1 / 17

Diagnostics (WBS 1.5) Yiping Feng

Diagnostics (WBS 1.5) Yiping Feng. Motivations System Specifications System Description WBS Schedule and Costs Summary. Motivations. X-ray Free-Electron Laser (FEL) is fundamentally different from storage-ring based synchrotron sources Linac-based, single-pass, 120 Hz at LCLS

sonora
Download Presentation

Diagnostics (WBS 1.5) Yiping Feng

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Diagnostics(WBS 1.5)Yiping Feng • Motivations • System Specifications • System Description • WBS • Schedule and Costs • Summary

  2. Motivations • X-ray Free-Electron Laser (FEL) is fundamentally different from storage-ring based synchrotron sources • Linac-based, single-pass, 120 Hz at LCLS • Feedback is limited by low repetition rate • Each macro electron bunch is different in timing, length, density, energy (velocity), orbit, etc. • X-ray amplification process based on self-seeding SASE* • Lasing starts from a random electron density distribution • Each X-ray pulse consists of a random time sequence of spikes of varying degrees of saturation • X-ray FEL exhibits inherent Intensity, spatial, temporal, and spectral fluctuations on pulse by pulse basis *Self Amplification of Spontaneous Emission

  3. Goals • X-ray diagnostics are required to measure these fluctuations since they can’t be eliminated • Integral parts of Instruments • Timing & intensity measurements for XPP experiments • Wave-front characterization for CXI experiments • Measurements made on pulse-by-pulse basis • Requiring real-time processing by controls and data system • Commonalities in needs & specs • Standardized and used for all applicable instruments • Modularized for greater flexibility of deployment and placement • Critical diagnostics must be performed and data made available on pulse-by-pulse basis

  4. Expected Fluctuations of LCLS FEL pulses *To be discussed in details in breakout session

  5. X-ray Diagnostics Suite

  6. System Specifications Technically more challenging * Must have high damage threshold

  7. Pop-In Intensity Monitor (WBS 1.5.3) • Coarse alignment of X-ray optics • monochromators, mirrors, lens, etc. • strategically placed in close proximity to optic • Detection technique • Pulse operation not photon counting • Sensor type • Si Diode (used successfully at SPPS) • CVD Diamond stages FEL Destructive; Retractable; Moderate dynamic range 104; Relative accuracy < 10-2; Per-pulse operation at 120 Hz; Si Diode

  8. Pop-In Position/Profile Monitor (WBS 1.5.2) • Coarse alignment of X-ray optics (beam finder) • Optical imaging of fluorescence from a scintillating screen • Positions in x, y • 2D intensity profile • Attenuation of beam may be required to avoid saturation • Two modes of operation: low and high resolutions stages CCD Camera Mirror Destructive; Retractable; At 50 mm resolution 25x25 mm2 field of view; At 10 mm resolution 5x5 mm2 field of view; FEL YAG Screen

  9. In-Situ Intensity/Position Monitor (WBS 1.5.4) Quad-sensor • Precise normalization of incident intensity to 0.1% • Critical to XPP experiments where small change in diffraction intensity need to be resolved, i.e. Bi coherent phonon decay after photo-excitation • Detection technique • Compton back scattering from Be thin foil (up to 108photons w/ 1012 in incident beam) • Precise beam position calibration w/ use of array of sensors to < 5 mm • Commercial fluorescence monitor using similar design provides equal resolution but not viable due to damage considerations • CVD diamond design more complex in fabrication FEL Be thin foil Transmissive (> 98% w/ 100 mm Be @ 8 keV); High dynamic range 106; Relative accuracy < 10-3 Position resolution < 5 mm; Per-pulse operation at 120 Hz;

  10. Electro-Optic Sampling Device (WBS 1.5.6) • Relative timing btw e-bunch & EOS-probe laser pulse • Inferring timing btw X-ray pulse & experimental probe laser • Based on (linear) Pockels effect • birefringence in strong E-field exerted by relativistic e-bunch in proximity • 1-D Spatial encoding of timing for detection using CCD • Single shot measurement • EOS technique proven at SPPS • 20 fs timing determination • 200 fs resolution for e-bunch length • Challenges • Long distance btw EOS location (LTU) & experiments (NEH) • 120 Hz operation requires real-time processing of EOS data EOS crystal Probe-laser footprint Non-intrusive to e-beam; Non-destructive; Per-pulse operation at 120 Hz;

  11. Hartmann Wave-front Sensor (WBS 1.5.5) • Characterization of wave-front of focused X-ray FEL is a challenge • Critical to CXI experiments if atomic resolution is ultimately to be achieved • Common scanning or direct imaging techniques made at focus not viable due to FEL high peak power • Hartmann Wave-front Sensor technique is viable • Measurement made far from focus • Focal point determination calculated from radius of curvature measurement • Wave-front distortion obtained by back-propagation of diffracted wave-front determined at mask plane • Commercial Hartmann wave-front for long wavelength • Successful in optical applications (adaptive optics, etc.) • For X-ray applications, X-EUV sensor for energy up to 4 keV • Needs modification for higher energies and 120 Hz operation

  12. Hartmann Wave-front Sensor (con’t) • Challenges • Working at 8 keV • Tighter technical specs at shorter wavelength • Mask must allow ray-optics approximation • New 8 keV version being developed & tested now • Mask materials must be compatible with FEL application • 120 Hz operation will require customization • Imaging sensor readout rate not sufficient • Use pixelated detector capable of 120 Hz operation • Integrate with Controls/Data systems Divergent wavefront Algorithm Image obtained from Imagine Optics, Ltd

  13. 1.5 WBS

  14. Diagnostics Schedule in Primavera 3.1

  15. Diagnostics Milestones CD-1 Aug 01, 07 Conceptual Design Complete Oct 24, 07 CD-2a Dec 03, 07 CD-3a Jul 21, 08 Phase I Final Design Complete Oct 24, 07 EOS monitor complete Oct 20, 08 Pop-in position/profiler 1st article Nov 25, 08 In-situ intensity/position 1st article Jan 21, 09 Pop-in intensity 1st article Apr 15, 09 Phase I Installation Complete Aug 21, 09 CD-4a Feb 08, 10

  16. Diagnostics Cost Estimate

  17. Summary • Concepts of all diagnostic devices are well developed • Frequent design discussions amongst LUSI and LCLS scientists • EOS device was successfully deployed at SPPS • 1st articles will help LCLS commissioning/operation and early sciences on LUSI instruments • LUSI EOS will aid LCLS e-beam diagnostics • LUSI BPM could aid LCLS e-beam fast feedback system • Ready to proceed with baseline cost and schedule development

More Related