1 / 17

Networking Behavior in Thin Film and Nanostructure Growth Dynamics

Networking Behavior in Thin Film and Nanostructure Growth Dynamics. Murat Yuksel U of Nevada – Reno CSE Department yuksem@cse.unr.edu. Hasan Guclu Los Alamos National Lab Complex Systems Group guclu@lanl.gov. Tansel Karabacak U of Arkansas – Little Rock Applied Science Department

simone
Download Presentation

Networking Behavior in Thin Film and Nanostructure Growth Dynamics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Networking Behavior in Thin Film and Nanostructure Growth Dynamics Murat Yuksel U of Nevada – Reno CSE Department yuksem@cse.unr.edu Hasan Guclu Los Alamos National Lab Complex Systems Group guclu@lanl.gov Tansel Karabacak U of Arkansas – Little Rock Applied Science Department txkarabacak@ualr.edu IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  2. Talk Outline • Motivation: Dynamic Effects in Growth • A Network Modeling Approach • Initial Results • Future Work IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  3. Motivation: Deposition Techniques IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  4. Motivation: Dynamic Effects in Growth • A typical thin film and nanostructure growth involves four main dynamic effects: • shadowing • surface diffusion • reemission • noise • Characterizing these effects is vital to understand the shapes of nanostructures IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  5. Motivation: Dynamic Effects in Growth root-mean-square roughness = time Theoretical models (e.g., dynamic scaling) have not been able explain growth behavior well.. IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  6. Motivation: Dynamic Effects in Growth Monte Carlo simulations have been able to explain growth behavior well.. Fundamental Questions: Can we explain the growth behavior in simple theoretical terms? Are there any universal behaviors in the growth process? IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  7. A Network Modeling Approach… • Key Idea: Use the simulations data to map the growth process to a corresponding network model. • For now, we focus on the reemission and shadowing effects, as they are the dominant ones. A reemitting particle means that there is a “relationship” between the starting and ending points of the reemission. IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  8. A Network Modeling Approach… • cluster-based • mainly models shadowing effects • defined based on the current surface morphology • granularity matters.. • What is a “node”? • grid-based • raw grid points hill valley IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  9. A Network Modeling Approach… • What is a “link”? • mainly models the reemission effect • unidirectional vs. bidirectional • again, granularity matters.. • possible to classify the nodes: • source (hill), sink (valley), routers IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  10. A Network Modeling Approach… • Several more abstractions are possible • link capacity: maximum # of particles that can physically reemit from point A to point B on the surface • link propagation delay: physical distance between point A to point B • traffic: particles/time  bits/time • The challenge is to illustrate physical meanings to these abstractions.. IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  11. Initial Results • Looked at thin film growth simulations • Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) • surface size: 512 x 512 lattice units • two different sticking coefficients: s=0.1, s=0.9 • simulated reemission, shadowing, and noise effects • Network model • assumed each lattice unit on the 512 x 512 grid is potentially a node • took four snapshots at different surface thicknesses during the simulation • each snapshot is the network corresponding to the trajectories of 10 x 512 x 512 particles (adatoms) IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  12. Initial Results • Grown surfaces at different thicknesses and their corresponding network models • s=0.9 IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  13. Degree distribution converges to the same for both sticking coefficients! Degree distribution converges to the same for both sticking coefficients! Initial Results • Degree distributions: • mainly Exponential, becomes power-law-like as time goes by IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  14. Initial Results Non-intuitive insight: degree distribution is virtually the same for surfaces grown with different sticking coefficients! IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  15. Initial Results Distance distributions are clearly power-law! IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  16. Future Work • How does the granularity affect? • cluster-based network modeling • diffusion effect IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

  17. THE END Thank you! IEEE Nano-Net, Catania, Italy

More Related