1 / 14

California’s water problems as global problems – pitfalls and solutions

California’s water problems as global problems – pitfalls and solutions. A litany of challenges: Population pressures (demands) Regional growth patterns (demands) Supply options Supply vulnerability Climate change/variability Ecological concerns Urban vs. agricultural competition.

thor
Download Presentation

California’s water problems as global problems – pitfalls and solutions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. California’s water problems as global problems – pitfalls and solutions • A litany of challenges: • Population pressures (demands) • Regional growth patterns (demands) • Supply options • Supply vulnerability • Climate change/variability • Ecological concerns • Urban vs. agricultural competition

  2. Population growth and water • California’s population is projected to increase by more than 50% by 2025 (1995 as base year) – faster than any other state. • This rate-of-growth = roughly half a million new residents per year (Department of Finance, 2007). • Over half this growth will occur in hotter inland counties. This is likely to increase urban water demands 50-60%. Significance? • These are areas characterized by high evapo-transpiration rates. • Also, regions where water conservation methods not widely utilized.

  3. Precipitation patterns in California 1961-1990 – Cal DWR

  4. Per capita water use by region of state

  5. Supply options for California Likely future Source: California Water Plan Update, 2005 (CA DWR)

  6. Traditional solutions - more dams? Number and size of reservoirs completed by decade

  7. Supply vulnerability • Between 20 - 30 million Californians rely on: • State Water Project (SWP) • Central Valley Project (CVP) • Both are vulnerable from events that could precipitate sudden disruptions in supply (e.g., seismic events, floods, acts of terrorism). • 17 million rely on Colorado River: • California must reduce its previous reliance on 4.4 million acre/feet to under 3 million acre feet. • Draws attention to need for “new” sources of water (e.g., waste-water reuse, conservation).

  8. Diamond Valley Reservoir – one example of how to respond to vulnerability • Built in Riverside county (1999) to provide “critical water storage for MWD of S. California,” south of Delta and West of San Andreas fault. • Capacity at full pool = 800,000 acre/feet or enough water for 3.2 million (enough for 6 months emergency supply in event of an earthquake.)

  9. Climate change impacts to California’s water • 1. less spring snowmelt • 2. more winter runoff • 3. runoff not storable due to flood control needs • 4. Less snowmelt = lower early summer storage; less hydro-power • 5. Sea level rise: levee problems in Delta; more saltwater intrusion; adverse effects on coastal marshes, wildlife.

  10. California, water, and climate change • Likely to change precipitation patterns – already difficult to forecast in a state where 80% of water goes for agriculture. • Climate change could raise the elevation of snow levels with reduced spring snowmelt and more winter runoff: • Added winter runoff not storable because of flood control needs. • Less snowmelt = lower early summer storage at foothill reservoirs. • Less hydroelectric power production. • Higher temperatures + reduced snowmelt = less suitable cold water habitat for salmon; higher temperatures will increase demand for water by plants. • Greater frequency of large damaging fires. • Sea level rise.

  11. Sea level rise Source: California EPA – Golden Gate tidal gauge at entrance to San Francisco Bay • Sea level rise: • Affects Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta levees; more saltwater intrusion. • Could adversely affect many coastal marshes and wildlife reserves.

  12. Integrated water management • Goal: balance water supply and demand by identifying feasible alternatives that meet the test of least cost without sacrificing other needs. • Principal Methods: • Demand management by utilities (e.g., conservation pricing) – discussed previously. • Depleted aquifer recharge/seasonal groundwater recharge. • Wastewater reuse/recycling. • Regional planning & collaboration to capitalize on existing resources, eliminate duplication, manage growth, avoid cost of new supplies.

  13. Aquifer recharge • Becoming more popular – locally as well as world-wide • Orange County, Los Angeles • Advantages: • Permits sensible storage, seasonally-needed supplies. • Re-fill during wet seasons; use during dry periods – “conjunctive use.” • Storage serves multiple purposes (e.g., preventing salt water intrusion). • Disadvantages: • Costly – can be more expensive than surface water storage.

  14. Anaheim Lake, Orange County Water District recharge basin. • One of 9 deep recharge basins in O.C – on Santa Ana River. • Fishing and recreation permitted. • Shoreline is a “conservation easement” designed to control development, ensure high-quality runoff.

More Related