240 likes | 260 Views
CV-SHARP Brief. 1 January 2018. Agenda. CV-SHARP Review. Agenda Overview Program Foundations Data Flow Methodology. THIS IS AN INFORMATIONAL BRIEF. Overview - What is CV-SHARP?. CV-SHARP Afloat SIPRNET Web application Captures completions of Sub-Events dictated in the CVN-TRAMAN
E N D
CV-SHARP Brief 1 January 2018
Agenda CV-SHARP Review Agenda Overview Program Foundations Data Flow Methodology THIS IS AN INFORMATIONAL BRIEF
Overview - What is CV-SHARP? • CV-SHARP Afloat • SIPRNET Web application • Captures completions of Sub-Events • dictated in the CVN-TRAMAN • No Reactor Requirements • No Equipment • Displays level of training ‘Experience’ and Performance’ vs. TRAMAN • Reports to: CV-SHARP Ashore, DRRS-N T-Pillar
Program Foundations • T&R Matrix – Sub-events per phase standards • Each sub-event has phase targets and periodicities (Learn / Maintain / Degrade) • Team-based with individual crediting • E consists of ‘reps & sets’ • Degrades over time; crew turnover (individual impacts) • P externally assessed with periodicity (unit-based) • Enabled through TACs (TYCOM-controlled) • FXP format abandoned (lacked NMETL conditions and standards) • Compendium of CNAF best standards and practices • “Crawl, walk, run” approach at ship’s discretion • CVN leadership oversight • Crew’s training readiness and ‘depth on the bench’
CVN TRAMAN - Appendix 1 EXPERIENCE Experience builds from phase to phase (and event to event). To grow from an Experience level of 1 to 9 (as required during TSTA), the event must be scheduled eight times within the Learning interval (14 days) for each watch and then maintained by repeating every 60 days (the Maintenance interval). CV SHARP documents Experience and Performance
CV-SHARP Functions • Internal – Comprehensive T & R management tool • Captures training completed at Team level • Individuals receive ‘Experience’ credit as part of the Watch Team • Team ‘Experience’ rolls up to Sub-Event/Department • Can be viewed in Afloat via the Dept Experience Report • Internal management and decision making tool • “Who needs to do What” IAW TRAMAN Requirements • External - DRRS-N Training Pillar • Populates DRRS-N “T Pillar” • Team Experience x Sub-Event Performance (TFOM = Ef x Pf) rolls up to NTA/PRMAR • Fleet-wide readiness comparison FOCUS: TRAINING AT TEAM LEVEL
CVN Training Data Flow CV - SHARP (Afloat) • Internal T&R Management • Captures teams’ completion of Sub-Events with visibility down to individual Sailor “Raw” Sub-Event Completion Data for ALL teams + Assessment scores CV-SHARP Ashore NTIMS Ef & Pf Tfom • Aviation Data Warehouse hosts CV-SHARP Ashore • T&R Matrix residency • Calculates Ef and Pf • CV-SHARP data storage • Ef x Pf = Tfom • NTA mapping to METL • No normalizations applied • MET/PRMAR population by Tfom
Experience Hierarchy • Individuals • Receive Experience as part of Team • Teams • Complete and log Sub-Events • Sub-Event • Cumulative Team Experience • NTA/PRMAR Experience • Cumulative Sub-Event Experience • DRRS-N T-Pillar • Notional team Experience combined with Sub-Event Performance then mapped to NTAs (METL) for Unit Level Readiness depiction • Individual Experience • Earned when Team logs Sub-events Team Experience CV-SHARP Sub-Event Experience NTA/PRMAR Experience DRRS-N “T” Pillar (Ef x Pf)
Readiness Calculation - Current Methodology • Statistical sampling concept • Each Sub-Event has a Primary Team Type • Example: AAW 1001-Primary Team Type: Mission Planning • CV-SHARP assumption is that if the Primary Team Type did the Sub-Event, all the other Team Types also completed it. • CV-SHARP then uses that Sub-Event Completion date ICW the Learn/Maintain/Degrade periodicities to calculate Sub-Event E • Doesn’t account for required minimum number of Teams. Example: Damage Control teams usually require 10 teams for Experience. • Performance • All P Scores defaulted to 100% in DRRS-N and CV-SHARP
Future Notional Team Methodology - Delayed implementation Actual Watch Bill 3 Teams Required All Designated Watch Standers • Building Block for calculating Sub-Event E Level • Selects highest E from whole crew, not just watch team members • Optimizes lowest notional team score
Future Notional Team Methodology • Conducted by Team Types: • Bridge-Navigation 3 • Bridge-Officers 3 • NAV Brief 1 • Piloting 1 • Sea & Anchor-Nav 1 MOB-N 1301 Plan Navigation CV-SHARP will calculate notional teams for each of the 5 Team Types conducting the Sub-Event. It will take the lowest notional team score for each of the 5 Team Types and average those 5 scores to come up with the Sub-Event E Level.
