1 / 35

Super B Factory Physics Impact

Super B Factory Physics Impact. David Hitlin SLAC SSI August 5, 2009. Why Super B factories ?.

tatiana
Download Presentation

Super B Factory Physics Impact

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Super B FactoryPhysics Impact David Hitlin SLAC SSI August 5, 2009

  2. Why Super B factories ? • The motivation to continue e+e- flavor physics studies with a Super B factory beyond the BABAR/Belle/(LHCb) era lies in its ability to make measurements that have sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model • This sensitivity extends to New Physics in b, c and t decay • A data sample of 50-75 ab-1is required to provide this sensitivity • BABAR +Belle total sample is <2 ab-1 • A luminosity in the range of 1036 cm-2s-1 is required to integrate this large a sample in a reasonable time • There are two approaches on the market to acquiring such a sample • SuperKEKB at KEK and SuperB at Rome II Univ (Tor Vergata) or LNF • Both asymmetric colliders now use a version of the “Italian scheme” • Collide asymmetric energy rings having very low emittance, similar to those developed for the ILC damping rings and high brightness light sources • SuperB also employs a new type of final focus – a “crabbed waist” and has a longitudinally polarized LER beam • Beam currents and wallplug power are reduced from brute force extrapolations of the existing machines PEP-II and KEKB • Luminosity-related backgrounds and radiation levels in the forward/backward directions are high: require intensive study • Designing an appropriate detector is a tractable problem

  3. Two nascent efforts • Both now employ versions of the “Italian scheme”: • Low emittance rings with large crossing angles >80ab-1 after6years 50ab-1 by ~2020 L~8x1035 10ab-1 ~ 2016 L~2x1035 3year shutdown for upgrade 2015? 2020?

  4. also charm and t physics

  5. What’s the killer “Shake the Box” app? • Is it the ability to discover lepton flavor-violating t decays and determine the chirality of the LFV coupling ? • Neutrino oscillations demonstrate the existence of neutral LFV couplings • Charged LFV are very small in the Standard Model, but measureable at a Super B factory • Is it the unique sensitivity to new CP phases beyond the CKM phase in B and Ddecay through studies of direct and indirect CP asymmetries? • Is it the sensitivity to the existence of a fourth quark generation ? • Is it the sensitivity to right-handed currents ? • Is it the sensitive tests of CPT invariance at the highest available q2 made possible by exploiting quantum coherence? • Is it the whole panoply of measurements and the pattern of effects uncovered that can serve as a “DNA chip” for New Physics found at LHC ?

  6. Many SM extensions yield measurable effects in flavor physics Little Higgs w/MFV UV fix Generic Little Higgs Extra dim w/SM on brane Generic extra dim w SM in bulk SUSY GUTs SupersoftSUSY breakingDirac gauginos MSSMMFVlarge tan MSSMMFVlow tan Effective SUSY SM-like flavor physics Observable effects of New Physics after G. Hiller

  7. Lepton Flavor Violation in t decays Super B Factory sensitivity directly confronts New Physics models BABAR SuperBsensitivity For 75 ab-1 We expect to see LFV events, not just improve limits

  8. Lepton Flavor Violation in t decays • Impact of q13 in a SUSY seesaw model Antusch, Arganda, Herrero, Teixeira, JHEP 0611:090,2006

  9. LFV 5s disc B 2 B MVF-NP extensions : meg vanishes as s130 tmgis independent of s13 CMSSM : meg vanishes at all SPS points

  10. Lepton sector constraints in an SU(3)-flavored MSSM Lightest slepton mass Calibbi, Jones Perez, Masiero, Park, Porod & Vives arXiv 0907.4069v2

  11. Beyond MFV LFV from CKM LFV from PMNS 107 B (tmg) now SO(10) MSSM SuperB Super B Factory M1/2 SUSY GUT now Super B Factory Allowed by Dms From Bs phase J.K.Parry, H.-H. Zhang hep-ph/0710.5443

  12. LFV branching fraction ratios are discriminators Blanke, Buras, Duling, Recksiegel & Tarantino, arXiv:0906.545v1

  13. Polarized t’s can probe the chiral structure of LFV in a model-independent manner A longitudinally polarized electron beam, producing polarized t’s,can determinate the chiral structure of lepton flavor-violating interactions Dassinger, Feldmann, Mannel, and TurczykJHEP 0710:039,2007; [See also Matsuzaki and SandaPhys.Rev.D77:073003,2008 ]

  14. mixing is now well-established and large This raises the exciting possibility of searching for CP violation Super B Factory @ 75 ab-1 + +

