Pre-k Messaging: Positives and Pitfalls? April 22, 2008

1. Pre-k Messaging: Positives and Pitfalls? April 22, 2008

2. Agenda • Messaging ResearchMatt Mulkey, Pre-k Now • Experiences in KansasTom Krebs, KASB • Tying Message to School ReformChrisanne Gayl, NSBA • Committee Next StepsKathleen Branch, NSBA • Your QuestionsModerated by Katherine Shek, NSBA

3. Messaging Research Matt MulkeyDirector of CommunicationsPre-K Now 202.862.9864 voice mmulkey@preknow.org www.preknow.org

4. The ABCs of Pre-k Messaging • “Pre-kindergarten” and “pre-k” convey a program that is: • educational in nature; • connected and aligned with K-12 continuum; and • intended for three- and/or four-year-old children. • “Pre-k for all” – not “universal pre-k” • Positive words and phrases to use with “pre-k” • “voluntary” • “quality” or “high-quality” • “effective” • “research-based” • “lasting benefits”

5. The Pre-k Now Message Box • Pre-k benefits all children. • Pre-k should not be considered a special program for the disadvantaged or a privilege for the wealthy. • Pre-k is a proven solution. • Decades of solid research have proven that children who attend high-quality pre-k have stronger social, reading, and math skills. • Pre-k is the first step to improving K-12 education. • Children who attend high-quality pre-k are better prepared for school and require less special attention, allowing teachers to spend more time teaching all students.

6. Play to Your Audience • With parents & families (the general public): • emphasize social and emotional benefits • stick to shorter-term benefits • stress “voluntary” and “for all” • With business & community leaders: • emphasize benefits to workforce and quality of life • talk about pre-k’s return on investment and savings • With existing pre-k or child care providers: • emphasize collaboration (“diverse delivery”) and improvements to quality and compensation • talk about maximizing resources and serving more children, not creating competition

7. Prepare for the Tough Questions • How much will this cost? • Have numbers ready, even if just a range • Talk about return on investment and savings • Don’t the benefits fade out over time? • Never use the words “fade out” • Talk about the many lasting benefits • Note that remediation can work but is costlier • Do teachers really need a bachelor’s degree? • Stress that programs with bachelor-degreed teachers have strongest evidence on benefits and that the quality of the teacher is the single most important factor in achieving positive outcomes for children

8. Prepare for the Tough Questions • Why should we pay for rich kids? • Point out that many children from middle- and upper-income families enter school unprepared • Talk about collective benefits and consequences • Isn’t this going to put private providers out of business? • Stress that just the opposite is true; effective programs collaborate and, through incentives and technical assistance, improve quality and stability • Doesn’t “diverse delivery” mean school vouchers? • Stress that they are worlds apart; “diverse delivery” uses contracts and insists on high quality standards

9. Experiences in Kansas Tom KrebsGovernmental Relations SpecialistKansas Association of School Boardstkrebs@kasb.org

10. What Are KASB’s Focus Areas? • Build coalitions between the multitude of stakeholders/providers • Assist in the support of legislative and executive branch leaders who support early childhood and Pre-K efforts • Educate/re-educate public and membership about the need for Pre-K and early childhood programs

11. Steps We Took To Help • Started meeting early on with stakeholders and assisted in coalition efforts • Assessed what was present in Kansas schools and districts in ways of programs • Developed contact list of policy makers • Held regional forums with stakeholders • Developed a comprehensive Pre-K early childhood policy for KASB

12. KASB Regionals, October 2007 • We held 10 KASB regional meetings where the key issue of Pre-K and early childhood education were discussed with our members • 5-15 board members and/or superintendents • Focus was sharing research from the Center on the Developing Child • http://www.developingchild.harvard.edu/

13. Regional Forums, November 2007 • Partnered with the Kansas Coalition for School Readiness, • Has built a private-public partnership • Been a player this legislative session • Each drew 20-100 participants • Built large data base for identifying, articulating concerns • http://www.kasb.org/forums%20data.pdf

14. More Follow-Up, February 2008 • ½ day of Governmental Relations Seminar dedicated to Pre-K progress • Investing in Early Childhood – The National Perspective • Investing in Early Childhood – The Legislative Perspective • School Readiness in Kansas – Issues in the 2008 session • School Readiness Programs Overview • Held ½ day conversation with board members and Pre-K leaders

15. What’s Been the Impact? • Lack of legislative champions, money translates to few successes to date • Governance bills sailed through Senate, then stalled • New tobacco money could get picked off • New/better educated legislators, who get more pressure from home, particularly board members • Common board member comment: It’s necessary, but where’s the money?

16. Tying Message to School Reform Chrisanne GaylDirector, Federal ProgramsNational School Boards Association(703) 838-6763cgayl@nsba.org

17. Tying Pre-k to School Reform • Children who have attended high-quality pre-k are better readers in elementary school than their peers who have not attended pre-k. • Children who have attended high-quality pre-k show higher achievement on math assessments. • High-quality pre-k is critical to helping districts and states meet the goals and expectations of No Child Left Behind.

20. Research • The Effects of State Pre-kindergarten Programs on Young Children's School Readiness in Five States • Examines the effects of state-funded programs in Michigan, New Jersey, Oklahoma, South Carolina and West Virginia http://nieer.org/docs/?DocID=129 • The Effects of Universal Pre-K on Cognitive Development • Study of Oklahoma’s pre-K program http://www.apa.org/journals/releases/dev416872.pdf • Center for Public Education • www.centerforpubliceducation.org

21. On the Hill • Update on No Child Left Behind • Possible Stand-Alone Legislation • H.R. 3289 – Providing Resources Early for Kids Act “Pre-K Act” introduced by Rep. Hirono (D-HI)

22. Pre-K Act • Provides grants to states to: • Increase the number of early childhood educators with BA degrees • Improve student-teacher ratios; decrease group size • Provide comprehensive services such as health screenings and nutritional assistance • Increase the hours/day and weeks/year of programs • Expand programs provided certain quality indicators are met • Authorized at $ 1 billion for each of next 5 years

23. Committee Next Steps Kathleen BranchManager, Federal Advocacy ProgramsNational School Boards Association703-838-6735kbranch@nsba.org

24. Pre-k Legislative Committee Next Steps • Call to Action • Feedback from Committee members and members of Congress • Survey

25. Questions? Katherine ShekLegislative AnalystNational School Boards Association(703) 535-1627kshek@nsba.org