180 likes | 323 Views
Understanding and Utilizing Professional Assessments. Presenters: Mary Deitch JD, Psy.D (Keystone Center ECU) Ron Neufeld B.S.W, L.A.D.A.C (Vanderbilt) AJ Reid Finlayson, M.D. (Vanderbilt). Objectives. Learn what a professional clinical assessment can tell you
E N D
Understanding and Utilizing Professional Assessments Presenters: Mary Deitch JD, Psy.D (Keystone Center ECU) Ron Neufeld B.S.W, L.A.D.A.C (Vanderbilt) AJ Reid Finlayson, M.D. (Vanderbilt)
Objectives • Learn what a professional clinical assessment can tell you • Learn how assessments are approached and the tools and techniques utilized • Learn how to use and understand reports and the information contained therein • Learn about different types of assessment
Why refer for assessment? • When a professional has been accused of inappropriate conduct • To gain clarity of the professional’s possible issues • For diagnostic clarification • To aid those in working with the professional understand potential problematic areas • To have an outside party’s perspective
How to frame a referral question • Have to understand what assessment can and can’t do • Can’t tell definitively if a situation occurred (e.g. guilt vs. innocence) • Can give you ideas and recommendations for the best way to approach a situation • Can give you ideas and recommendations about how best to approach therapy or boundary work
Referral Question cont • Many times the question involves assistance with treatment planning • Many times the question involves assistance with boundaries • Many times the question involves how to integrate the professional back to work • Many times the question involves how to manage the professional prior to returning to work and what would have to be achieved before returning to safe practice
Common Assessment Topics • Drug and Alcohol Concerns • Sexual compulsivity concerns (hypersexual disorder or paraphilic issues) • Boundary violations • Disruptive Physician • Other mental health concerns • Cognitive difficulties
Standard Assessment • While there are similarities amongst all professionals on how to conduct assessments, there is no “standard” in the field. • There are “shoulds” • There will be collateral interviews. This is where referral sources can be of assistance. • There will be personality, cognitive and emotional functioning • Both objective and projective • There will be good clinical interview(s)
Standards Cont • There will be a psychosocial history • There will be an assessment of current professional and personal stressors • Regardless of the referral question, there should still be some assessment of addiction issues as well as interpersonal issues
Keystone “Standard” • All clients get basic assessment which includes • WAIS-IV • MMPI-2 • Rorschach • Collateral Interview • Clinical Interview • BDI-2, BHS, BAI, HDQ, SAA, TSI
Keystone cont • Some clients will get extra assessments such as polygraph and AASI-2 and neuropsychological assessments
Vanderbilt “Standard” • MOCA • MMPI – 2 • PAI • Eqi • BDI, MAST, DAST, SAST, BVI, ACE, • Medical History and Physical Exam • Clinical interviews • Psychosocial interviews • Collateral contacts and documentation
Vanderbilt cont • Other possible assessment services include AASI, extensive neuropsychological testing, consultation with other medical specialties, and polygraph examination.
What to expect • Answer to referral question • Recommendations should be as specific as possible • E.g.: “this physician needs to be monitored” vs. “It is recommended that this physician be monitored by….” • E.g.: “this physician needs treatment” vs. “it is recommended that this physician seek treatment consisting of…”
How to understand the report • Typically set up similar: • Reason for referral • Testing Materials • Background Information • Behavioral Observations • Assessment Information • Cognitive • Personality and emotional functioning • Specialty assessment
How to read cont • Summary and or diagnosis • Recommendations
Case examples • 2-3 cases illustrating problems encountered during Fitness-for-Duty Evaluations will be briefly presented for discussion • Discussion around problem case situations • Need for more standardization to ensure quality of evaluation procedure • Forum for consultation / review of difficult cases
For further information • Ron and Reid- • Vanderbilt Comprehensive Assessment Program, for Professionals • 3rd floor VPH, Suite 3068 • 1601 23rd Ave. S.Nashville, TN 37212 • email: vcap@vanderbilt.edu • Phone numbers: • Office: (615) 322-4567 • Fax: (615) 322-7526 • Mary- • Keystone Center Extended Care Unit • 2000 Providence Ave • Chester PA 19013 • 800-733-6840 • Mary.deitch@uhsinc.com