340 likes | 470 Views
Accelerator neutrino experiments : new results and perspectives. Yury Kudenko Institute for Nuclear Research RAS. NPD RAS Session ITEP , 30 November 2007г. Neutrino oscillations К2К MINOS OPERA MiniBooNE Т2К NOVA. . m 23 2 , sin 2 2 23. . LSND.
E N D
Accelerator neutrino experiments: new results and perspectives Yury Kudenko Institute for Nuclear Research RAS NPD RAS Session ITEP, 30 November 2007г.
Neutrino oscillations К2К MINOS OPERA MiniBooNE Т2К NOVA m232, sin2223 LSND sterile e 13 CP(?) Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Mixing matrix 3 families solar atmospheric link between atmospheric and solar U parameterization: three mixing angles12 13 23 CP violating phase two independent m2 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Mixing and masses Oscillation parameters central value 2 interval m212 (10-5 eV2) 7.6 7.1 - 8.3 m231 (10-3eV2) 2.4 2.0 - 2.8 sin212 0.32 0.26 - 0.40 sin223 0.50 0.34 - 0.67 sin213 0.0 <0.05 Global data from: solar, atmospheric, reactor, LBL accelerator experiments 3 families Mixing Quarks Leptons 1-2 12 13o 33o 2-3 23 2.3o 45o 1-3 13 0.5o <10o CP = ? Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Mass spectrum sin213 2 3 } m2sol 1 m2atm or (Mass)2 m2atm 2 } m2sol 3 1 sin213 [|Ui|2] [|Ui|2] e [|Uei|2] Inverted Normal Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Long baseline accelerator experiments Main goals: search for e 13 precise measurement m223 23 mass hierarchy m213 > 0 or m213 < 0 CP CP 13 Ue3 = sin 13exp(-iCP) LBL experiments cannot distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos do not provide information about absolute mass Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Oscillation experiments: Appearance and Disappearance Yury Kudenko INR RAS
First LBL experiment К2К disappearance 1999-2005 (x) m2 210-3ev2 L/E 200 L=250 km <E> 1.3 GeV 98.2% e1.3% Predictions of flux and interactions at Far Detector by Far/Near ratio Signal of oscillation at K2K Reduction of events Distortion of energy spectrum ~1 event/2 days at SK Yury Kudenko INR RAS
K2K final result PRD74:072003,2006 + - # Events - Shape distortion Expected: 158.1 + 9.2 – 8.6 Observed: 112 Expected shape (no oscillation) Best fit Null oscillation probability #events 0.06% (3.4) shape 0.42% (2.9) Null oscillation probability (shape + # events) = 0.0015% (4.3) Kolmogorov-Smirnov test Best fit probability = 37% Best fit values sin22 = 1.00 m2 [eV2] = (2.80 0.36)10-3 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
MINOS 735 km Far Det: 5400 tons Near Det: 980 tons Precise study of “atmospheric” neutrino oscillations, using the NUMI beam and two detectors Beam:NuMI beam, 120 GeV Protons- beam Detectors:ND, FD Far Det:5.4 kton magnetized Fe/Sci Tracker/Calorimeter at Soudan, MN (L=735 km) Near Det:980 ton version of FD, at FNAL (L 1 km) Yury Kudenko INR RAS
First MINOS result PRL 97(2006)191801 1.27x1020 POT expect: 336 14.4 detect: 215 k2k Best fit values sin22 = 1.00 m2 [eV2 ] = (2.74 + 0.44 - 0.26) 10-3 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
New MINOS result J.Thomas, talk at Lepton-Photon2007 2.50 POT analyzed ≈ 2x statistics of 2006 result Improved analysis # expected (no osc.) 73830 # observed 563 Comparison of new and old MINOS results m223 =(2.38 +0.20 -0.16) x 10-3 sin2223=1.00 -0.08 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
m223 and 23: SK/K2K/MINOS |m223|| m213|= (2.4 0.2)x10-3 eV2 23 ~ 45o Yury Kudenko INR RAS
MINOS: projected sensitivity M.Ishitsuka, talk at NNN07 After 5 years running: expected accuracy of m232 and sin2223 10% chance for first indication of non-zero 13 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
1 mm t Pb Emulsion layers High energy, long baseline n beam ( E 17 GeV L ~ 730 km ) OPERA direct search P( ) = cos413sin223sin2[1.27m223L(km)/E(GeV)] kink Target mass ~1300t E/L ~ 2.310-2 10m223 (atm) pure beam: 2% anti <1% e after 5 years data taking: ~22000 interactions ~120 interactions ~12 reconstructed <1 background event Yury Kudenko INR RAS
e » ¸ ( 0 . 1 0 . 3 )% miss charge OPERA Detector Muon spectrometers p/p < 20% for p<50 GeV n beam Two supermodules • Hybrid Detector: • Two supermodules – Target Mass 1766 tons • 2 Magnetic spectrometers with RPC & Drift tubes • 2 x [31 Target Tracker planes and Target Walls] • 206,336 “ECC bricks” (56 Pb/Emulsion layers) • 12 M Emulsion plates (thin double-coated) Yury Kudenko INR RAS
