1 / 7

Public Service Board Finance Group Report 10 th March 2010

Public Service Board Finance Group Report 10 th March 2010. 2 Issues considered Impact of budget decisions on partners Methodology for sharing single service savings. All 7 organisations represented Frank open discussion Differences in planning approaches

tale
Download Presentation

Public Service Board Finance Group Report 10 th March 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Public Service Board Finance Group Report 10th March 2010

  2. 2 Issues considered • Impact of budget decisions on partners • Methodology for sharing single service savings

  3. All 7 organisations represented • Frank open discussion • Differences in planning approaches • (e.g. 1 year to 4 year plans)

  4. Issues • Significant savings for all parties • UHL has the greatest challenge in 2010/11 • Major impacts inevitably involve health/social care interface • Voluntary sector – Moves to target funding more in line with objectives/strategies

  5. Risks/Opportunities • Ideally needs whole system approach to service • users/patient pathway • Great potential in terms of asset/capital investment • rationalisation • Joining up transformational programmes/single • service initiatives • Single services for longer term savings • More joined up commissioning e.g. inflationary • increases for external suppliers

  6. Single Service Savings – • General Presumption • Proposed method based on marginal costs/savings • Net savings allocated pro rata to usage • Will need to adapt to different circumstances

  7. Next Steps • Liaison on future plans • Alignment of care pathway • Joined up approach on voluntary sector

More Related