1 / 27

Chapter 36 Quality Engineering (Part 1) (Review) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Fall, 2010

Chapter 36 Quality Engineering (Part 1) (Review) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Fall, 2010. Objective of Quality Engineering : Systematic reduction of variability , as shown in Figure 36 – 1.

thyra
Download Presentation

Chapter 36 Quality Engineering (Part 1) (Review) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Fall, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 36Quality Engineering(Part 1)(Review)EIN 3390 Manufacturing ProcessesFall, 2010

  2. Objective of Quality Engineering: Systematic reduction of variability, as shown in Figure 36 – 1. Variability is measured by sigma, s, standard deviation, which decreases with reduction in variability. Variation can be reduced by the application of statistical techniques, such as multiple variable analysis, ANOVA – Analysis of Variance, designed experiments, and Taguchi methods. 36.1 Introduction

  3. QE History: - Acceptance sampling - Statistical Process Control (SPC) - Companywide Quality Control (CWQC) and Total Quality Control (TQC) - Six Sigma, DOE (Design of Experiment), Taguchi methods - Lean Manufacturing: “Lean" is a production practice that considers the expenditure of resources for any goal other than the creation of value for the end customer to be wasteful, and thus a target for elimination - Poka-Yoke: developed by a Japanese manufacturing engineer named Shigeo Shingo who developed the concept. poka yoke (pronounced "poh-kahyoh-kay") means to avoid (yokeru) inadvertent errors (poka). 36.1 Introduction

  4. Process Control Methods FIGURE 36-1 Over many years, many techniques have been used to reduce the variability in products and processes.

  5. In manufacturing process, there are two groups of causes for variations: • Chance causes – produces random variations, which are inherent and stable source of variation • Assignable causes – that can be detected and eliminated to help improve the process. 36.1 Introduction

  6. Manufacturing process is determined by measuring the output of the process • In quality control, the process is examined to determine whether or not the product conforms the design’s specification, usually the nominal size and tolerance 36.1 Introduction

  7. Accuracy is reflected in your aim (the average of all your shorts, see Fig 36 – 2) Precision reflects the repeatability of the process. Process Capacity (PC) study quantifies the inherent accuracy and precision. Objectives: - root out problems that can cause defective products during production, and - design the process to prevent the problem. 36.1 Introduction

  8. FIGURE 36-2 The concepts of accuracy (aim) and precision (repeatability) are shown in the four target outcomes. Accuracy refers to the ability of the process to hit the true value (nominal) on the average, while precision is a measure of the inherent variability of the process. Accuracy vs. Precision

  9. The nature of process refers to both the variability (or inherent uniformity) and the accuracy or the aim of the process. Examples of assignable causes of variation in process : multiple machines for the same components, operator plunders, defective materials, progressive wear in tools. 36.2 Determining Process Capability

  10. Sources of inherent variability in the process: variation in material properties, operators variability, vibration and chatter. These kinds of variations usually display a random nature and often cannot be eliminated. In quality control terms, these variations are referred to as chance causes. 36.2 Determining Process Capability

  11. The objective of PC study is to determine the inherent nature of the process as compared to the desired specifications. The output of the process must be examined under normal conditions, the inputs (e.g. materials, setups, cycle times, temperature, pressure, and operator) are fixed or standardized. The process is allowed to run without tinkering or adjusting, while output is documented including time, source, and order production. 36.2 Making PC Studies by Traditional Methods

  12. Histogram is a frequency distribution. Histogram shows raw data and desired value, along with the upper specification limit (USL) and lower specification limit (LSL). A run chart shows the same data but the data are plotted against time. The statistical data are used to estimate the mean and standard deviation of the distribution. 36.2 Making PC Studies by Traditional Methods

  13. 1.001 Process Capability FIGURE 36-3 The process capability study compares the part as made by the manufacturing process to the specifications called for by the designer. Measurements from the parts are collected for run charts and for histograms for analysis—see Figure 36-4.

