680 likes | 791 Views
San Leandro Unified School Board. Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel Chaja, Assistant Director of Research and Program Evaluation. California Standards Test (CST). 2006 CSTs.
E N D
San Leandro UnifiedSchool Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel Chaja, Assistant Director of Research and Program Evaluation
Academic Performance Index(API) • Measures performance & progress based on results from statewide tests at grades 2-12 • Statewide tests include: • Numeric index from 200 to 1000 • API cycle includes API Base & API Growth • API Growth Target established as 5% of difference between API Base and 800
SLUSD API ResultsReported by District, School and Subgroup(2005-2006 API Cycle)
Comparative API Data Over a 4-Year PeriodAlameda County School Districts and High Schools
Student Subgroup API Growth Targets • Since 1999 API Growth Targets for numerically significant subgroups was 80 percent of the schoolwide target • Beginning with the 2006-2007 API Cycle calculations for numerically significant subgroups will parallel schoolwide target calculations
API By Student Subgroups • African American • Hispanic/Latino • EL Hispanic/Latino
API Subgroup Data: African American and Hispanic/Latino Students
Adequate Yearly Progress(AYP) Federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires states to reports results of each public school and school district Requirements: • Must meet annual targets that increase over time • Goal is 100% of students proficient in ELA and mathematics by 2013-2014 • Annual determination for schools and LEAs
AYP Components • Participation rate • Up to 11 different student subgroups • Two content areas • 22 ways • Percent proficient • Up to 11 different student subgroups • Two content areas • 22 ways • API • High school graduation rate
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)Percent Proficient ELA Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, and Elementary School Districts
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)Percent Proficient ELA High Schools and High School Districts
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)Percent Proficient Math Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, and Elementary School Districts
Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Percent Proficient Math High Schools and High School Districts
AMAOs for English Learners (ELs) • Performance objectives or targets that all school districts receiving Title III funds must meet • Must meet all three AMAOs • Two English language proficiency AMAOs calculated from the California English Language Development Test (CELDT) • One academic achievement AMAO based on AYP information
AMAO 1Percent Making Annual Progress in Learning English(CELDT Assessment) SLUSD 2005-2006 (57.5%)
AMAO 2Percent Attaining English Proficiency(CELDT Assessment) SLUSD 2005-2006 (37%)
AMAO 3 ELAMeeting AYP Requirements for the EL Subgroup at the District Level(CST, CAPA, CAHSEE Assessments) SLUSD 2005-2006 (35%)
AMAO 3 MathMeeting AYP Requirements for the EL Subgroup at the District Level(CST, CAPA, CAHSEE Assessments) SLUSD 2005-2006 (45%)
Program Improvement(PI) • Applies only to schools and school districts that receive federal Title I funds • Status assigned only if AYP targets were not met for 2 consecutive years within specific areas • Must implement additional federal requirements • Exiting PI status requires meeting AYP for 2 consecutive years