300 likes | 505 Views
Real. Local ULIRGs and Quasars. S. Veilleux (U. Maryland). AGN activity Host Properties Environments Galactic Winds. Observed. Three Pagodas, Dali, China (8/15/05). Ground-based Optical Spectroscopy. log(L IR /L Sun ) < 11 11 – 11.99 12 – 12.29 12.3 – 12.8
E N D
Real Local ULIRGs and Quasars S. Veilleux (U. Maryland) • AGN activity • Host Properties • Environments • Galactic Winds Observed Three Pagodas, Dali, China (8/15/05)
Ground-based Optical Spectroscopy log(LIR/LSun) < 11 11 – 11.99 12 – 12.29 12.3 – 12.8 Total = 29 68 77 31 (SV et al. 1995; Kim, SV, & Sanders 1998; SV, Kim, & Sanders 1999; also Kewley, Dopita et al.) • Fraction of Seyfert nuclei: • ~ 5 % @ log[LIR/LSun] = 10 – 11 • ~ 50% @ log[LIR/LSun] > 12.3
Ground-based vs HST/STIS (Farrah, Surace, SV, Sanders, & Vacca 2005) Ground: H II S2 S2 H II HST: S2 S1 S2 mini-BALQSO
F05189-2524 red F05189-2524 blue F05189-2524 UV Very Highly Ionized!
Search for Obscured QSOs with CXO/XMM (Teng, Wilson, SV, Young, Sanders, & Nagar 2005) AGN ULIRGs L2 – 10 keV/LFIR • Trends with IRASf25/f60 color • Evidence for hidden QSOs in a few sources (also: Ptak et al. 2003; Franceschini et al. 2003) *burst “cool”f25/f60 “warm”
NIR Spectroscopy (SV, Sanders, & Kim 1997, 1999) • NIR signatures of AGN in most Seyfert ULIRGs, but not in LINER or HII ULIRGs (also Goldader+95, Murphy+01a, Lutz+02, and spectropolarimetry…) • L(BLR) / L(BOL): most ULIRGs with BLR are AGN-dominated
ISO Spectroscopy (Tran et al. 2001) • Excellent agreement between optical/NIR and ISO classifications(e.g., Genzel et al. 1998; Lutz et al. 1999; Rigopoulou et al. 1999; Lutz, SV, & Genzel 1999; Tran et al. 2001) AGN *burst
QUEST:Quasar/ULIRG Evolutionary STudy • Medium-size Cycle-1 Spitzer program (95.3 hrs) • Maryland: S. Veilleux (PI), D.-C. Kim, D. Rupke, A. Baker • MPE: R. Genzel (co-PI), E. Sturm (Project Scientist), D. Lutz, …….. L. Tacconi, M. Lehnert, A. Contursi, K. Dasyra, M. Schweitzer • Hawaii: D. Sanders, J. Barnes, R. Joseph, A. Stockton, O. Guyon • IPAC: J. Mazzarella, S. Lord • Tel Aviv U.: H. Netzer,A. Sternberg • CWRU: C. Mihos
QUEST:Quasar/ULIRG Evolutionary STudy • Sample: • 29 1-Jy ULIRGs + 25 PG QSOs • Z < 0.3 • This set of objects samples the full range of infrared luminosity and colors, merger state, and AGN/starburst fraction • SST Data • Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) • Low-resolution spectra: 5 – 14 m (SL2, SL1) • High-resolution spectra: 10 – 37 m (SH, LH) • High S/N
QUEST:Quasar/ULIRG Evolutionary STudy • Ancillary Data • Optical & NIR ground-based imaging (Veilleux, Kim, Guyon, Sanders) • NIR HST/NICMOS imaging (PI: Veilleux) • NIR VLT spectroscopy (PI: Tacconi) • Evolutionary stage of the merger • Structure and dynamics of ULIRG progenitors • Structure and dynamics of ULIRG and QSO hosts • Locations of ULIRGs and QSOs in the fundamental plane of ellipticals • SST/IRS spectra of optically- and infrared-selected LINERs (PI: Sturm)
Silicate Emissions in AGN: From LINERs to QSOs (Sturm et al. 2005; see also Hao et al. 2005; Siebenmorgen et al. 2005) • Signature of dust “obscuring torus” viewed face-on? • But: • Tdust ~ 200 K << T(torus walls) • Not all Type 1 objects show silicate emission features • QSOs vs LINERs: dust composition? Grain size? Crystallization? AGN *burst
R K′ Hosts of Local ULIRGs • R and K´ images of 118 ULIRGs in 1-Jy sample (SV, Kim, & Sanders 2002) • Most of the 1-Jy sources are in the late stages of a merger • Remnants are often elliptical-like 1-Jy Sample
Data n=1 n = 4 Deep HST H-band Imaging .27 1-Jy ULIRGs . 6 PG QSOs U U Q Q Low Surface Brightness Features (SV, Kim, Peng, Ho, et al. 2005) • Signs of mergers visible in all ULIRGs and PG QSOs • Large-scale stellar disks visible in some systems
GALFIT Analysis: PSF + Sérsic component (SV, Kim, Peng, Ho, et al. 2005) n = 3.96 n = 1.0 n = 4.0
Low Surface Brightness Disks in ULIRGs and PG QSOs • Bulge + Disk in 3 objects • Lobsided or tidally-shredded “disks” in possibly 5 additional objects Data Residuals Disk Bulge Data Residuals Disk Bulge (SV, et al. 2005) Data Residuals Disk Bulge
Unsuspected Binaries (SV, et al. 2005) • M….
