1 / 21

INTERREG IVC Introduction to programme & application process

INTERREG IVC Introduction to programme & application process. Teresa Marcinów, Info Point East Lead Applicant Seminar, 10 December 2007, Katowice. Overview. Programme Structure Development Application Assessment Decision. 1. Programme Structure. INTERREG IIIC versus INTERREG IVC.

tait
Download Presentation

INTERREG IVC Introduction to programme & application process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INTERREG IVC Introduction to programme & application process Teresa Marcinów, Info Point East Lead Applicant Seminar, 10 December 2007, Katowice

  2. Overview • Programme Structure • Development • Application • Assessment • Decision

  3. 1. Programme Structure INTERREG IIIC versus INTERREG IVC INTERREG IVC INTERREG IIIC • 315 MEUR ERDF • Cofinancing up to 50% (up to 75% for Objective 1 Regions) • Four programmes: 4 Managing, 4 Audit and 4 Paying Authorities • 4 JTS • All themes of regional and local public activities • 3 Types of Operations • 321 MEUR ERDF • Cofinancing up to 75%/85% • One programme: 1 Managing Authority (Région Nord-Pas de Calais), 1 Audit Authority, 1 Certifying Authority • 1 JTS in Lilleand 4 Information Points in Rostock, Katowice (with support from Vienna), Valencia and Lille • Focus on Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas • 2 Types of Interventions

  4. 1. Programme structure INTERREG IVC – Management structures

  5. 1. Programme structure • Information points • Rostock (IBSH), Germany:Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden, Norway; • Katowice (MRD), Poland, with support from the City of Vienna: Austria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Romania; • Valencia (GV), Spain: Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Spain • Lille (RNPC), France: Belgium, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Switzerland

  6. 2. Development • Tools provided by the JTS and the Information Points (IPs) • Website www.interreg4c.net • Events • Consultations • Application Pack • Project idea database • Brochures, leaflets and articles in relevant media

  7. 3. Application • Application Pack • Programme Manual • Application Form • Activities Timeplan • Co-financing Statement

  8. 3. Application • Programme Manual • Programme information • Project development • Application & selection • Project implementation • Project closure

  9. 3. Application • Application Form • General instruction • Checklist • Project summary • Detailed project description • Components • Budget • Partnership

  10. 3. Application Activities Timeplan

  11. 3. Application Co-financing Statement

  12. 3. Application • Time table: • 21 September 2007: Opening of first call • 15 January 2008: Deadline for submission of • applications first call • June 2008 (provisional) Opening of second call • October 2008 (provisional) Deadline for submission of • applications second call

  13. 4. Assessment • Assessment of applications • Eligibility Check • Quality Check

  14. 4. Assessment • Eligibility Check (by JTS) • Application Form submitted in due time • Application is complete • Application is fully and properly filled • All Co-financing Statements are correctly filled and printed • Partnership from a min of three countries, from which at least two partners must be from EU Member States and financed by the INTERREG IVC programme • Mini-programmes: max of eight partners

  15. 4. Assessment • Quality Check (by JTS and external experts) 1) Relevance of the proposal • Content related 2) Coherence of the proposal 3) Quality of results 4) Quality of management • Implementation related 5) Quality of partnership 6) Budget and finance

  16. 4. Assessment • Scoring system • Not eligible (Information to MC and Lead Applicant) • Eligible • Eligibility Check • 0 Knock out (objective of the project can not be fulfilled) • Very poor • Poor • Adequate • Good • Excellent • Quality Check

  17. 4. Assessment • Time table (provisional): • By end Feb 2008: Eligibility Check • By end May 2008: Quality Check

  18. 5. Decision • MC decision • based on recommendation of JTS

  19. 5. Decision • MC decision • Two-thirds majority of Member States present needed • Majority must include votes of countries having a Partner on its territory.

  20. 5. Decision • MC decision • Approval without condition • Approval with conditions • Rejection

  21. 5. Decision • Time table (provisional): • By end June 2008 Decision MC

More Related