1 / 17

Global Area Network (GAN) Concept

Global Area Network (GAN) Concept. Jun Hirano*, Tan Pek Yew**, Takashi Aramaki* <Jun.Hirano@yrp.mci.mei.co.jp> <pytan@psl.com.sg> <Takashi.Aramaki@yrp.mci.mei.co.jp> Matsushita Communication*, Panasonic Singapore Lab.**. Abstract. Market requires more functionalities and performance.

shelley
Download Presentation

Global Area Network (GAN) Concept

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Global Area Network (GAN) Concept Jun Hirano*, Tan Pek Yew**, Takashi Aramaki* <Jun.Hirano@yrp.mci.mei.co.jp> <pytan@psl.com.sg> <Takashi.Aramaki@yrp.mci.mei.co.jp> Matsushita Communication*, Panasonic Singapore Lab.** Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  2. Abstract • Market requires more functionalities and performance. • Current requirements discussed in WNG are not enough. • Global Area Network (GAN) concept depicts more requirements. • GAN concept is proposed for discussion base within WNG. Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  3. Market Prediction Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  4. Current Discussions • 802.11a High Data Rate • 3G interworking • Multi-hop bridging Is that enough??? Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  5. GAN concept • WWAN/WLAN/WPAN integration = GAN. • The more scenarios, the more requirements. Office Home On the Move Train Hot Spot City Centre Easy Pass Car PAN Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  6. Scenario: Home • Higher bandwidth • Higher security • Plug and Play • AV streaming • Low cost • Ad-hoc Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  7. Scenario: Corporate (Office) • Higher bandwidth • Higher security • Portability (Nomadic service) • Network management Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  8. Scenario:Public • Accounting • Subscriber identification • Service level agreement / QoS • Higher security • Authentication • Encryption • Network management Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  9. Scenario:Public (Hot Spot) • Seamless mobility • Inter/Intra hot spot • Inter operator • Inter system “hot spot” and “Cellular” • Terminal identification: IPv6? • Higher security Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  10. Scenario: Public (Car) • Higher mobility • High speed • Less predictable • Location information: GPS? • Reliability • Temperature • Shock resistance Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  11. Scenario: Public (Train) • Higher mobility • High speed • Predictable • Many users • High density • Move simultaneously • Handover nightmare • Seamless roaming • Inter/Intra train • Inter train and platform • Inter train operator Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  12. Scenario: Public (On the Move) • Seamless roaming • Cellular deployment • Hot spot + 3G • Inter scenario roaming Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  13. Scenario: Public (City Centre) • Features for “hot spot” and “on the move” plus… • Match making • One time communication • Ad-hoc? • Anonymous communication • Privacy • Special interest group • Location based services Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  14. Scenario: Public (Easy Pass) -car,ticket,door,PC- • Quick authentication • Strong security Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  15. Scenario: PAN • Functionality integration • e.g. PAN devices plus WAN functionality (PDA plus cell-phone) • Plug and Play Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  16. Open Questions • Do we want single standard and/or Roamable standards? Either or Both? • Do we have more scenarios? • Airplane? Rural area? Under the sea/ground? In the space? • Do some of us need to stick to universal service? • Some operators yes…? • Do we need to collaborate with other bodies such as 3GPP, IETF, etc. • Are we talking “When”? • Spectrum discussion? • ISM bands? UWB? 5GHz? New bands? Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

  17. Conclusion • Market requires more functionality and performance. • Current requirements discussed in WNG are not enough. • GAN concept depicts more requirements. • Global seamless roaming • High mobility • GAN concept is proposed with open questions for discussion base within WNG. Jun Hirano, Matsushita Communication

More Related