1 / 12

Kent & Medway Progression Federation

Kent & Medway Progression Federation. Monitoring and evaluating the work of KMPF. Sharon Smith Research and Evaluation Manager. Monitoring & Evaluation. Monitoring: Who are we working with? What type of activities are we delivering, when and how many?

thetis
Download Presentation

Kent & Medway Progression Federation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kent & Medway Progression Federation Monitoring and evaluating the work of KMPF Sharon Smith Research and Evaluation Manager

  2. Monitoring & Evaluation • Monitoring: • Who are we working with? • What type of activities are we delivering, when and how many? • How many participants are we engaging? • Evaluation: • How effective are our activities and how can they be improved? • What is the impact of our activities on student outcomes: • Attainment • Progression

  3. Monitoring & Evaluation - we all play a part!

  4. KMPF Monitoring • 2012-13 Activity Delivery 2 Local Authorities

  5. KMPF Monitoring • 2012-13 Student Participation 21905 Student exchanges 40 schools 12893 participants 2 Local Authorities

  6. KMPF Monitoring • 2012-13 Student Participants by year group 2 Local Authorities

  7. KMPF Evaluation What impact does outreach have on progression to Higher Education? Tracked 15945 Aimhigher/KMPF participants at age 18 to HE datasets 57% are from an area classified as low HE participation where less than one in five young people enter HE 86% are first generation HE 35% 33% National Young HE Participation Rate (2004-2009) AHKM/ KMPF HE Participation Rate (2007-2011)

  8. KMPF Evaluation Students from neighbourhoods with traditionally low HE progression: 26% 20% National Young HE Participation Rate POLAR3 Q1 – disadvantaged 2010:11 AHKM/KMPF Young HE Participation Rate POLAR 3 Quintile 1, (2010:11)

  9. KMPF Evaluation What is the relationship between level of outreach participation and HE progression?

  10. KMPF Evaluation What is the relationship between type of outreach participation and HE progression?

  11. KMPF Evaluation Where Ambassadors have come in to work regularly with some of our A level students, it has had a powerful, positive impact on their learning and attitudes to higher education. KMPF School Staff Member They were fun activities and I want to do it again! Student Year 9 It 's nice to talk to people who are at, or have been to University recently. Student Year 12 KMPF (Aimhigher) have been a vital part of our students life in the last 5 years and we have seen a 30% increase in our students deciding to stay on in and consider HE in the future. The work is paramount for a school like ours which is based in a highly social and economically deprived area. Head Teacher – Swan Valley School Talks in school are not always the most exciting for students; going to a university and getting a taste of the potential future is effective. KMPF School Staff Member The lecture was too long but still interesting and useful Student Year 11 attending a Maths Lecture

  12. To all Federation members who help us to collect data: THANK YOU! Without this data we would not be able to measure the impact we are having on student outcomes KMPF@canterbury.ac.uk 01227 782565 www.kmpf.org

More Related