1 / 25

Class Meeting Nov. 26, 2:00pm-4:45pm

Class Meeting Nov. 26, 2:00pm-4:45pm. Research I, 162. Geostrophic Approximations. Hydrostatic primitive equations Geostrophic approximation (diagnostic) In between (approximately geostrophic models) prognostic inertial-gravity waves filtered Planetary geostrophic approximation

snowy
Download Presentation

Class Meeting Nov. 26, 2:00pm-4:45pm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Class Meeting Nov. 26, 2:00pm-4:45pm Research I, 162

  2. Geostrophic Approximations • Hydrostatic primitive equations • Geostrophic approximation (diagnostic) • In between (approximately geostrophic models) prognostic inertial-gravity waves filtered Planetary geostrophic approximation Quasi-geostrophic approximation ……

  3. Planetary Geostrophic Approximation Momentum equation where Continuity Equation Vorticity Equation where Potential Vorticity Equation Basic condition L must be large, L~R, basin-scale movement

  4. Quasi-Geostrophic Approximation Quasi-geostrophic approximation has three components (1) The β-plane apporximation (2) Small surface deviation (3) Geostrophic approximation in terms of fo Basic condition

  5. Quasi-Geostrophic Approximation Potential Vorticity Quasi-Geostrophic Potential Vorticity Quasi-Geostrophic Potential Vorticity Equation Defines the evolution of geostrophic stream function ψ

  6. Quasi-Geostrophic Approximation If we ignore the surface change (or have a rigid lid), we have the absolute vorticity conservation, i.e.,

  7. Quasi-Geostrophic Approximation Momentum equation Continuity equation is ageostrophic flow • is responsible for the divergence in the QG system • has a rotational component • is totally determined by geostrophic flow at any given instance

  8. Assume geostrophic balance on -plane approximation, i.e., ( is a constant) Vertically integrating the vorticity equation barotropic we have The entrainment from bottom boundary layer The entrainment from surface boundary layer We have where

  9. Quasi-geostrophic vorticity equation and , we have For and where (Ekman transport is negligible) Moreover, We have where

  10. Quasi-Geostrophic Approximation Replace the relative vorticity by its geostrophic value Approximate the horizontal velocity by geostrophic current in the advection terms Under -plane approximation, f=fo+y, we have

  11. Boundary Value Problem Boundary conditions on a solid boundary L (1) No penetration through the wall   (2) No slip at the wall

  12. Quasi-geostrophic vorticity equation where Boundary conditions on a solid boundary L (1) No penetration through the wall (used for the case of no horizontal diffusion) along the boundary L (2) No slip at the wall along the boundary L n is the unit vector perpendicular to the boundary L

  13. Non-dimensionalize Quasi-Geostrophic Vorticity Equation Define non-dimensional variables based on independent scales L and o The variables with primes, as well as their derivatives, have no unit and generally have magnitude in the order of 1. e.g.,

  14. Note that U has not been decided yet.

  15. Non-dmensional vorticity equation If we choose we have Sverdrup relation Define the following non-dimensional parameters , nonlinearity. , , bottom friction. , , lateral friction. ,

  16. Interior (Sverdrup) solution If <<1, S<<1, and M<<1, we have the interior (Sverdrup) equation: (satistfying eastern boundary condition)  (satistfying western boundary condition) Example: Let , . Over a rectangular basin (x=0,1; y=0,1)

  17. Westward Intensification It is apparent that the Sverdrup balance can not satisfy the mass conservation and vorticity balance for a closed basin. Therefore, it is expected that there exists a “boundary layer” where other terms in the quasi-geostrophic vorticity is important. This layer is located near the western boundary of the basin. Within the western boundary layer (WBL), , for mass balance The non-dimensionalized distance is , the length of the layer  <<L In dimensional terms, The Sverdrup relation is broken down.

  18. The Stommel model Bottom Ekman friction becomes important in WBL. , S<<1. at x=0, 1; y=0, 1. No-normal flow boundary condition (Since the horizontal friction is neglected, the no-slip condition can not be enforced. No-normal flow condition is used). Interior solution

  19. Re-scaling in the boundary layer: , we have Let Take into As =0, =0. As ,I

  20. The solution for is , .  A=-B , ( can be the interior solution under different winds) For , , . For , , .

  21. The dynamical balance in the Stommel model In the interior,   Vorticity input by wind stress curl is balanced by a change in the planetary vorticity f of a fluid column.(In the northern hemisphere, clockwise wind stress curl induces equatorward flow). In WBL,   , Since v>0 and is maximum at the western boundary, the bottom friction damps out the clockwise vorticity. Question: Does this mechanism work in an eastern boundary layer?

More Related