1 / 39

Image credit: NASA

Alternative Detections of Gamma Ray Bursts. René Hudec 2 and Rudolf Slosiar 1 1 Slovak Union of Amateur Astronomers, Bojnice, Slovak Republic 2 Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-251 65 Ondrejov, Czech Republic. Image credit: NASA.

tammy
Download Presentation

Image credit: NASA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Alternative Detections of Gamma Ray Bursts René Hudec2 and Rudolf Slosiar1 1 Slovak Union of Amateur Astronomers, Bojnice, Slovak Republic 2 Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-251 65 Ondrejov, Czech Republic Image credit: NASA

  2. Alternative GRB Detections By Ionospheric Response By Bright Prompt Optical Emission By Promt X-ray Emission

  3. Indirect detection of GRBs by ionospheric response

  4. Introduction • We report on the independent and indirect detection of GRBs by their ionospheric response (SID – Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance) observed at VLF (Very Low Frequency). • Although few such detections have been already reported in the past, the capability of such alternative and indirect investigations of GRBs still remains to be investigated in more details. We present and discuss the examples of further such VLF/SID detections.

  5. Previous VLF detections of GRBs • SGR1806: Detection of a Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance. Campbell et al., GCN 2932, 2003. • GRB030329 observed as a Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance (SID) P.W. Schnoor GCN 2176, 2003.

  6. Physics behind ionospheric detection I • The solar particle stream, solar wind, shapes and controls the Earths‚magnetic envelope - the magnetosphere- and increases heat in the aurorazones. But not all ionospheric variability is caused by solar orgeomagnetic disturbances. The ionosphere is not a constant 'mirror in thesky'. The E layer (100-200 km above ground) and the F1 layer (170-200 km)usually behave in regular, solar-controlled way, but the F2 layer (250-350km) does not. • It is the F2 layer, which has the greatest density offree electrons, and is potentially the most effective reflector of radiowaves. (Rishbeth, Nature Vol. 418, 4 July 2002)

  7. Physics behind ionospheric detection II • The ionossperic D layer plays in the GRB detections an important role, as the detection of X-ray and gamma-ray triggers is based on the measuremeńt (monitoring) of reflected radio waves from this layer. The ionospheric D layer is not transparent for radio VLF waves (frequencies 3kHz to 30 kHz) and behaves like a mirror. • If the transmitter is at large distance (800 to 2000 km) then the radio waves are guided like in a waveguide consisting of the D layer and the earth surface. • Any change in the quality of this waveguide results then in the signal change in the SID monitor. The change can be positive but in some cases such as the sudden phase anomaly also negative.

  8. Typical ionospheric behaviour This picture shows the typical behaviour of the ionosphere during one day. Note the different behavior at night with absence of the D layer.

  9. The plot from the SID monitor during the period of enhanced solar activity Demonstration of the possibility and sensitivity of the method. Four Solar Flares (SF) are visible with intensities M6, C6, C2, C4, exactly corresponding to the measurements by the GOES satellite. The peak related to the SF C4 occurs around 15:03UT, which is nearly the detection time of GRB060124A, on Jan 24, 2006, confirming that even at the time of the decay of the D ionospheric layer reliable measurements are feasible. Dec 6, 2006

  10. SGR1806-20: A sharp spike, then re-normalization of the ionosphere (Howe, 2004)

  11. The SID receiver and cross loop antenna 2-channel receiver used to eliminate false triggers Instrumentation used for the indirect detection ofGRB 060124A. The antenna size is 75 x 75 cm Inexpensive instrumentation suitable for easy duplication for other sites

  12. The detection of GRB 060124A GRB_TIME: 15:54:51.82 UT SID trigger detection 15:56:31 +/- 5sec Swift BAT LCT

  13. The detection of GRB 060124A

  14. For comparison: SID from C2-class solar flare erupted from sunspot 958

  15. GRB080319D – possible detection GRB_TIME: 17:05:09.34 UT SID signal: 17:05:41 +/- 5sec Swift BAT LCT

  16. GRB080320A – possible detection Swift BAT LCT GRB_TIME: 04:37:38.46UT SID signal: 04:38:59 +/- 5sec. Emitter Tavolara (Sardinia) Emitter Sainte Asise (France)

  17. Speculations • In the both recent cases of possible detection of GRB080319D and GRB080320A, some structure appeared afterwards, resembling a propagation ionospheric wave • Further observations are necessary to confirm this hypothesis

  18. GRB Induced Propagating Ionospheric Waves Speed: 300 to 1200m/s

  19. Possible GRB080319D Induced Propagating Ionospheric Waves

  20. For illustration: Recent EarthquakeMay 29, 2008, at 15:46 UT(during yesterday talk of Claudio) Ionospheric waves can be triggered both from outside (space radiation) but also from inside (e.g. earthquakes) Distance Bojnice-Island (epicentre) 2680km SID disturbance detected with delay of 74 min Hence mean speed of propagation of the ionospheric wave was 603 m/s (In Vulcano, the wave arrived during talk of Anatoly)

