1 / 8

And all shall have prizes?: Assessing Group Learning

And all shall have prizes?: Assessing Group Learning. Patrick Barlow, CATL April 15, 2011. At last the Dodo said, ‘ everybody  has won, and all must have prizes.’.

sugar
Download Presentation

And all shall have prizes?: Assessing Group Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. And all shall have prizes?: Assessing Group Learning Patrick Barlow, CATL April 15, 2011

  2. At last the Dodo said, ‘everybody has won, and all must have prizes.’ Retrieved 4 11/2011 from http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/c/carroll/lewis/alice/index.html holder of a Creative Commons License. eBooks@Adelaide, The University of Adelaide Library, University of Adelaide, South Australia 5005

  3. Plan for today: • 2008 NSSE results on group work • Identification of some potential assessment challenges • Review of your current use of and satisfaction with group learning techniques • Review of some strategies/tools that may aid in assessment of group learning Assessing Group Learning

  4. 2008 NSSE Responses • First year students report lower frequency of IN-CLASS group projects than our system, Carnegie, and National comparison groups. Seniors are not meaningfully different. • First year and Senior students report higher frequency of OUT of CLASS group projects than all 3 comparison groups. • Seniors report a positive impact of UWL experience on ability to “work effectively with others” at levels above all 3 comparison groups.

  5. Identification of students’ pre-course level of the abilities/skills/knowledge you hope to impact in your course. • Identification of your focus of the assessment on the knowledge, skills, attitudes you hope to build through via your group work • Collection of information on group process and product (focus on both?, who provides the data?) • Use of assessment to help improve group techniques (formative) vs. assessment of end result of impact of technique (summative) • Getting the overall picture of impact from a series of groups vs focus on the exemplary/dysfunctional extremes Some Assessment Challenges

  6. How and why do you use group learning in your classes? • How do you currently assess group learning? • In what ways are you satisfied or dissatisfied with your current assessment strategies?   Current Use and Issues

  7. Group Learning Strategy: Small Group Discussion • Tool: Discussion Evaluation Form (Cerbin, 2010) completed by students • Delivery: Prior to use of discussion and few choice points in course • Group Learning Strategy: Ongoing Team Project • Tool: Teamwork Rubric (Jiles, Huba, et al, 2000) for students and/or instructor • Delivery: Before group begins work and ongoing monitoring • Group Learning Strategy: Peer Review of Writing • Peer Review Record (Phillips & Ahrenhoerster, 2009) • Delivery: Each peer review cycle Some Tools

  8. Indentify problems in group work and solutions: http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/solveproblem/step1-problem/index.html • (Check area for Group Skills and Dynamics) • Design of Group Learning Strategies: Collaborative Learning Techniques, Barkley, Cross, & Major (2005) available from CATL • Grading Issues: http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/assesslearning/groupWork.html Some Other Resources

More Related