1 / 17

Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSB

Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSB Brian F. Cooper, Adam Silberstein, Erwin Tam, Raghu Ramakrishnan , Russell Sears Yahoo! Research Presenter Duncan. Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSB. Benchmarking vs Testing Any difference? My opinion Benchmarking: Performance

stu
Download Presentation

Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSBBrian F. Cooper, Adam Silberstein, Erwin Tam, RaghuRamakrishnan, Russell SearsYahoo! ResearchPresenter Duncan

  2. Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSB • Benchmarking vs Testing • Any difference? • My opinion • Benchmarking: Performance • Testing: usability test, security test, performance etc…

  3. Motivation • A lot of new systems in Cloud for data storage and management • MongoDB, MySQL, Asterix, etc.. • Tradeoff • E.g. Append update to a sequential disk-log • Good for write, bad for read • Synchronous replication • copies up to date, but high write latency • How to choose? • Use benchmark to model your scenario!

  4. Evaluate Performance =? • Latency • Users don’t want to wait! • Throughput • Want to serve more requests! • Inherent tradeoff between latency and throughput • More requests => more resource contention=> higher latency

  5. Which system is better? • “Typically application designers must decide on an acceptable latency, and provision enough servers to achieve the desired throughput” • achieve the desired latency and throughput with fewer servers. • Desired latency:0.1 sec, 100 request/sec • MongoDB, 10 server • Asterix DB, 15 server

  6. What else to evaluate? • Cloud platform • Scalability • Good scalability=>performance proportional to # of servers • Elasticity • Good elasticity=>performance improvement with small disruption

  7. A Short Summary • Evaluate performance = evaluate latency, throughput, scalability, elasticity • A better system= less machine to achieve the performance goal

  8. YCSB • Data generator • Workload generator • YCSB client • Interface to communicate with DB

  9. YCSB Data Generator • A table with F fields and N records • Each field => a random string • E.g. 1,000 byte records, F=10, 100 bytes per field

  10. Workload Generator • Basic operations • Insert, update, read, scan • No join, aggregate etc. • Able to control the distributions of: • Which operation to perform • E.g. 0.95 read, 0.05 update, 0 scan => read-heavy workload • Which record to read or write • Uniform • Zipfian: some records are extremely popular • Latest: recent records are more popular

  11. YCSB Client • A script • Use the script to run the benchmark • Workload parameter files • You can change the parameter • Java program • DB interface layer • You can implement the interface for your DB system

  12. Experiments • Experiment Setup: • 6 servers • YCSB client on another server • Cassandra, HBase, MySQL, PNUTS • Update heavy, read heavy, read only, read latest, short range scan workload.

  13. Future Work • Availability • Impact of failure on the system performance • Replication • Impact to performance when increase replication

  14. 4 criteria • Author’s 4 criteria for a good benchmark: • Relevance to application • Portability • Not just for 1 system! • Scalability • Not just for small system, small data! • simplicity

  15. Reference • Benchmarking Cloud Serving Systems with YCSB, Brian F. Cooper, Adam Silberstein, Erwin Tam, RaghuRamakrishnan, Russell Sears, SOCC 10 • BG: A Benchmark to Evaluate Interactive Social Networking Actions, SumitaBarahmand, ShahramGhandeharizadeh, CIDR 13 • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_testing • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benchmark_(computing)

  16. Thank You! • Questions?

  17. Why a new benchmark? • Most cloud systems do not have a SQL interface => hard to implement complex queries • Benchmark only for specific applications • TPC-W for E-commerce • TPC-C for apps that mange, sell, distribute product/service

More Related