ISD Directors/OSE Leadership Meeting

1. ISD Directors/OSE Leadership Meeting March 19, 2013 Greater Lansing Association of Realtors

2. Welcome & IntroductionsAgenda Review Rugg Dozzi

3. State and Federal ForecastsAsked & Answered Eleanor White

4. OSE Updates • Priority Schools moving to the EAA • EAA Update • Monitoring and Technical Assistance Team…name change from CIMS Team

5. Performance Reporting Jessica Brady Oren Christmas Julie Trevino

8. State Performance Plan Improvement Activities • OSEP’s New Direction • Results Driven Accountability (RDA) • Increased attention to all indicators • Expanding improvement activities

9. State Performance Plan Improvement Activities • OSE’s New Direction • Student centered • More results driven • Impact several indicators • Useable to the field

10. State Performance Plan Improvement Activities • Timelines • December 2013 - Review & revise • January 2014 - Added to the SPP/APR • January 2015 – Results reported in APR

11. Public Reporting • Mid-May District Preview Period • Is currently being developed • Will reside on the MI School Data Portal • Will have the look and feel of the Data Portraits • May 29th Public Reports goes live

12. Monitoring & Technical Assistance Jessica Brady

13. General Supervision Monitoring (GSM) • Pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 2004, §§300.600 and 300.149(a)(1)(2), and the Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education (MARSE), R 340.1839, the Office of Special Education (OSE) must ensure the educational programs for students with disabilities are administered in accordance with federal and state standards.

14. General Supervision Monitoring GOALS • Conduct cyclical reviews of locals within each of the 56 Intermediate School Districts. • Collaborate with other OSE units: Finance, Program Accountability, Performance Reporting.

15. General Supervision Monitoring SELECTION CRITERIA • Random selection of 1-2 locals from each ISD • From the district list • Eliminate locals that are being monitored in the current cycle • Select from locals that have not had a previous monitoring activity • If none remain, select from locals that have not had a monitoring activity in the past 4 years • If none remain, select randomly.

17. CIMS Coordinator and ISD Monitor • ISD Monitor’s may be CIMS Coordinator’s for their ISD and any local in the district. • Best practice is for the CIMS Coordinator in a local to be an employee of the local district. • CIMS Coordinator’s who are not ISD Monitor’s receive technical assistance from the ISD Monitor.

18. B-7 (Preschool Skills) • Starting with the April 15 workbook in the Continuous Improvement Monitoring System Results Transmittals will be issued for B-7 • A local will receive a Results Transmittals if the district did not reach the target for any of the subparts of Indicator 7

19. B-7 Continued • April 18, 2013- data workshop in Escanaba- register online at www.eotta.ccresa.org/ • There are trainings on Child Outcomes being held throughout the State. Register online at www.eotta.ccresa.org/

20. B-12 (Early Childhood Transition) • Data for this indicator was previously submitted in MiCIS • Is currently submitted in MSDS (first year) • If there are data issues/problems, they will be handled as they arise

21. Side-By-SidePart C/Part B Teri Johnson

25. Program Finance John Andrejack

26. SEQUESTRATION March 19, 2013 Approp. DoneApprop. In ProgressApprop. Not Started 1st Sequester 2nd Sequester 3rd Sequester Federal Appropriation 7/1/12 (10/1/12 7/1/13) (10/1/13 7/1/14) (10/1/14 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ Federal Award (7/1/12 10/1/12) (7/1/13 10/1/13) (7/1/14 10/1/14) Not Impacted Impacted

27. TA/PD System Design Teri Johnson

28. Key Principles for ESEA • College and Career Ready expectations • State developed systems of differentiated recognition, accountability and support • Support effective instruction and leadership • Reduce duplication

29. What’s TA and PD? Professional Development (PD) Technical Assistance (TA) Supports the implementation of new skills Broad in nature Accounts for variability within a system Customized to meet the needs of the consumer • Introduces new skills • Focuses on specific learning (particular approach, piece of software, etc.) • More standardized approach

30. Multi-Tiered Approach to TA & PD

31. A New Standard Compliance Results Outcomes Grades Marks Consequences Scores • Obedience • Agreement • Conformity • Accordance • Submission

32. The Future of Improvement Activities • College and Career Ready is the ultimate goal for ALL students. • Providing meaningful results in light of proven and effective strategies is essential to improving student achievement. • Utilizing the SPP as a resource to assist districts in their work to improve outcomes for students with disabilities is a NEW focus of our work.

33. Closing thoughts… “It is better to take many small steps in the right direction than to make a great leap forward only to stumble backward.” ― Louis Sachar

34. Program Accountability Sheryl Diamond

35. Updates • Current rule package • Public posting of state complaints • New complaint procedure • ISD Plan workgroup status

36. MI School Data Portal Paul Bielawski

37. Parking LotHot Topics Rugg Dozzi

38. Reminders/Forecasts • Electronic Evaluation for today • Next Meeting: • May 15, 2013 LCC West Campus 5708 Cornerstone Dr. Lansing, MI 48917