1 / 70

Institute for Science Study, RAS

Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011. Institute for Science Study, RAS. Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko. July, 2011, Vancouver, Canada. Russian Node Report July 2011 DR. Nadezhda Gaponenko

stellap
Download Presentation

Institute for Science Study, RAS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Institute for Science Study, RAS Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko July, 2011, Vancouver, Canada Russian Node Report July 2011 DR. Nadezhda Gaponenko Head of Department, Institute of Science Development Study under the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences Director, Russian Node of the Millennium Project Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Moscow, Obrutcheva str. 30A, 117485 foresightr@mail.ru

  2. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Activity 2010-2011 • State of the Future 2011 • Future of Media • Sectoral Innovation System: Theoretical foundations • Nanotechnology : Global Trends and Regional Strategies • Nanotechnology in the Russian Academy of Sciences • Climate Change and Food Security for OSCE with European Environmental Agency

  3. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 NANORUCERFraunhofer ISI & ISS RAS • Methodology • Building Knowledge Base • 10 databases of key Russian institutions in SISn (R&D organizations (more than 700), incubators (more than 30), nanocompanies (more than 400), venture funds, TTCs (more than 100), research infrastructure centers (more than 100),ect. • Two survey – R&D organizations & nanocompanies • 200 interviews – VF and BI • Mapping NN Activity • SIS Assessment • Roadmaps of collaborative Projects – 3 workshops

  4. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Advisory Board • CNRS, Moscow office • ROSNANO Corporation • RAS

  5. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 R&D organizations in NN database • Technology for information scanning, verification, filtering, and mapping was developed • Contact information • Location • Technological fields • Type of organization • Founding Year • R&D staffs • Facilities • Database opportunities

  6. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 SIS Assessment • Institutional Approach • Institutional capacity • Institutional gaps • Networking capacity and gaps • Evolutionary Approach • Workshops • Conference

  7. Future • NSF – special study in NN in Russia, memorandum of understanding • Skolkovo • Korea – memorandum of understanding • Finland

  8. Data bases of Russian “nano” R&D organizations, nanocompanies, venture funds, incubators, CCFU, TTC Survey of R&D organizations and nanocompanies More than 200 interviews with BI managers and VF&MC managers Statistical data of Russian State Committee for Statistics Departmental statistics of MES of the RF and Corporation RUSNANO Lux research, Cienifica U.S. NSF Nanoforum European Nanotechnology Gateway Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Institute for Science Study, RAS Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Sources of information Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Moscow, Obrutcheva str. 30A, 117485 foresightr@mail.ru

  9. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Institute for Science Study, RAS Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Specific Characteristics of SIS in Nanotechnology • Emerging, fragmented at the initial stage • With potential huge impact on NIS, structural shifts in economy, national competitiveness • Marked by the institutional gaps, setting up of new institutions and transformation of traditional ones, emergence of networks, learning regime and consolidation of technologies • Knowledge dynamic is an engine of SIS formation Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Moscow, Obrutcheva str. 30A, 117485 foresightr@mail.ru

  10. Knowledge base interdisciplinary cross-sectoral not coherent science field characterized by enormous thematic breadth Sectoral R&D system setting up of interdisciplinary nanotechnology centers and centers of excellence around the world expensive scientific infrastructure consequences of knowledge commercialization (both positive and negative) are not well explored Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Institute for Science Study, RAS Dr. Nadezhda Gapnenko Specific Characteristics of SIS in Nanotechnology Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Moscow, Obrutcheva str. 30A, 117485 foresightr@mail.ru

  11. Technology emerging disruptive science-based technology Nano-market emerging & fragmented fast developing Key actors are SMEs and spinoffs Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Institute for Science Study, RAS Dr. Nadezhda Gapnenko Specific Characteristics of SIS in Nanotechnology • Networks • interdisciplinary • overlapping Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Moscow, Obrutcheva str. 30A, 117485 foresightr@mail.ru

  12. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Institute for Science Study, RAS Dr. Nadezhda Gapnenko Building Balanced and Adoptive SIS Common measures implemented around the world • Orientation on institutional gaps • Setting up interdisciplinary research centers • Supporting information infrastructure • Investment in scientific infrastructure • Supporting networks building • Investment in human capacity building (training courses) • Coordination of actions between different departments – building system of governance • Nanotechnology safety for consumers • Standards for SISn • Measures implemented by RF are on line with measures implemented in other programs Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Moscow, Obrutcheva str. 30A, 117485 foresightr@mail.ru

  13. USA Orientation on dual technologies and high share of defense sector Orientation on molecular technologies European Union Development of Pan-European Nano – area Building nanotech platforms Public-private partnership Supporting spin-offs Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Institute for Science Study, RAS Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Building Balanced and Adoptive SIS(regions’ specific measures) Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Moscow, Obrutcheva str. 30A, 117485 foresightr@mail.ru

