1 / 18

David Dawson Head of Digital Futures

MINERVA and MICHAEL: Where do we go to?. David Dawson Head of Digital Futures. Where are we now?. MINERVA. National Representatives Group link to national policy formation developing an Action Plan for Culture Ministers of Europe for launch under UK Presidency Technical Guidelines

strauch
Download Presentation

David Dawson Head of Digital Futures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MINERVA and MICHAEL: Where do we go to? David Dawson Head of Digital Futures

  2. Where are we now?

  3. MINERVA • National Representatives Group • link to national policy formation • developing an Action Plan for Culture Ministers of Europe for launch under UK Presidency • Technical Guidelines • 10 Quality Principles

  4. MICHAEL • Multi-lingual Inventory for Cultural Heritage in Europe • initially 3 countries • national inventories harvested into a European portal • open source software, open standards, open project

  5. EU Context • Lisbon Agenda • most dynamic economy • Diversity • need to actively promote linguistic diversity • iEurope 2010 • successor to eEurope Action Plan in early stages of development • role of Culture Ministers Action Plan

  6. EU Programmes • eContentPlus • coming soon … • facilitating access & re-use of existing content • enable creation of added-value services • Geographic Information, Education, Cultural & Scientific content • thematic networks • targetted programmes • best practice • public sector information, public domain issues

  7. Current issues • user-generated content • blogging • personal digital archives (Internet Archive / www.ourmedia.org) • pod-casting • user-rating (Amazon / A9 etc) • open content / public domain • role of Creative Commons • digital inclusion • cultural content as a driver for technology adoption

  8. Reasons for not using the internet Q28/29 Could I ask you to think about why you don’t use the internet/world wide web? Just not interested in using it Don’t know enough about it Computers too expensive /can’t afford to buy one Don’t understand the jargon/terminology etc. Too old to learn new things Nothing on it that would appeal to me Don’t have enough time Feel nervous/not confident about the technology Have concerns about security /confidentiality Base: All non-users (724); combined unprompted and prompted reasons given by 10+% of respondents

  9. What are non-users interested in? Q36/37 Which particular types of information, if any, would you be interested in finding out on the internet/ world wide web? Information about my local area 32% Info abouteducation and learning 27% Health-related info 26% Family tree 24% Historical info 30% Geographical info 24% Nature-related info 22%

  10. Website content Q27 Please can you tell me how important, if at all, each of the following is in affecting how you feel about a website? Important Not important How reliable/trustworthy the content appears to be Quality of content How up to date the content appears How well the home page explainswhat the rest of the site contains The range of content on the site Provision of search facilities Reputation of the organisation Availability of material you can download Links to other sites Base: All ever used (1,393)

  11. Why does quality matter? “A pupil searching for information about the Reformation may select information found on a website with a .org or .gov suffix because it is likely to be more reliable” KS3 National Strategy: ICT across the curriculum: History Department for Education and Skills, 2004 • what about • .ac.uk .museum .edu .it .de .pl ??? • people trust museums, libraries and archives • how do we show people they can trust our sites?

  12. Trust Q41 To what extent, if at all, would you tend to trust the information provided by the following types of organisation? A great deal / fair amount Not very much / at all A museum / library / archive BBC An organisation you have heard of A public service (e.g. NHS) A government department Your local council A utility company A travel agency An internet only retail company Base: All (1,674)

  13. What does this mean for us? • how do we show we are to be trusted? • how do users find what they are interested in? • themes • geographical location • how do we support users at institutional, local, regional, national and European levels?

  14. A diagram … presentation services shared services middleware content

  15. What next? • role of a Quality Mark for Cultural Web Sites • demonstrate commitment to Quality Principles • identify that is part of the European Cultural Information Environment

  16. How? • Quattro project • working with ICRA and other providers of trust marks • developing technical methods for disclosing trust/quality marks of various kinds (using RDF) • engaging with mobile phone companies and the search engines in order to test the possibility of such marks being used to prioritise content in search rankings

  17. So … • turn the Quality Principles into a Quality mark • self-assessment mechanism • link to MICHAEL? • is it pass / fail, bronze / silver / gold, 75% • trademark the mark • get larger well-known institutions using it to promote adoption • use DRM systems to track deployment – reverse-linking • role for user-rating? role of user-testing?

  18. EU Cultural Network  80% User rating:

More Related