Trends between Dominant Morphological Types, Spectral Types, and Infrared Colors (SV, et al. 2005) • M….
Strength of tidal features (SV, et al. 2005) Tidal features are weaker among warm, AGN-like, early-type systems Strength of tidal features
Sizes and Magnitudes of ULIRG & PG QSO Hosts (SV, et al. 2005) <re> ~ 2.7 kpc <LH> ~ (1.5 ± 1) LH*
Photometric Fundamental Plane ULIRG & PG QSOs: Intermediate-mass ( ~ 1-2 m*) elliptical / lenticular galaxies .(consistent with Genzel et al. 2001; Tacconi et al. 2002; Dasyra et al. 2005) (SV, et al. 2005)
Environments of 1Jy ULIRGs (Zauderer, SV, & Yee 2005 in prep) ARC 3 • Bgc Cluster-Galaxy correlation amplitude (e.g., Longair & Seldner 1979; Yee & López-Cruz 1999) • <BGC> = 95 ± 16 Mpc1.77 • No obvious dependence on spectral type 2 1 0 * Starbursts ∙ LINERs ▲Seyfert 2s ∙ Seyfert 1s
Environments of 1Jy ULIRGs (Zauderer, SV, & Yee 2005) • Red = 1Jy ULIRGs • Blue = RQ QSOs + RL QSOs + RGs (McLure & Dunlop 2001) (cf. Tacconi et al. 2002) 4 3 2 1 0
Environments of 1Jy ULIRGs (Zauderer, SV, & Yee 2005) • Red = 1-Jy ULIRGs • Black = Seyferts (de Robertis et al. 1998)
NGC 1482 [N II] / H Galactic Winds (SV, Cecil, & Bland-Hawthorn 2005, ARAA; astro-ph/0504435) Blueshifted Na ID absorption lines (78 starbursts) (SV & Rupke 2002) NGC 3079 HST + CXO % (Rupke, SV, & Sanders ‘02, ’05ab; also Martin 05) (Cecil, Bland-Hawthorn, & SV 2002)
NGC 1482 [N II] / H Galactic Winds (SV, Cecil, & Bland-Hawthorn 2005, ARAA; astro-ph/0504435) Blueshifted Na ID absorption lines (78 starbursts) (SV & Rupke 2002) NGC 3079 HST + CXO (Rupke, SV, & Sanders ‘02, ’05ab) Na ID (Cecil, Bland-Hawthorn, & SV 2002)
Neutral Winds in Nearby LIRGs 80% Starburst99 30% Starburst99 Starbursts Seyfert 2s Seyfert 1s Dwarfs (SM04) (Rupke, SV, & Sanders 2005abc) log (LIR) ~
Neutral Winds in Nearby LIRGs 80% Starburst99 30% Starburst99 Starbursts Seyfert 2s Seyfert 1s Dwarfs (SM04) (Rupke, SV, & Sanders 2005abc) log (LIR) ~
Summary • AGN activity is present (and often dominant) in: • > 30% of all local ULIRGs • >50% of local ULIRGs with log[LIR/Lsun] > 12.3 • Stay tuned for upcoming SST results… • Hosts: • Warm AGN-like systems have • prominent spheroids • weaker tidal features and stronger nuclei than cool LINER / HII systems • They are in the final phase of a merger • The luminosities, sizes, and stellar masses of PG QSO hostscoincidewith those of E-like 1-Jy ULIRGs • Environments: (preliminary) • 1-Jy ULIRGs live in low-density environments although there are exceptions • Good but not perfect overlap with environments of local Seyferts and QSOs • Galactic Winds: • Winds are present in virtually all ULIRGs • <Vout >, <dM/dt>, and <dE/dt> are very significant and probably affect evolution
(SV, 08/15/05) Summary • AGN activity is present (and often dominant) in: • > 30% of all local ULIRGs • > 50% of local ULIRGs with log[LIR/Lsun] > 12.3 • Stay tuned for upcoming SST results… • Hosts: • Warm AGN-like systems have • prominent spheroids • weaker tidal features and stronger nuclei than cool LINER / HII systems • They are in the final phase of a merger • The luminosities, sizes, and stellar masses of PG QSO hostscoincidewith those of E-like 1-Jy ULIRGs • Environments: (preliminary) • 1-Jy ULIRGs live in low-density environments although there are exceptions • Good but not perfect overlap with environments of local Seyferts and QSOs • Galactic Winds: • Winds are present in virtually all ULIRGs • <Vout >, <dM/dt>, and <dE/dt> are very significant and probably affect evolution