San Leandro Unified School Board

1. San Leandro UnifiedSchool Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel Chaja, Assistant Director of Research and Program Evaluation

2. California Standards Test(CST)

3. 2006 CSTs

11. ELA & Math CSTs By Ethnicity

12. ELA CST PERCENT PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

13. ELA CST PERCENT PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

14. Math CST Percent PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

15. Academic Performance Index(API) • Measures performance & progress based on results from statewide tests at grades 2-12 • Statewide tests include: • Numeric index from 200 to 1000 • API cycle includes API Base & API Growth • API Growth Target established as 5% of difference between API Base and 800

16. SLUSD API ResultsReported by District, School and Subgroup(2005-2006 API Cycle)

18. Comparative API Data Over a 4-Year PeriodAlameda County School Districts and High Schools

21. Student Subgroup API Growth Targets • Since 1999 API Growth Targets for numerically significant subgroups was 80 percent of the schoolwide target • Beginning with the 2006-2007 API Cycle calculations for numerically significant subgroups will parallel schoolwide target calculations

22. API By Student Subgroups • African American • Hispanic/Latino • EL Hispanic/Latino

23. Subgroup Percentage of Overall Student Population

26. API Subgroup Data: African American and Hispanic/Latino Students

29. Adequate Yearly Progress(AYP) Federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires states to reports results of each public school and school district Requirements: • Must meet annual targets that increase over time • Goal is 100% of students proficient in ELA and mathematics by 2013-2014 • Annual determination for schools and LEAs

30. AYP Components

31. AYP Components • Participation rate • Up to 11 different student subgroups • Two content areas • 22 ways • Percent proficient • Up to 11 different student subgroups • Two content areas • 22 ways • API • High school graduation rate

32. 2004-2007 Percent Proficient Targets

33. Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)Percent Proficient ELA Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, and Elementary School Districts

35. Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)Percent Proficient ELA High Schools and High School Districts

37. Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)Percent Proficient Math Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, and Elementary School Districts

40. Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Percent Proficient Math High Schools and High School Districts

42. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives(AMAOs)

43. AMAOs for English Learners (ELs) • Performance objectives or targets that all school districts receiving Title III funds must meet • Must meet all three AMAOs • Two English language proficiency AMAOs calculated from the California English Language Development Test (CELDT) • One academic achievement AMAO based on AYP information

44. AMAO 1Percent Making Annual Progress in Learning English(CELDT Assessment) SLUSD 2005-2006 (57.5%)

45. AMAO 2Percent Attaining English Proficiency(CELDT Assessment) SLUSD 2005-2006 (37%)

46. AMAO 3 ELAMeeting AYP Requirements for the EL Subgroup at the District Level(CST, CAPA, CAHSEE Assessments) SLUSD 2005-2006 (35%)

47. AMAO 3 MathMeeting AYP Requirements for the EL Subgroup at the District Level(CST, CAPA, CAHSEE Assessments) SLUSD 2005-2006 (45%)

48. Program Improvement(PI) • Applies only to schools and school districts that receive federal Title I funds • Status assigned only if AYP targets were not met for 2 consecutive years within specific areas • Must implement additional federal requirements • Exiting PI status requires meeting AYP for 2 consecutive years

49. San Leandro Unified School DistrictAYP

50. California High School Exit Exam(CAHSEE)