1 / 14

MEXUSGULF TTX 2016 -- Update

MEXUSGULF TTX 2016 -- Update. Mike Sams USCG District 8. Mike Drieu Anadarko. &. TTX Overview. Scenario Location Agenda Objectives Schedule Participants Deliverable. MEXUSGULF WS 2015. Galveston. Port Fourchon. 274 Miles. 236 Miles. Corpus Christi. 338 Miles.

sherripeterson
Download Presentation

MEXUSGULF TTX 2016 -- Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MEXUSGULF TTX2016 -- Update Mike SamsUSCG District 8 Mike Drieu Anadarko &

  2. TTX Overview • Scenario • Location • Agenda • Objectives • Schedule • Participants • Deliverable MEXUSGULF WS 2015

  3. Galveston Port Fourchon 274 Miles 236 Miles Corpus Christi 338 Miles

  4. Exercise ObjectivesModule 2: Organizational Design • Notifications: • Discuss ability and process to make proper notifications of an oil spill in accordance with: • Anadarko’s Oil Spill Response Plan (OSRP) for US requirements; and, • Mexico – US (MEXUS) Plan for spill impacting, or potentially impacting Mexico waters. • Incident Command Post: • Discuss the selection process for choosing the locations of separate Command Posts (one in each country). • Spill Management Team: • Discuss ability for the Responsible Party, their respective Spill Management Team, & Oil Spill Removal Organizations (OSRO) to provide adequate support to each Command Post. • Regional Response Team Interactions: • Discuss efficient interaction between Regional Response Team (RRT), MEXUSGULF Joint Response Team (JRT), & respective Unified Commands in US/MX. RRT-6 involvement will include subsea dispersant use process/protocols.

  5. Exercise ObjectivesModule 3: Operational Response • Source Control: • Discuss ability to effectively stop or control the source, and minimize the total volume released from an uncontrolled well blowout. • Response Strategies and Tactics: • Discussresponse strategies and tactics to support response efforts. • Discuss trigger points for response strategies and tactics used near themaritime boundary line; e.g., surface and subsea dispersants, in-situburning, etc.

  6. Exercise ObjectivesModule 4: Response Support • Communication: • Discuss ability to effectively communicate between both Command Posts (using SEMAR & USCG liaisons). • Response Information Sharing: • Discuss the use of Response Information Sharing to communicate and share key information between US and Mexico Command Posts, and between Source Control Branch and other response positions within the US Response Management System. • Trans-border Resource Movements:  • US:  Discuss U.S Customs & Border Protection requirements for allowingequipment and personnel to enter US when an emergency occurs (land &maritime), and determine who from US will ensure safe and securepersonnel & equipment movement. • MX:  Discuss Mexico requirements for allowing equipment and personnel to enter Mexico when an emergency occurs (land & maritime), and determine who from the Mexican government will ensure safe and secure personnel & equipment movement.

  7. U.S. Participants Federal: • USCG Headquarters (CG-MER-2) • USCG Eighth District (D8) • USCG Eleventh District (D11) • USCG Exercise Support Division • USCG Gulf Strike Team (GST) • USCG Sector Corpus Christi • USCG Sector Houston-Galveston • USCG Marine Safety Unit Morgan City • Customs & Border Protection (CBP) • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 (EPA) • U.S. Department of State (DOS): • Department of Commerce (DOC): • Scientific Support Coordinator (SSC) • U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI): • Bureau of Safety & Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) • U.S. National Park Service (NPS)

  8. U.S. Participants State:-Texas General Land Office (TGLO) -Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office (LOSCO)Industry (RP): -Anadarko Petroleum Corporation (APC) -Marine Spill Response Corporation (MSRC)-Clean Gulf Associates (CGA)-Marine Well Containment Company (MWCC)

  9. MX Participants Federal: • Secretariat of Navy (SEMAR) Zone One (ZN-1) • Secretariat of the Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT) / Agency for Safety, Energy, and Environment (ASEA) State: • Mexican Customs – Altamira Mexico • Port Authority of Altamira • University of Tamaulipas (UAT- CIDIPORT)

  10. FSE Planning/Follow-up Last Meeting • APC plans to deploy equipment at two locations recommended by this Area Committee • Initial discussions suggested a few areas on GRPs that have not been validated • Need areas identified by 1 June 2016 to allow for budget and planning with MSRC and CGA

More Related