  15. CP violation in DC=2 mixing in an LHT model |q/p| from D→Kp, Kpp.. 75 ab-1 LHT model Little Higgs w T parity Bigi, Blanke, Buras & Recksiegel arXiv:0904.1545v3 [hep-ph]

  16. CKM Fitter results as of Moriond 2009 The BABARand Belle CP asymmetry measurements together with improved precision in othermeasurements have produced a set of highly overconstrained tests, which grossomodo, are well-satisfied A closer look, however, reveals some issues

  17. A variety of analyses have pinpointed tensions in the UT • These are all at the 2-3 s level, but occur in several places e.g., Lunghi and Soni analysis

  18. Does the agreement of the overconstrained tests stand up to detailed scrutiny ? • There is actually some tension, and there are enough constraints to explore these issues • Caveats: • There may be Standard Model explanations for some effects • All issues are at the <3s level • Inclusive and exclusive Vub determinations are not in good agreement • There are also issues with inclusive/exclusive Vcb • The B(B→tn)conflict • The agreement of the fitted, i.e., SM-predicted value of sin 2bvs the directly measured value using tree decays and loop decays is not perfect • The Bs → ψϕphase • The Kp problem

  19. The B(B→tn)conflict Effectively a measurement of fB Determines same constraint B(B→tn)also constrains Higgs doublet models G. Eigen

  20. Is there a fourth quark generation ? • A fourth generation CKM-like mixing matrix has • 2 additional quark masses • 3 additional mixing angles • 2 additional CP-violating phases • A recent analysis by Bobrowski, Lenz, Reidl and Rohrwildshows that large regions of the new parameter spaces are still allowed • SuperB factories will be the primary tool to close this window, or, perhaps,to find significantly non-zero values ofthese fourth generation parameters q24 d14 q14 d13

  21. New physics in Bd, Bsmixing ?? There isstill room for sizeablecontributions from New Physics Model-independentparametrization for New Physics in ΔF=2 transitions The preferred (SM+NP) ΔNP value iscurrently ~ 2σfrom SM for bothBd and Bssystems To clarify: Updated Tevatron result LHCb sin2bsmeasurement

  22. W -H --g,0 b u,c,t s b u,c,t s b u,c,t s b d,s,b s CPV Probes of New Physics • In the Standard Model we expect the same value for “sin2 ” in modes, but different SUSY models can produce different asymmetries • Since the penguin modes have branching fractions one or two orders of magnitude less than tree modes, a great deal of luminosity is required to make these measurements to meaningful precision ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

  23. Squark mass matrix (dsector) Super B Factories LHC

  24. 1500 1000 500 250 SPS-4 SPS-1 SPS-9 SPS-7 SPS-8 SPS-2 SPS-3 SPS-6 SPS-5 SUSY mass spectra for the 9 Snowmass points & slopes Ghodbane and Martyn

  25. New Physics in CPV: sin2b from s Penguins… W- Many channels can show effects in the range DS~(0.01-0.04) s b f t s SuperB 75 ab-1 B0d s d d K0 ~ g ~ b s ~ b s X (*) theory limited

  26. BgfK0 at 50/ab with present WA value J/yK0 fK0

  27. Kinematic distributions in 1 0.5 FL 0 1 SM C7= – C7SM 0.5 AFB 0

  28. Much more data is required for a definitive result • Can be pursued with exclusive or inclusive reconstruction • A measure of the relative merits is the precision in determination of the zero Exclusive Inclusive Theory error: 9% + O(L/mb) uncertainty Egede, Hurth, Matias, Ramon, Reece arxiv:0807.2589 Experimental error (SHLC): 2.1% Theory error: ~5% Huber, Hurth, Lunghi arxiv:0712.3009 Experimental error (Super B Factory): 4-6%

  29. The pattern of deviation from the SM values is diagnostic

  30. A Super B Factory is a DNA chip for New Physics

  31. Conclusions • Shake the box physics will play a vital role in understanding new physics found at LHC • A full set of constraints requires studies of EDMs, (g-2)m, rare m and t decays, me conversion and rare K, D and B decays • High statistics (50-75 ab-1 ) data samples at e+e- Super B Factories provide both • discovery potential • charged lepton flavor violation • CPV in mixing, and • A DNA chip to discriminate between model of New Physics • The achievable levels of sensitivity in rare b, c and  decays provide substantial coverage in the parameter space • The Super B Factory programs, of course, overlap with the programs of LHC flavor experiments such as LHCb, but the e+e- environment makes possible a substantial number of unique and important physics measurements in areas sensitive to New Physics

  32. B Physics: (4S) Charm mixing and CPV Charm FCNC Bs Physics: (5S)  Physics

More Related