Future Notional Team Methodology Notional Team Scores • Average worst notional Team Types • Bridge-Navigation 78 • Bridge-Officers 90 • NAV Brief 82 • Piloting 95 • Sea & Anchor-Navigation 91 • Sub-Event E for MOB-N 1301 • 87.2 Sent to DRRS-N as Sub-Event E Level
Future Notional Team Methodology MOB-N 1301 Sub-Event Team CV-SHARP Ashore DRRS-N MET PRMAR Nav Plotter QMOW Ind Bridge-Nav Piloting Ind NTA 1.2.11 Conduct Navigation MOB-N 70 86 Exp Perf 85% JL Phone Nav Radar Piloting Off Radar Log Shipping Off SPA-25G SSDS Console TOP Supervisor 90 90 100 100 80 100 100 100 MOB-N 1301 87 100 MOB-N 1311 75 90 MOB-N 1313 100 100 MOB-N 1314 100 90 MOB-N 1315 100 90 MOB-N 1325 75 80 MOB-N 1326 100 65 MOB-N 1327 100 100 MOB-N 1328 0 100 MOB-N 1341 100 100 Bridge Officers 70 100 100 OOD JOOD JOOW 100% NTA 1.1.1.7 93% NTA 1.1.2.3.1 85% NTA 1.1.2.3.2 87% NTA 1.2.6 83% NTA 1.2.11 77% NTA 1.3 100% NTA 6.1.1.12 70% 85% ATG Assessment Sea& Anchor-Nav NAV Brief 100 100 50 90 75 50 90 90 100 100 40 100 80 80 92 84% 92% 1st LT Air Boss CHENG Conn Fathometer Gun Boss Lee Helm Master Helm Gator OOD OPS O Piloting Off RO Shipping O QMOW 87% Aft Master Helm P Aft Master Helm S ANAV Bearing Taker 1 Bearing Taker 2 Bearing Taker 3 Bearing Taker 4 Gator Lee Helm Master Helm Nav Evaluator Nav Plotter Phone Talker 1 Phone Talker 2 Phone Talker 3 Phone Talker 4 80 90 80 90 100 100 100 100 90 90 100 100 90 90 90 65 NTA 1.2.11 Conduct Navigation = 77% Tfom E x P Average of lowest notional Team Type scores
Experience Analysis - Internal DEPT Experience Sub-Event Experience Team Type Experience Team Experience
Experience Analysis - Internal Individual Experience
Future Unit Performance (Pf) - Business Rules • Pf = Score ranges • 90-100% = 100 Pf; 80-89% = 90; < 80% = actual • Actual Scores used for Battle ‘E’ computations • Range Score used in DRRS-N Calculation for T-Pillar • Currently all Pf defaulted to 100% in DRRS-N
Performance Assessment External assessor (ATG) enters UNIT Sub-Event assessment scores (%) into CV-SHARP, which feeds DRRS-N
CV-SHARP – DRRS-N Alignment • PESTO Pillars – Training Drill Down
CV-SHARP – DRRS-N Alignment • PESTO Pillars – Training Drill Down Tabs Performance Factor Tab Experience Factor Tab
Takeaway Accurate logging Ensure all Team Types required for each Sub-Event are logging the training. Previous method of using only the Primary Team Type is being phased out. Accurate logging now will provide better E levels when the new calculation method is implemented.
CNAF T Pillar Leads • CV-SHARP Program Manager • LCDR Sean “Butterbean” Blackman sean.blackman@navy.mil • 619-545-0791 • LCDR Sean Lennon • Sean.lennon@navy.mil • 619-545-1547 Contractor Support Leads CNAL Customer Support MaxalexFequiere MFequiere@innovasi.com (757) 444-0419 • CNAP Customer Support • Ed Joiner • Edward.i.joiner.ctr@navy.mil (.smil.mil) • (619) 545-1549 • Other Customer Support email • CNAF_CVSHARPSUPPORT@navy.mil • CVSHARPsupport@innovasi.com • CNAF_CVSHARPSUPPORT@navy.smil.mil