1 / 24

NWEA 2011 - RIT Scale Norms

NWEA 2011 - RIT Scale Norms. Some Things You Should Know About the 2011 RIT Scale Norms Prepared by: Dan Henderson, NWEA Partner Relations Region Manager John Woodin, NWEA Partner Relations State Representative. Introduction. “No, your students’ performance didn’t change from last spring.”

teleri
Download Presentation

NWEA 2011 - RIT Scale Norms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NWEA 2011 - RIT Scale Norms Some Things You Should Know About the 2011 RIT Scale Norms Prepared by: Dan Henderson, NWEA Partner Relations Region Manager John Woodin, NWEA Partner Relations State Representative

  2. Introduction • “No, your students’ performance didn’t change from last spring.” • The norm group and methodology did change • Simply creates a different comparison • A 215 RIT is still a 215 RIT – means the same thing related to performance

  3. Key Differences from 2008 • Methodology: set of norms more representative of school age population • Everyone will see some changes: status and growth norms • Norms have been applied to both past and current scores (for consistency and growth projections)

  4. What will be “fixed” in the 2011 Norms… • Asterisks * will be replaced with 1 or 99 (percentiles) • Kindergarten growth norms will be reinstated for fall to spring • Kindergarten status norms will be reinstated for fall and winter • 11th grade norms will be reinstated as soon as possible

  5. Sampling student test records • “Students” were randomly sampled from a pool of test event records. (all test records of the student from the study period in the subject of interest) • Pool represented about 5.1 million students, • from 13,000 schools • located in more than 2,700 school districts • from over 50 states and • contained about 35 million test events. • Smallest grade level sample was about 20,000 students.

  6. Post-stratification procedures • Based on school-level variables commonly associated with challenges and opportunities • School–level variables: Mix of student ethnicity, percent free/reduced lunch eligibility, Title 1 eligibility, ALL Title 1, grade range served, charter status, magnet status, enrollment at each grade, total enrollment, school level, school type, school locale, pupil-teacher ratio. • Combined to form a School Challenge Index (SCI) for each state – using ALL schools in the state, not only NWEA schools • SCI was used as a post-stratification weight for all analyses

  7. Differences in Status Norms • Minor changes in status norms • Percentiles changed very little • Larger changes for grades 1 & 2 for high and low achieving students • Difference in partner base (more schools and students than 2008) • Different methodology for selection which results in more representative norms

  8. Difference in Growth Norms • Less difference in the middle of achievement continuum • Larger differences at the two ends of achievement (especially extremes) • High or low achievers may see larger differences in growth projections • Low Achievers: lower grow projections than in the past • High Achievers: higher growth projections

  9. Growth in 2008 Norm study Pt. A FALL Pt. B Spring Growth within the grade only

  10. * How growth is conceptualized Instructional weeks 54 72 82 36 1 students 1 2 All scores included 3 4 . 5 . 6 . All scores included

  11. Flat Growth Rates • Growth projections tend to be flatter in 2011 than the 2008 norms • Grades 5, 6, 8 show flat growth in Math • In a large national sample, students in these grades tended to show similar growth regardless of where they were on the RIT scale • Due to sampling methods – overly large impact of extreme scores in 2008

  12. Applying Growth to Past Terms • Since NWEA uses growth norms that overlap from year to year – had to apply the norms backward • Cannot compare 2008 growth norms to 2011 growth norms – not comparable

More Related