OPERA: sensitivity M.Spinetti, talk at NNN07 full mixing, 5 years run 4.5 x1019pot/y New MINOS Yury Kudenko INR RAS
13: global T. Schwetz, hep/ph 0606060 13 100 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
LSND result m2 = 0.2 – 10 eV2 best fit: m2 = 0.2–10 eV2 sin22 = 0.003 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Oscillations before first MiniBooNe result Yury Kudenko INR RAS
MiniBooNE FNAL 8 GeV Beamline 50 m decay pipe 12m sphere filled withmineral oil and 1520 PMTslocated 500m from source decay region: , K “little muon counters:” measure K flux in-situ magnetic horn: meson focusing MiniBooNE detector Protons from the 8 GeV booster Neutrino Beam <E>~ 1 GeV →e? movable absorber: stops muons, undecayed mesons e ??? Yury Kudenko INR RAS
MiniBooNE result 6 x1020 POT PRL 98:231801,2007 [arXiv:0704.1500] No e excess in oscillation signal region E> 475 MeV however Yury Kudenko INR RAS
MiniBooNE result No evidence for e appearance oscillations • e (LSND anti-nu) • excess at low energy Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Possible interpretations if low-energy excess is confirmed to be a real signal • Non-oscillation + N + N + + N + Coupling between , Z and 2.610-41(E/GeV)6(g/10)4 cm2 С.С.Герштейн, Ю.Я.Комаченко, М.Ю.Хлопов, ЯФ 33 (1981) 1597 J.Harvey, C.Hill, R.Hill, arXiv:0708.1281[hep-ph] • Oscillation 3 +1 model ruled out M.Maltoni, T.Schwetz, arXiv:0051.0107[hep-ph] 3 + 2 or 3 + 3 models M.Maltoni, T.Schwetz, arXiv:0051.0107[hep-ph] A.Nelson, J.Walsh, arXiv:0711.1363[hep-ph] Extra dimensions H.Pas, S.Pakvasa, T.Weiler, hep-ph/0504096 (prediced low-energy excess) Lorentz violation T.Katori, A.Kostelecky, R.Tayloe, hep-ph/0606154 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Second generation LBL experiments Off Axis Neutrino Beams • Increases flux on oscillation maximum • Reduces high-energy tail and NC backgrounds • Reduces e contamination from K and decay T2K NOVA Yury Kudenko INR RAS
T2K(Tokai toKamioka) JPARC facility ~1GeV beam (100 of K2K) beam off-axis on-axis JPARC MINOS Opera K2K E(GeV) 50 120 400 12 Int(1012 ppp) 330 40 24 6 Rate (Hz) 0.29 0.53 0.17 0.45 Power (MW) 0.77 0.41 0.5 0.0052 Statistics at SK OAB 2.5 deg, 1 yr = 1021 POT, 22.5 kt ~ 2200 tot ~ 1600 charged current e < 0.5% at peak Yury Kudenko INR RAS
SuperK q Decay Pipe Target Horns T2K off-axis beam 0o OA2° OA2.5° OA3° 0 deg Yury Kudenko INR RAS
p p n off-axis on-axis 0m 140m 280m 2 km 295 km neutrino decay volume T2K setup Possible Future T2K-II ND280m ND2km monitor SK Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Principle Goals of T2K - Search for e appearance 13 sensitivity 1o (90% c.l.) Background uncertainty 10% CP = 0 CP = /2 CP = - /2 CP = m2=2.5x10-3 • Measurement m223 • with accuracy of 1% • (sin2223) 0.01 • (m223) < 110-4 eV2 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
T2K sensitivity to 13 CHOOZ limit ambiguities: CP - 13signm223 23 Yury Kudenko INR RAS
15.4m 70m 15.4m NOA 810 km baseline Far Detector • 15 ktons 15.4m x 15.4m x 70m • 1003 liquid scintillator planes (~80% active) • Scintillator cells 3.8 x 6.0 x 1540 cm3 • Read out from one side per plane with APDs Near detector Active element: Liquid scintillator U-shaped WLS fiber Yury Kudenko INR RAS
NOA P( e) depends on sin2213 sign m223 CP matter effects increase (decrease) oscillations for normal (inverted) hierarchy for Mass hierarchy can be resolved if 13 near to present limit using both anti- beams and sin2213 from T2K + reactor experiments Yury Kudenko INR RAS
13sensitivities vs time A.Blondel et al., hep-ph/0606111 Daya Bay goal Short baseline reactor experiments Double-Chooz and Daya Bay 13 ( insensitive to CP) Yury Kudenko INR RAS
Conclusion K2K confirmation of atmospheric neutrino oscillations discovered by SK MINOSconfirmed the SK и K2K results high precision measurements of oscillation parameters MiniBooNerules out (98% cl) the LSND result as e oscilations withm2 ~ 1 eV2 new anomaly appears run with anti- beam OPERA data takingbegun in 2007 T2K-I neutrino beam in 2009 Main goal for next 5 years:13 Yury Kudenko INR RAS