  14. Asia Pacific Nano-standardization initiatives (China) High share of defense sector (China) Development of comprehensive actions for the building balanced SISn Strong accents on commercialization (Taiwan) Latin America Millennium centers supported by World Bank (Brazil) Partnership with Lucent Technology (USA) for commercialization (Argentina) Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Institute for Science Study, RAS Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Building Balanced and Adoptive SIS(regions’ specific measures) Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Moscow, Obrutcheva str. 30A, 117485 foresightr@mail.ru

  15. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 • Measures are based on specific conditions and available capacity BUT at the same time outlined common measures are conditioned by specific nature of nanotechnology and particularities of SISn development at the embryonic stage

  16. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Dr. Nadezhda Gapnenko Russian SIS in Nanotech: institutional set up General Policy making Council for Science high tech& Innov. under the Speaker (2008) President of the RF State Duma Council of Federation Com. for Modern. and Technol. Develop. of Economy (2009) Coordinating Council for Nanotech Dev., Committee for Ed.& Science (2005) Public Council for Nanotech, Committee for S& high tech. (2008) Science, Innovation & Technology Policy Formulation and Financing Government Interdepartmental S&T Council for the Development Nanotechnology &Nanomaterials (2005) Governmental Commission for High Tech & Innov. (2008) Min. of Energy RUSNANO MES Min. of Ec. Affairs Min. of Def. Min. of Ind. & Trade Min. of Helth& Soc. Dev. Min. of Fin. Min. of ICT Fed. Space Agency. ROSATOM Corp RAS RAMS RAAS Regional Authorities Financial Infrastructure Public funds Private funds International funds Venture Funds Invested in Nanotech (14- 200) 7 Venture RUSNANO Funds Russian Foundation for Basic Research Foundation for Supporting Russian science (4) International S&T center Russian Foundation for Promotion of SMEs in S&T Funding agencies (72) Venture and investment foundations (79) Knowledge production Private R&D Organizations (60) EU-903 Germany - 311 Scientific infrastructure CCFU (128) EU-241 18- EU Germany -57 Public R&D organizations Academic research institute (201 329) Universities (279 574) Departmental R&D organizations (165) Networks NNN About 10 regional Sectoral product production EU-206 networks 417 company RUSNANO 94 companies EU- 943 SMEs & 214 major Comp. Total -1157 Knowledge transfer& commercialization Technoparks Center for technology Transfer (102) Incubators (33 -300) RUSNANO Nanocenters- 19 Special economic zones Dr. Nadezhda Gaponenko Moscow, Obrutcheva str. 30A, 117485 foresightr@mail.ru

  17. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 SISn Governance • In 2007, President Putin in NN Strategy put forward the task to develop the system of governance for Nanoindustry • Specialized Councils were set up in State Duma, Council of Federation • Interdepartmental S&T Council for the Development NN (2005) • Subcommeettee was set up in TIC of the RF • Commission of RAN for Nanotech development • Coordinating Expert Council for Nanotech development of RAMS • Commission for Modernization and Technol. Develop. of Economy under the President (2009) • Governmental Commission for High Tech & Innov. (2008) • New structures are a response to multidisciplinary and multisectoral nature of NN • To provide dialogue between different stakeholders, to develop the coordinated actions and to improve policy efficiency

  18. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 SISn Governance • Coordinating program – Program of Nanoindustry Development until 2015 (16 ministries) • FTP Development of Infrastructure of Nanoindustry • Program - Foundation of basic research in NN ( RAS) • Program – NN in Medicine (RAMN)

  19. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 SIS GovernanceProblems • Departmental barriers & interests • Corruption

  20. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Efficiency of NN Initiatives

  21. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Nanotech InvestmentsGlobal Trends • Phenomena of R&D expenditure trends in nano • Nanotech has attracted more funding than any S&T field • budget R&D expenditures on nanotech grows faster than budget appropriations on R&D • Although nano-market is at the initial stage as far as both basic and applied research are concentrated in public sector, corporate R&D expenditures grows faster than the public ones

  22. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Nanotech InvestmentHow RF looked before Presidential InitiativesBudjet Investment in NN in 2004 - 2005 • About 7% of global budget nanotech investment

  23. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Nanotech InvestmentsAfter Presidential Initiatives - Cientifica • About 20% of Global Budget Nanotech Investments (PPP)

  24. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Nanotech InvestmentsAfter Presidential Initiatives - Cientifica

  25. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Program of Nanotech Development until 2015 • Do not reflect all NN investments • Min. of Defense • Federal Space Agency • Corporation Rosatom (Nuclear Agency) • RAS • RAMS • Budget investments in Program of Nanotech Development in 2008 – 7,7% of GlobalBudget nanotech investments • 2008 (PPP) – 11% of Global Budget investments (2.8 times more than budget investments of Germany, 1,2 times more than Japan 2008-2015 • For infrastructure development – 11% ( 2008 – 52%) • For innovation projects – 56% (2008 – 2%, 2009 – 68%) • Human development - 3,2% (2008 - 0,07%) • R&D – 20% • RAMS investments growth (16 times for 2008-2010)