  21. Discussion The conditions to detect GRB with SID monitor in VLF • The presence of the D layer of the ionosphere • The suitable combination of the GRB position (RA, DEC) and time and hence direction and angle of the incoming gamma-ray radiation in relation to the D layer and observing site. • The fluence and duration of the GRB. The detection statistics • The recent detection rate of GRBs is about 130 in a year. • For one observing station, the number of GRBs occuring during the presence of a D layer and in the field of view is about 20 • This is ideal number, the real one is less than 10 due to occassional non-availability of transmitters and other technical and observational issues.

  22. Discussion II • If the ionospheric detection of GRBs will be definitely confirmed, a dedicated experiment could be considered, namely a dedicated emitter

  23. GRB Detection by Bright OT Emission • A small fraction of GRBs is accompanied by bright optical prompt emission (OT) • This emission can be as bright as mag 6, and perhaps even brighter • Such triggers can be detected in optical light, independently on gamma-ray detection

  24. GRB080319B For ~ 1 minute Brighter in optical light than mag 6 Naked eye visibility at z ~ 0.75 Indication exists that some OT may be as bright as mag 4 at early times

  25. Prompt optical emission of GRB060117 Peak 11.5 mag 2 min after GRB, decline 1.4 mag in 2 min Images by WF lens 70 mm aperture at the Czech FRAM RT in Argentina (related to Auger).

  26. Methods to detect bright OTs of GRBs • Wide-field monitoring systems, CCD (preferably All-Sky) • Wide-field monitoring systems, photographic (secondary use of meteor patrol) • Archival Astronomical Plates • Always sophisticated s/w needed to find and to verify the triggers • Problem: (1) large background (2) typically, we have to look for 1 new object among 10 000 - 100 000 stars: job for informatics students

  27. CONCAM All Sky Optical Monitoring Lim mag 4….5 i.e. not enough for most scientific goals Price 10x more than the alternative system shown before Vulcano Workshop 2008

  28. Peleng 8 mm fish-eye lens (1:3,5-1:16) that provides a 24 mm circular 180° field of view, and a CANON EOS 350D digital CCD camera Digital CCD all-sky monitoring lim mag ~11 Karlovy Vary Observatory, CZ Vulcano Workshop 2008

  29. All Sky CCD Camera, Sonneberg Observatory, 7K x 4K CCD and f/3.5 FE lens. Lim mag 10 in 1 min integration time. Sterrewacht Leiden Lunch Talk

  30. CCD Sky Patrol Test Images Sonneberg lim mag 14 - 15 Vulcano Workshop 2008

  31. How the OTs of GRBs should look like? Exampleoffast OT found - durationlessthan 5 minutes … and that’s expected Results promising- only 1 OT per plate found (typically) Vulcano Workshop 2008

  32. OpticalTransientAnalyses - OT in Triangulum, SonnebergAstrograph Plate, 6 magabove plate limitreal object of unknown The searches for analogous OTs are difficult since the plates contains typically 100 000 – 1 000 000 star images Another short OT example, mag < 10 OT Comparison plate: no OT Vulcano Workshop 2008

  33. Problem: backround triggers simulating OTs The OTs of (unknown) astrophysical origin have been confirmed also by CCD observations (Brno 60 cm CCD telescope, Filip Hroch) Stars elongated, OT image not elongated – short OT 38. Variable Stars Conference ValMez 2006

  34. GRB Detections By Prompt X-ray emission • So far most GRB are detected by their gamma-ray emission • Most of the GRBs exhibit also X-ray emission • Hence the GRBs can be detected also in X-rays (as independent detections) • This goal requires sensitive all-sky monitoring • Obvious solution is offered by X-ray All-Sky Monitors with Lobster Eye Optics

  35. LE lens arrangement according to Angel X-ray All Sky Monitor with LE modules The front wiewofthe mini - lobster module, Schmidt arrangement, based on 100 micronthickplatesspaced by 300 microns, 23 x 23 mm each The X-ray measurement at 8 keV in comparison with mathematical simulation model measured

  36. Conclusions • The independent and indirect detection of GRBs by their ionospheric response (SID – Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance) observed at VLF (Very Low Frequency) is feasible. • We present and discuss examples of such VLF/SID detections of three GRB. • The capability of such alternative and indirect investigations of GRBs, as well as the possible contribution to analyses of GRBs still remains to be investigated in more details. • The GRBs can be also (independently) detected in optical light and in X-rays, based on suitable optical and X-ray all-sky monitors

  37. The End

  38. GRB080319D – possible detection

  39. GRB080319D – possible detection

More Related