160 likes | 309 Views
BCIS Annual Meeting London January 2006. Primary Angioplasty for Acute MI Who are the Stakeholders?. Dr Bernard Prendergast DM FRCP Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester UK. NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO DECLARE. Manchester Cardiac Services 2001. PCI projections Greater Manchester 2005-6.
E N D
BCIS Annual MeetingLondon January 2006 Primary Angioplasty for Acute MI Who are the Stakeholders? Dr Bernard Prendergast DM FRCP Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester UK NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO DECLARE
PCI projections Greater Manchester 2005-6 Population 3.8 million PCI @ 1050/million: 4000/annum Wythenshawe 1500 MRI 1750 DGH (250x3) 750
February:MRI commences 8am – 4pm primary PCI service for A&E patients. June:Greater Manchester Cardiac Board allows PCI Group to consider provision of a city wide service. September:Multidisciplinary process mapping meeting. October:Two day Network meeting attended by DOH representatives to establish a network PCI programme. November:“Primary PCI: The Challenge” – national UK conference (193 delegates). December:Invitation to submit a NIAP proposal. 2 year phased proposal signed by chief Executives of the two PCI centres, the Ambulance Trust and the Cardiac Network. February:Successful NIAP bid with six other UK centres. March / April:Meetings to discuss implementation of primary PCI proposals. April:Wythenshawe commences 8am – 4pm primary PCI service for A&E patients. June:A&EConsultants meeting. July:NMGH & Hope meeting. August:Stepping Hill Hospital meeting. September:Greater Manchester Ambulance Service commissioning meeting. October:Appointment of PCI Project Manager and Clinical Audit/Information Officer. November:3 initial pilot sites confirmed 2005 2004
Primary PCI StakeholdersThe Patient • Local vs. specialist care • Inequity of access to PPCI • When for my DGH? • Informed consent • Relatives • Confusion/bewilderment
Primary PCI StakeholdersThe Ambulance Service • Thrombolysis in Greater Manchester 2005 • CTS < 8 min 75% • CTD < 30 min 55% < 40 min 89% • CCG 86% • DTN < 20 min 64% < 30 min 88% • CTN < 60 min 82% Outstanding Issues Skills in ECG interpretation Impact on other emergency services Geographical imbalance of ambulance pool Alternative strategies for urban and rural populations
Primary PCI StakeholdersThe Referring DGH A&E Department • “Why should we replace optimal thrombolysis with an experimental PPCI service” • “What about our stars – we’re about to bid for foundation status, you know!” • “We’re not going back to the dark ages of assessment in the back of ambulances” • “Who’s responsible if the patient dies in transit?” • “We will need informed consent for transfer” • “This clinical trial – what about ethical approval?”
Primary PCI StakeholdersThe Catheter Lab TeamNurses, Radiographers, Technicians, AuditTeam, Activity Managers
Primary PCI StakeholdersThe DGH Cardiac Team • The backlog of ACS transfers is a greater day-to-day headache • Guaranteed repatriation at 24 hrs (and perhaps sooner) and need for altered nursing skill mix • Abbreviated IP stay diminishes time for Phase 1 rehabilitation and education • GPs may be unprepared or unwilling to cope • Limited exposure to AMI for doctors in training
Primary PCI StakeholdersThe Bed Manager Time spent in A&E Locker, T. E et al. BMJ 2005;330:1188-9.
3/12 waiting list target met as a priority Current mean wait 7-10 days (range 2-21 days) Constant pool of 40-50 patients awaiting transfer to tertiary care Primary PCI StakeholdersTertiary Centre NHS TrustsThe clinical/political conflict Elective Non-elective (ACS) Impact of primary PCI uncertain
Primary PCI StakeholdersHealthcare commissioners/Cardiac Network • Current activity projections are conservative and account only for elective and ACS work • In 2005-2006, a 40% reduced rate non-elective short stay tariff will apply for in-patient stays <48hrs* • Only in the NHS could attempts at increased efficiency be rewarded by diminished reimbursement!! • Who pays for: • Ambulance activity • Clopidogrel • Abciximab • etc, etc *Currently being addressed by DOH/BCS
To address: Logistic difficulties of providing a PPCI service Challenges in different geographical settings Robust data collection and audit Costs of service provision Patient’s experience of such a service Detailed outcome analysis Patient and carer experience Workforce implications Outcome using different models of service delivery Implementation and feasibility issues Economic evaluation Primary PCI StakeholdersThe Government/Department of Health THE NATIONAL INFARCT ANGIOPLASTY PROJECT British Cardiac Society and Department of Health - a joint project. AIMS OUTCOMES “Ultimately, a hybrid model of PPCI and pre-hospital thrombolysis seems likely.” Sue Dodd, DOH, Manchester November 2005.