1 / 8

Chemical Reaction Equilibrium SVNA 13

Chemical Reaction Equilibrium SVNA 13. If sufficient data exist, we can describe the equilibrium state of a reacting system. If the system is able to lower its Gibbs energy through a change in its composition, this reaction is favourable.

shasta
Download Presentation

Chemical Reaction Equilibrium SVNA 13

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chemical Reaction Equilibrium SVNA 13 • If sufficient data exist, we can describe the equilibrium state of a reacting system. • If the system is able to lower its Gibbs energy through a change in its composition, this reaction is favourable. • However, whether or not a reaction will occur in a finite period of time is a question of reaction kinetics. • There are several industrially important reactions that are both rapid and “equilibrium limited”. • Synthesis gas reaction • production of methyl-t-butyl ether (MBTE) • In these processes, it is important to know the thermodynamic limit of the reaction extent under different operating conditions.

  2. Reaction Extent • Given a feed composition for a reactive system, we are most interested in the degree of conversion of reactants into products. • A convenient measure is the reaction extent, e. • Consider the following reaction: • In terms of stoichiometric coefficients: • where, nCH4 = -1, nH20 = -1, nCO = 1, nH2 = 3 • For any change in composition due to this reaction, • 13.2 • where de is called the differential extent of reaction.

  3. Reaction Extent • Note that: • (i=1,2,…,N) 13.3 • The extent of reaction is zero before the reaction starts. • We can integrate 13.3 from the start from the start of the reaction to find the number of moles of any species in terms of  • so that • 13.4 • How does this help us?

  4. Reaction Extent and Mole Fractions • Relating the reaction extent to mole fractions is accomplished by calculating the total number of moles in the system at the given state. • Where, • Mole fractions for all species are derived from: • 13.5 • What happens if there is an inert component in the reaction mixture?

  5. Multiple Reactions and the Reaction Extent • The reaction extent approach can be generalized to accommodate two or more simultaneous reactions. • For j reactions of N components: • (i=1,2,…,N) • and the number of moles of each component for given reaction extents is: • 13.6 • and the total number of moles in the system becomes: • where we can write:

  6. Chemical Reaction Equilibrium Criteria • To determine the state of a • reactive system at equilibrium, • we need to relate the reaction • extent to the total Gibbs • energy, GT. • We have seen that GT of a • closed system at T,P • reaches a minimum at • an equilibrium state: • Eq. 14.64 [14.68]

  7. Reaction Extent and Gibbs Energy • Consider a single-phase system in which chemical reactions are possible. • Changes in Gibbs energy resulting from shifts in temperature, pressure and composition are described by the fundamental equation: • At constant temperature and pressure, this reduces to: • and the only means the system has to lower the Gibbs • energy is to alter the number of moles of individual • components. • Let’s relate the changes in moles to the reaction extent.

  8. Criterion for Chemical Equilibrium • For a single chemical reaction, we can apply equation 13.3 which relates the reaction extent to the changes in the number of moles: • 13.3 • Substituting for dni in the fundamental equation yields: • At equilibrium at constant T and P, we know that d(nG)/d, = 0. Therefore, • 13.8

More Related