1 / 39

Quantum Dots in Photonic Structures

Lecture 7: Low dimensional structures. Quantum Dots in Photonic Structures. Wednesdays , 17.00 , SDT. Jan Suffczyński. Projekt Fizyka Plus nr POKL.04.01.02-00-034/11 współfinansowany przez Unię Europejską ze środków Europejskiego

thea
Download Presentation

Quantum Dots in Photonic Structures

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture 7: Lowdimensionalstructures Quantum Dots in PhotonicStructures Wednesdays, 17.00, SDT Jan Suffczyński Projekt Fizyka Plus nr POKL.04.01.02-00-034/11 współfinansowany przez Unię Europejską ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Kapitał Ludzki

  2. Plan for today Reminder 2. Doping and holes 3. Lowdimensionalstructures

  3. Wigner-Seitz Cellconstruction Form connection to all neighbors and span a plane normal to the connecting line at half distance

  4. Envelope part Periodic (unit cell) part Bloch waves Bloch’stheorem: Solutions of the Schrodingerequation Felix Bloch 1905, Zürich - 1983, Zürich for the wave in periodicpotential U(r) = U(r+R) are: Bloch function: modified slide from Rob Engelen

  5. Nearlyfreeelectron model Origin of a band gap! Kittel

  6. Isolated Atoms

  7. Diatomic Molecule

  8. Four Closely Spaced Atoms conduction band valence band

  9. Band formation

  10. Electronicenergybands allowed energybands

  11. Brilluoinzones e (k): single parabola folded parabola

  12. Electronvelocity and effective mass in the k-space

  13. Electronvelocity and effective mass in the k-space Velocityis zero at the top and bottom of energy band.

  14. Electronvelocity and effective mass in the k-space Velocityis zero at the top and bottom of energy band, the. Efective mass: m*>0 at the band bottom, m*<0at the band top,in the middle:m*→±∞(effective mass descriptionfailshere).

  15. Doping of semiconductors

  16. Holes • Consider an insulator (or semiconductor) with a few electrons excited from the valence band into the conduction band • Apply an electric field • Now electrons in the valence band have some energy statesinto which they can move • The movement is complicated since it involves ~ 1023 electrons

  17. Holes • We can “replace” electrons at the top of the band which have “negative” mass (and travel in opposite to the “normal” direction) by positively charged particles with a positive mass, and consider all phenomena using such particles • Such particles are called Holes • Holes are usually heavier than electrons since they depict collective behavior of many electrons

  18. Low-dimensionalstructures

  19. Dimensionality Increase of the dimension in one direction Increase of the volume 1 2 21 2 22 2 2 23

  20. B A B B A B A z z z Low-dimensionalstructures quantum dot quantum wire quantum well

  21. V x=0 x=L Discrete States • Quantum confinement  discrete states • Energy levels from solutions to Schrodinger Equation • Schrodinger equation: • For 1D infinite potential well • If confinement in only 1D (x), in the other 2 directions  energy continuum

  22. Quantum Wells Energy of the firstconfinedlevel Decrease of the levelenergywhenwidth of the Quantum Welldecreased W. Tsang, E. Schubert, APL’1986

  23. Quantum Wells Energy of confinedlevels GaAs/AlGaAs Quantum Well R. Dingle, Festkorperprobleme’1975

  24. In 3D… • For 3D infinite potential boxes • Simple treatment considered • Potential barrier is not an infinite box • Spherical confinement, harmonic oscillator (quadratic) potential • Only a single electron • Multi-particle treatment • Electrons and holes • Effective mass mismatch at boundary

  25. Density of states

  26. Quantum Dots

  27. QD asanartificialatom

  28. QD as anartificial atom

  29. QD as anartificial atom- differences

  30. QD size • Should be small enough to see quantum effect • kBTat 4.2 K ~0.36 meV--> for electron maximum dimension in 1D ~100-200 nm • Small sizelarger energy level separation (Energy levels must be sufficiently separated to remain distinguishable under broadening, e.g. thermal)

  31. QD types and fabricationmethods • Goal: to engineer potential energy barriers to confine electrons in 3 dimensions • Basic types/methods • Colloidal chemistry • Electrostatic • Lithography • Epitaxy • Fluctuation • Self-organized • Patternedgrowth - „Defect” QDs

  32. Colloidal Particles • Engineer reactions to precipitate quantum dots from solutions or a host material (e.g. polymer) • In some cases, need to “cap” the surface so the dot remains chemically stable (i.e. bond other molecules on the surface) • Can form “core-shell” structures • Typically group II-VI materials (e.g. CdS, CdSe) • Size variations ( “size dispersion”) Si nanocrystal, NREL CdSe core with ZnS shell QDs Red: bigger dots! Blue: smaller dots! Evident Technologies: http://www.evidenttech.com/products/core_shell_evidots/overview.php Sample papers: Steigerwald et al. Surface derivation and isolation of semiconductor cluster molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988.

  33. ElectrostaticallydefinedQDs • Only one type of particles (electronorholes) confined • --> (No spectroscopy)

  34. LithographydefinedQDs QW • QW etching and overgrowth Etching Verma/NIST Overgrowth • Mismatch of bandgaps potential energy well • The advantage: QD shapingand positioning • The drawback: pooropticalsignal (dislocationsdue to the etching!)

  35. LithographydefinedQDs V. B. Verma et al., Opt. Express’2011

  36. Lithography • Etch pillars in quantum well heterostructures • Quantum well heterostructures give 1D confinement • Pillars provide confinement in the other 2 dimensions • Disadvantages: Slow, contamination, low density, defect formation A. Scherer and H.G. Craighead. Fabrication of small laterally patterned multiple quantum wells. Appl. Phys. Lett., Nov 1986.

  37. FlucutationtypeQDs Flucutation of QW thickness Flucutation of QW composition

  38. Epitaxy: Self-Organized Growth Self-organized QDs through epitaxial growth strains • Stranski-Krastanov growth mode (use MBE, MOCVD) • Islands formed on wetting layer due to lattice mismatch (size ~10snm) • Disadvantage: size and shape fluctuations, strain, • Control island initiation • Induce local strain, grow on dislocation, vary growth conditions, combine with patterning Lattice-mismatchinduced islandgrowth

More Related