  26. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 R&D expendituresStatistics • Total R&D expenditures 2009 – $550.000 mil. • Total 2009/2008 – 8% (5%) • Federal budget 2009/2008 – 15% (12.4%) • Regional budget 2009/2008 – decrease 12% (14%) • Share regional budget in public funding – 2.6 • Federal budget 2009 • MES of the RF - 41.5% • RAS – 34.5 %

  27. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Sectoral R&D system Mapping organizations by experience and competences in NN research For majority organizations NN activity is in interval 75-25% of activity

  28. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Sectoral R&D SystemHuman Capacity • system grows out of the national innovation system and inherits its problems • Key problem – R&D staff decrease • EU Summit in Barcelona 2002- to increase numbers of researcher by 500 000 (376 000) • In 2000-2007 number of researchers increased 250 000

  29. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Sectoral R&D System Human Capacity • Average age of researchers – 47,8 years • Threat for fast developing S&T domains • Brain drain (Perm) • Outsourcing • global race for talents

  30. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Sectoral R&D System Human Capacity • On an average 47,5% organizations reported that the NN R&D staffs increased • Share of foreign researchers – 0.8% but in private sector – 7.7% (EU-6.0%) - finding

  31. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Sectoral R&D System Human Capacity Some young centers are emerging - finding Promising weak signal

  32. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Sectoral R&D System Human Capacity • Students number increase – promising trend

  33. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Mapping Knowledge Using Bibliographic Information • Overall, nanotechnology- related papers are increasing at rates that exceed those for all publications contained in the Thompson SCI database. • In 1991-2000 Russia published 1708 papers, was the 6

  34. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Mapping Knowledge Using Bibliographic InformationCites per paper for 25 cited countries Russia, China and South Korea complete the picture

  35. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Mapping Knowledge Using Bibliographic Information25 top ranked institutions during the 90-s

  36. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Mapping Knowledge Using Bibliographic Information • Russia is still the 6 • Share of Russia in world NN publications - 5%

  37. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Mapping Knowledge Using Bibliographic InformationNumber of Publications of most Productive Organizations

  38. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Mapping Knowledge Using Bibliographic InformationMost Productive Organizations In 2007, if compare to 2000, the number of papers increased 2.2 time, and the number of authors – 2.4 times. After year 2000, the average annual growth rate for paper publications in Russia was 11,8% (in China - 31.43%, in India 33.51%) Share of Russia in global NN publications – 3.8%

  39. Mapping Knowledge Using Bibliographic InformationWhere most citated papers were published? In 2008, Russian scholars published 1,4 more papers that in 2007, Russia's share was reduced to3,25 Russia took the 9th place in the top-ranked countries Russia passed forward UK and India Nanoscience funding in the 2000's has increased, compared to the 1990s, but the rank of Russia and its share in global NN publications has decreased

  40. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Mapping NN using patent information The annual rate of increase for all the patent publications is more pronounced between 2000 and 2008 (34.5%); it is higher than that of Science Citation Index’s article publication rate of 20–25% for the same period.

  41. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Mapping NN using patent information The Rank in the table is based on the total number of nanotechnology related patent applications and on this measure the RF is on the 6th place; It is comparable with the world rank of Russian Federation in publication. Number of patent applications to patent offices outside of RF is very small - do not plan to play globally Motivations for patenting Patent is not strong defense from coping Financial issues

  42. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Bottlenecks Key problems – low demand at the home market & lack of funding (only 4% marked it like slight problem) The second echelon problems – lack of personnel & lack of required facility (only 12% marked like slight problem)

  43. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Commercializationspin-offs • Effective research commercialisation requires: • a sufficient portfolio of research; • a healthy ecosystem; • The most common financial needs for universities in research commercialisation are: • pre-seed capital to fund prototype development • funds to support IP protection • In US • one spinoff company is generated from a research expenditure of about US$150 million • For best performers - at US$50 million In Australia • one spinoff company is generated from a research expenditure of about A$113 million for the research-intensive universities • for the medium and small research profile universities - A$303 In Russia one spinoff company is generated from research expenditures from about 45 mil. Rub.(about US$1.5 mil.) to 1 mil. Rub. (about US$33 thousands). – funding One can to conclude that Russian R&D organizations look more productive in terms of setting up spinoffs companies?

  44. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Commercializationspinoofs There is considerable variability in performance

  45. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Commercializationproblems Lack of funding Administrative barriers to enter market Lack of experience of researchers to commercialize R&D

  46. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 What could change trends in Commercialization Growing demand at the home market Public support of R&D commercialization Venture investment growth Cooperation with EU institutions

  47. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Nanomarket • More than 400 companies • Three subjects of federation are far ahead – Moscow (217 companies), Moscow region (52 companies) and St. Petersburg (53 companies). • Nanoscience distribution across the regions of the Russian Federation plays a special role in nanomarket development at the embryonic stage.

  48. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 NanomarketDistribution of nanocompanies by size, in % • About 80%- SMEs

  49. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 NanomarketMapping nanocompanies by nanoenabled product production strarting year

  50. Millennium Project Planning Committee Meeting, July, 2011 Nanomarket • Majority produce primary and intermediate product

More Related