promising.” • “At present, however, there is a paucity of data from controlled studies supporting the efficacy of n-3 FA in the prevention or treatment of depression during pregnancy or the postpartum period.”

  48. Michael Crawford, Director, Institute for Brain Chemistry and Human Nutrition, London • http://www.seafoodandhealth.org/index.php?section=20&id=277 “…the brain case of this little one-year-old fellow is nearly the same size as the mother’s. What that tells you is that the priority of human development is the brain; it’s not the body. Look at the size of the child’s hand compared to the mother’s. We know all about this, and I’m not going to dwell on it, but the priority is unquestionably, in homo sapiens, the brain. Physiological requirement is the brain, nutritional requirement priority is the brain, and the brain is made of lipids, so we’ve got to get these lipids to make our brains.’

  49. Key Points of Crawford’s Presentation • Humans evolved and thrived near water with access to DHA • EU report that cost of “brain disorders” has overtaken all other costs of ill health and there are predictions that mental health will be in the top three burdens of ill health for the world by 2020 • We need to restore the food chain to give better balance of n-3 to n-6 • We need to invest in the ocean

More Related