1 / 31

Selecting news to suit a group of criteria: an exploration

Selecting news to suit a group of criteria: an exploration. Judith Masthoff University of Brighton. Average Strategy. Use average of the individual ratings. Group list: (E, F) H (D, J) A I B G C. Least Misery Strategy. Use minimum of the individual ratings.

taryn
Download Presentation

Selecting news to suit a group of criteria: an exploration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Selecting news to suit a group of criteria: an exploration Judith Masthoff University of Brighton

  2. Average Strategy Use average of the individual ratings Group list: (E, F) H (D, J) A I B G C

  3. Least Misery Strategy Use minimum of the individual ratings Group list: F E (H, J, D) G B I C A

  4. Average Without Misery Strategy Use average of the individual ratings, excluding items below threshold (say 4) Group list: (E, F) H (D, J) B G

  5. Experiment: How people do it • 36 subjects • Given ratings of news items on three criteria • Which to watch if only time for 1 item, 2 items, …, 7 items

  6. Criteria used • Importance of the news in general • Relevance of the location to you • Recency of the news

  7. Criteria used • Importance of the news in general • Relevance of the location to you • Recency of the news

  8. Results - Part 1

  9. Results - Part 1 Red = Average Strategy

  10. Results - Part 1 Red = Average Strategy Shaded =Least Misery Strategy

  11. Results - Part 2

  12. Results - Part 2 Red = Average Strategy

  13. Results - Part 2 Red = Average Strategy Red dotted = Average Without Misery Strategy

  14. Results - Part 3

  15. Introduction of A and I A (10, 1, 10) I (10, 3, 7) Grey = This experiment Black = Old experiment

  16. Dealing with inequality

  17. Average Strategy Use average of the individual ratings Group list: (E, F) H (D, J) A I B G C

  18. Average over Important Criteria Use average of the individual ratings Group list: A E (F, I) (H, J) D G B C

  19. Least Misery Strategy Use minimum of the individual ratings Group list: F E (H, J, D) G B I C A

  20. Least Misery For Important Criteria Use minimum of the individual ratings Group list: A F E I (H, J, D) G B C

  21. Average Strategy Use average of the individual ratings Group list: (E, F) H (D, J) A I B G C

  22. Average Strategy with Weights Use average of the individual ratings Group list: E A F I H J D G B C (3-1-3) E F A (H,I) J D G B C (2-1-2)

  23. Average Without Misery Strategy Use average of the individual ratings, excluding items below threshold (say 6) Group list: (E, F) H (D, J)

  24. Average Without Misery for Some Use average of the individual ratings, excluding items below threshold (say 6) Group list: (E, F) H (D, J) A I (threshold 6) (E, F) A I (threshold 7)

  25. Results - Part 1 Red = Average Strategy Shaded =Least Misery Strategy

  26. Results - Part 1 Red = Average Strategy Shaded =Least Misery Strategy Blue dotted = Average Without Miseryfor Some

  27. Results - Part 2 Red = Average Strategy Dotted = Average Without Misery

  28. Results - Part 2 Red = Average Strategy Blue = Average With Weights Dotted = Average Without Misery (blue: for Some)

  29. Results - Part 3

  30. Results - Part 3 Yellow shading = Least Misery for Important Criteria

  31. Conclusions • Similarity between multiple criteria and multiple people • Main issue is inequality in importance • Adapted strategies help to explain a bit • But more work needed

More Related