70 likes | 163 Views
Public Service Board Finance Group Report 10 th March 2010. 2 Issues considered Impact of budget decisions on partners Methodology for sharing single service savings. All 7 organisations represented Frank open discussion Differences in planning approaches
E N D
Public Service Board Finance Group Report 10th March 2010
2 Issues considered • Impact of budget decisions on partners • Methodology for sharing single service savings
All 7 organisations represented • Frank open discussion • Differences in planning approaches • (e.g. 1 year to 4 year plans)
Issues • Significant savings for all parties • UHL has the greatest challenge in 2010/11 • Major impacts inevitably involve health/social care interface • Voluntary sector – Moves to target funding more in line with objectives/strategies
Risks/Opportunities • Ideally needs whole system approach to service • users/patient pathway • Great potential in terms of asset/capital investment • rationalisation • Joining up transformational programmes/single • service initiatives • Single services for longer term savings • More joined up commissioning e.g. inflationary • increases for external suppliers
Single Service Savings – • General Presumption • Proposed method based on marginal costs/savings • Net savings allocated pro rata to usage • Will need to adapt to different circumstances
Next Steps • Liaison on future plans • Alignment of care pathway • Joined up approach on voluntary sector