  14. FIGURE 36-4 Example of calculations to obtain estimates of the mean (m) and standard deviation (s) of a process Example of Process Control

  15. m +-3s defines the natural capacity limits of the process, assuming the process is approximately normally distributed. A sample is of a specified, limited size and is drawn from the population. Population is the large source of items, which can include all items the process will produce under specified condition. Fig. 36 – 5 shows a typical normal curve and the areas under the curve is defined by the standard deviation. Fig. 36 – 6 shows other distributions. 36.2 Making PC Studies by Traditional Methods

  16. FIGURE 36-5 The normal or bell-shaped curve with the areas within 1s, 2s, and 3s for a normal distribution; 68.26% of the observations will fall within 1s from the mean, and 99.73% will fall within 3s from the mean. Normal Distribution

  17. A histogram is a representation of a frequency distribution that uses rectangles whose widths represent class intervals and whose heights are proportional to the corresponding frequencies. All the observations within in an interval are considered to have the same value, which is the midpoint of the interval. A histogram is a picture that describes the variation in a progress. Histogram is used to 1) determine the process capacity, 2) compare the process with specification, 3) to suggest the shape of the population, and 4) indicate discrepancy in data. Disadvantages: 1) Trends aren’t shown, and 2) Time isn’t counted. 36.2 Histograms

  18. FIGURE 36-7 Histogram shows the output mean m from the process versus nominal and the tolerance specified by the designer versus the spread as measured by the standard deviation s. Here nominal =49.2, USL =62, LSL =38, m =50.2, s =2. Mean vs. Nominal

  19. A run chart is a plot of a quality characteristic as a function of time. It provides some idea of general trends and degree of variability. Run chart is very important at startup to identify the basic nature of a process. Without this information , one may use an inappropriate tool in analyzing the data. For example, a histogram might hide tool wear if frequent tool change and adjustment are made between groups and observations. 36.2 Run Chart or Diagram

  20. FIGURE 36-8 An example of a run chart or graph, which can reveal trends in the process behavior not shown by the histogram. Example of a Run Chart

  21. The most popular PC index indicates if the process has the ability to meet specifications. The process capacity index, Cp, is computed as follows: Cp = (tolerance spread) / (6s) = (USL – LSL) / (6s) A value of Cp >= 1.33 is considered good. The example in Fig 36-7: Cp = (USL – LSL)/(6s) = (62 – 38)/(6 x 2) =2 36.2 Process Capability Indexes

  22. The process capability ratio, Cp, only looks at variability or spread of process (compared to specifications) in term of sigmas. It doesn’t take into account the location of the process mean, m. Another process capability ratio Cpk for off-center processes: Cpk = min (Cpu, Cpl) = min[Cpu= (USL – m)/(3s), Cpl= (m – LSL)/(3s)] 36.2 Process Capability Indexes

  23. FIGURE 36-9 The output from the process is shifting toward the USL, which changes the Cpk ratio but not the Cp ratio. Output Shift

  24. In Fig. 36 – 10, the following five cases are covered. • 6s < USL –LSL or Cp > 1 • 6s < USL –LSL, but process has shifted. • 6s = USL –LSL, or Cp = 1 • 6s > USL –LSL or Cp < 1 • The mean and variability of the process have both changed. If a process capability is on the order of 2/3 to 3/4 of the design tolerance, there is a high probability that the process will produce all good parts over a long time period. 36.2 Process Capability Indexes

  25. FIGURE 36-10 Five different scenarios for a process output versus the designer’s specifications for the minimal (50) and upper and lower specifications of 65 and 38 respectively. reduced

  26. In Fig 36 – 11, an automated station checks parts for the proper diameter with the aid of a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT). Embedded in the clamping device is an LVDT position sensor for measurement of the diameter of a part. Once the measurement is made, the computer releases the clamp and the part can move on. If the diameter is in tolerance, a solenoid-actuated gate operated by the computer lets the part pass, otherwise, the part is rejected into a bin. 36.2 Process Capability Indexes

  27. Check Sheet FIGURE 36-12 Example of a check sheet for gathering data on a process.

More Related