80 likes | 205 Views
Safeguards and Co-benefits in a REDD+ Mechanism Garanties et co-bénéfices liés au mécanisme REDD+. With support from the Norwegian Development Agency. REDD+ Safeguards in the Cancun Agreements.
E N D
Safeguards and Co-benefits in a REDD+ Mechanism Garanties et co-bénéfices liés au mécanisme REDD+ With support from the Norwegian Development Agency
REDD+ Safeguards in the Cancun Agreements • REDD+ programs to include a system for providing information on how safeguards are being addressed and respected, while respecting national sovereignty • Annex I sets out the safeguards to be promoted and supported • Annex II calls on SBSTA to develop guidance for the information system for reporting on safeguards, for consideration at COP 17
Safeguards for REDD+ REDD+ Safeguards included in the Cancun Agreements: • To ensure that REDD+ actions do not cause negative social or economic impacts • conversion of natural forests to plantations, loss of biodiversity, displacement and relocation of forest-dependent communities, elite capture of benefits, leakage, lack of permanence • If safeguards designed properly, can promote co-benefits • biodiversity conservation, poverty alleviation, improved community livelihoods, technology transfer Safeguards can be viewed as the “do no harm” principle, and co-benefits are additional benefits beyond the status quo.
Safeguards Standards • UN-REDD Programme's Social and Environment Principles and Criteria • World Bank Safeguards and Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) • REDD+ Social and Environmental Standards (REDD+ SES) • Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) Principles and Criteria
System for Sharing Information • What is the purpose of the safeguards information system? • How will the system respect national sovereignty? • What safeguards information should be shared? • How often should countries report on safeguards? • Are international minimum standards needed? • What review and/or verification of safeguards is needed? • How does the safeguards information system fit in the broader REDD+ institutional framework?
Important Considerations • Building synergies • CBD, information gathered in SESAs, systems to MRV changes in carbon stocks • Cost effectiveness • Little information available about costs, but concerns that could make REDD+ more complex and more expensive • Estimates of costs to set up system and undertake initial monitoring range from US$35,000 in Costa Rica to $600,000 in DRC in R-PPs submitted to FCPF
Outstanding Issues in the lead-up to COP 17 • Design of system for providing information on how safeguards are being addressed and respected, while respecting national sovereignty • Determining how this system will link to the MRV of REDD+ emissions and sinks • How to encourage that REDD+ national activities go beyond “do no harm” to encourage co-benefits
Safeguards: Example Questions • What lessons can be learned from activities in your country that can inform the negotiations? • How can we encourage REDD+ activities that go beyond do no harm and encourage multiple benefits? • What safeguard information systems are needed for REDD+?