1 / 22

One Laptop Per Child – the View from 1978

Basser Seminar 26 July 2009 Basser School of Information Technology University of Sydney Lee Felsenstein Fonly LLC Palo Alto, California lee@fonlyinstitute.com. One Laptop Per Child – the View from 1978. What do you mean “revolution?”. Event that: Overthrows an existing order

silver
Download Presentation

One Laptop Per Child – the View from 1978

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Basser Seminar 26 July 2009 Basser School of Information Technology University of Sydney Lee Felsenstein Fonly LLC Palo Alto, California lee@fonlyinstitute.com One Laptop Per Child – the View from 1978

  2. What do you mean “revolution?” • Event that: • Overthrows an existing order • Involves efforts of large numbers of people • Opens long-term possibilities in an unexpected manner

  3. What Existing Order? • The Computer Priesthood • IBM hegemonic • Large machines – high cost • Proprietary software, OS, hardware, support • Software prepared by experts to lessor's specifications • “End User” always a business or government agency

  4. Opening shot - TV Typewriter (1973) • Build-it-yourself article • Complex documentation sent to interested correspondents ($2 fee) • Normal response – 20 • 10,000 paid responses! • Large pent-up demand • But for what?

  5. Ideology - “Computer Lib” • Ted Nelson (1974) • Modeled after Whole Earth Catalog • “You Can and Must Understand Computers NOW” • Started thousands off to learn about hardware and software

  6. Breakthrough - Altair (1975) • Incomplete kit offered for less than cost of CPU chip • Runaway best seller • Users embarked upon learning project of unknown duration and scope • Nearly empty box

  7. Clubs and Shared Software • Necessary mutual teaching • Software seen as means to end of having working computer • Altair Basic widely shared – became the standard despite Gates' complaints

  8. Interoperability - CP/M • Gary Kildall, PhD (pictured) • Allowed software to run on various computers • Enabled the personal computer industry (Harold Evans) • No computer company had previously seen the point

  9. Interactivity • Shared Memory Display (VDM-1 shown) enabled fast user interaction • Computer games! • Visi-Calc spreadsheet arguably an interactive computer accounting game • No computer company had previously seen the point

  10. Growth and Triumph – IBM opens up • 1976 – Sol-20 (complete system) • 1977 – Apple II (graphics) • 1981 – Osborne (portability, bundled SW) • 1981 – IBM-PC – adopts open architecture

  11. OLPC definition – basics 1 • Originated by Prof. Nick Negroponte • Inspired by Cambodian kids using laptops in school sponsored by N. & E. Negroponte • Premise – Education is only way out of poverty • Premise – Only way to educate kids is to give them all laptops • Premise – Laptops alone, if designed right, will be sufficient to effect education • “Constructionist” (Papert & Kay) methodology • Children will explore world, “learn learning”

  12. OLPC definition – basics 2 • Implementation • Design superior laptop • Secure agreements with heads of state for massive purchases • Require all children be given a laptop • Manufacture in million increments • Drive price down to $100 • Done!

  13. OLPC - Assumptions • Mesh networking will compensate for lack of network access • Software applications will appear from 3rd parties • Crank- or pull-string-power generation will supply sufficient power • Colorful motif will prevent theft and black-market sale of computers • Teachers will “get out of the way” • Parents will not interfere

  14. OLPC – hidden corrolaries • No research • “Enough is known already” • Ethnographic research eschewed (IDEO) • No existing body of data referenced • No research report from Cambodian village exists • No pilot projects • Full-scale implementation or nothing • No implementation plan

  15. OLPC – what could go wrong? • Heads of state cannot dictate to education ministries • Bureaucracy has mass and inertia • India Ed. Min. declares OLPC “pedagogically suspect” • Infrastructure not included • Generator an afterthought • Network backhaul left to chance • Constructionism not shown to be effective • Talented teachers required

  16. OLPC – the View From 1978 • There's been a revolution overthrowing the order: • of system definition and implementation by priesthoods • Operating under cover of hierarchies • Surrounded by ramparts of propaganda • Unquestioned and unexamined • of institutions defined as end users... • ...and individuals simply subject to the results

  17. OLPC – the View From 1978 • The age of the Magic Machine is over • People know: • where software comes from • that submission is not required • that the priesthood is composed of mortals • People are as pragmatic as ever • They want to know how the new machine will help them, their families, their communities

  18. Kay's Hierarchy • Hardware • Software • User Interface • Courseware • Mentoring • Each step harder than the one before • “We should have started at the top and worked down” - Alan Kay, Tunis 2005

  19. Negroponte on OLPC over time • “This is an education project. It is not a laptop project.” - Sept. 2005 • “...we remain firmly committed to our mission of getting laptops to children in developing countries.” - Jan. 2009

  20. OLPC – out of the wreckage • Only projects running are pilots • www.olpcnews.com • OLPC has spun off software – Sugar Labs • www.sugarlabs.org • More than 100,000 XO-1 laptops sold in US and Western countries (Give1, Get 1 – 2007 and 2008) • Needed – connections between education geeks and computer geeks with XO-1's to work on top levels of Kay's hierarchy.

  21. Some Interesting Needs • A device to permit learners to achieve basic literacy in their own language on a standalone basis (no network needed) • A device to permit learners to achieve basic proficiency in arithmetic (no network needed) • A basic electronic book • A system for network availability supported by telecommunications revenues (village telecentre) • A system for battery charging without mains power (Low-power village power utility)

  22. Pursue the Hands-On Imperative!

More Related